We thank John Ebel for his interest and his comment (Ebel, 2016) on our paper that presented our statistical analysis of aftershock activities in the St. Lawrence Valley, including the sequence from the 1663 Charlevoix earthquake. The main disagreement he had with our paper is that he found it difficult to understand how the data points plotted on figure 5 of Fereidoni and Atkinson (2014; hereafter referred to as FA14) were calculated, and he surmised that they might be in error. We take this opportunity to more fully document the calculation of the data points in question...

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview
You do not currently have access to this article.