Abstract

On average, soil sites behaved nonlinearly during the M 6.7 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. This conclusion follows from an analysis that combines elements of two independent lines of investigation. First, we apply the stochastic finite-fault simulation method, calibrated with 28 rock-site recordings of the Northridge mainshock, to the simulation of the input motions to the soil sites that recorded this event. The calibrated model has a near-zero average bias in reproducing ground motions at rock sites in the frequency range from 0.1 to 12.5 Hz.

The soil sites selected are those where there is colocation of strong-motion accelerographs and temporary instruments from the Northridge aftershock observation network. At these sites, weak-motion amplification functions based on numerous aftershock records have been empirically determined, in three separate investigations reported in the literature. These empirical weak-motion amplification factors can be applied to the simulated input rock motions, at each soil site, to determine the expected motions during the mainshock (i.e., neglecting nonlinearity). These expected motions can then be compared to the actual recordings during the mainshock.

This analysis shows that the recorded strong-motion spectra are significantly over-estimated if weak-motion amplifications are used. The null hypothesis, stating that the inferred differences between weak- and strong-motion amplifications are statistically insignificant, is rejected with 95% confidence in the frequency range from approximately 2.2 to 10 Hz. On average, the difference between weak- and strong-motion amplifications is a factor of 2. Nonlinear response at those soil stations for which the input peak acceleration exceeded 150 to 200 cm/sec2 contributes most to this observed average difference. These findings suggest a significant nonlinear response at soil stations in the Los Angeles urban area during the Northridge mainshock. The effect is consistent with the increase in damping of shear waves at high levels of strain, which is well known from geotechnical studies of soil properties.

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview
You do not currently have access to this article.