Stress drop is a fundamental parameter related to earthquake source physics, but is hard to measure accurately. To better understand how different factors influence stress‐drop measurements, we compare two different methods using the Ridgecrest stress‐drop validation data set: spectral decomposition (SD) and spectral ratio (SR), each with different processing options. We also examine the influence of spectral complexity on source parameter measurement. Applying the SD method, we find that frequency bandwidth and time‐window length could influence spectral magnitude calibration, while depth‐dependent attenuation is important to correctly map stress‐drop variations. For the SR method, we find that the selected source model has limited influence on the measurements; however, the Boatwright model tends to produce smaller standard deviation and larger magnitude dependence than the Brune model. Variance reduction threshold, frequency bandwidth, and time‐window length, if chosen within an appropriate parameter range, have limited influence on source parameter measurement. For both methods, wave type, attenuation correction, and spectral complexity strongly influence the result. The scale factor that quantifies the magnitude dependence of stress drop show large variations with different processing options, and earthquakes with complex source spectra deviating from the Brune‐type source models tend to have larger scale factor than earthquakes without complexity. Based on these detailed comparisons, we make a few specific suggestions for data processing workflows that could help future studies of source parameters and interpretations.

You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.