We thank Guidotti et al. (2019) for their comment on our work, and apologize for the incorrect statement, as written, that their paper did not contain quantitative analysis. The cited phrase on page 2131 in Razafindrakoto et al. (2018) was intended to more specifically note that Guidotti et al. (2011) did not quantitatively compare their simulation‐observation misfit with alternative predictions using conventional empirical ground‐motion models. The Anderson (2004) criteria provide a quantitative measure of misfit in an absolute sense, but are not able to provide a relative comparison with widely adopted empirical models used in ground‐motion prediction and seismic hazard...

You do not currently have access to this article.