Relationships between relative plate velocity and seismicity differ by plate-boundary class. We test the null hypothesis of linearity of earthquake rates with velocity in each of seven classes. A linear relationship is expected if earthquake rate is proportional to seismic moment rate, which is proportional to relative plate velocity. To reduce bias by aftershocks and swarms, we estimate independence probabilities of earthquakes and use them as weights. We assign shallow earthquakes to boundary steps and classes, then sort boundary steps within each class by velocity and plot cumulative earthquakes against cumulative model moment rate. We use two measures of nonlinearity and 104 stochastic simulations to assess significance. In subduction zones the relationship between seismicity and velocity is nonlinear with 99.9% confidence. Slower subduction at <66 mm/a (producing 35% of tectonic moment under the null hypothesis) produces only 20% of subduction earthquakes. Continental convergent boundaries display similar nonlinearity (P<0.001 for the null hypothesis). Ocean spreading ridges show seismicity decreasing with velocity. Oceanic transform faults and oceanic convergent boundaries show marginal nonlinearity (P<0.01; P<0.05). Continental rifts and continental transform faults follow the null hypothesis. Three effects may contribute to velocity dependence in subduction: (1) the brittle/ductile transition at a critical temperature is advected deeper by faster underthrusting; (2) subducted sediment is viscous, so lower stresses in slower boundaries discourage earthquakes; (3) pore pressures increase with velocity, encouraging frictional failure. Mechanism (1) has only minor effects on earthquake productivity, but mechanisms (2) and (3) could be important.

You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.