The use of local magnitude (ML) in seismic hazard analyses is a topic of recent debate. In regions of weak or moderate seismicity, small earthquakes (characterized by ML) are commonly used to determine frequency–magnitude distributions (FMDs) for probabilistic seismic hazard calculations. However, empirical and theoretical studies on the relation between moment magnitude (M) and ML for small earthquakes show a systematic difference between the two below a region‐dependent magnitude threshold. This difference may introduce bias in the estimation of the frequency of larger events with given M, and consequently seismic hazard. For induced seismicity related to the Groningen gas field, this magnitude threshold is determined to be M2, with equality between M and ML at higher magnitudes. A quadratic relation between M and ML is derived for 0.5<ML<2, in correspondence to recent theoretical studies. Although the seismic hazard analysis for Groningen is internally consistent when expressed in terms of ML (with the implicit assumption of equivalence between the two scales), a more physical interpretation of the seismicity model requires transformation of the earthquake catalog from local to moment magnitude, especially because the dataset currently used in estimating time‐dependent hazard consists mainly of ML<2.5 events. We show that measured station effects, derived from M calculations, correspond to predicted model calculations used to determine a ground‐motion model for the region.

You do not currently have access to this article.