We would like to thank Patton and Pabian (2014; hereafter referred to as PP14) for their comments and for calling our attention to some of the unresolved issues and uncertainties associated with characterizing the sources of underground nuclear tests in remote and limited access areas based on available seismic and other data resources. Although they raise a number of issues regarding event locations, surface‐wave excitation, and explosion yields, we believe that the results presented in our original paper (Murphy et al., 2013; hereafter referred to as M13) for the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) 2006...

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview
You do not currently have access to this article.