Issues

OPINION
An Editor’s Farewell: Achievements, Challenges, and Thanks
Hello from the New Editor‐in‐Chief
A Critical Data Gap in Earthquake Physics
FOCUS SECTION
Preface to the Focus Section on Subduction Zone Processes in the Americas
Isolated Triggered Tremor Spots in South America and Implications for Global Tremor Activity
Shallow Nonvolcanic Tremor Activity and Potential Repeating Earthquakes in the Chile Triple Junction: Seismic Evidence of the Subduction of the Active Nazca–Antarctic Spreading Center
Tectonic Analysis of the Southern of María Cleofas Island from Bathymetric and Seismic Data
Seismic Structure of the Southern Rivera Plate and Jalisco Block Subduction Zone
Analysis of the Seismicity in the Jalisco Block from June to December 2015
Kinematics of Subduction Processes during the Earthquake Cycle in Central Chile
Slip Distribution of the 1985 Valparaíso Earthquake Constrained with Seismic and Deformation Data
Analysis of the 2014 7.3 Papanoa (Mexico) Earthquake: Implications for Seismic Hazard Assessment
Tsunami Hazard Evaluation in the Coquimbo Region Using Nonuniform Slip Distribution Sources
Localized Anisotropic Subduction‐Zone Structure in Southern Peru: Constraints from Teleseismic Receiver Functions and Forward Modeling
ARTICLES
The January 2019 ( 6.7) Coquimbo Earthquake: Insights from a Seismic Sequence within the Nazca Plate
Triggering of the Pohang, Korea, Earthquake ( 5.5) by Enhanced Geothermal System Stimulation
Sensitivities of Geodetic Source Analyses to Elastic Crust Heterogeneity Constrained by Seismic Tomography for the 2017 6.5 Jiuzhaigou, China, Earthquake
Ground Motion from 1.5 to 3.9 Aftershocks of the 2014 6.2 Jinggu Earthquake at Hypocentral Distances < 45 km in Yunnan, China
Seismic Activity in the Central Adriatic Offshore of Italy: A Review of the 1987 5 Porto San Giorgio Earthquake
Real‐Time Imaging, Forecasting, and Management of Human‐Induced Seismicity at Preston New Road, Lancashire, England
Rapid Estimation of the Epicentral Distance in the Earthquake Early Warning System around the Tehran Region, Iran
Minimum 1D Velocity Model and Local Magnitude Scale for Myanmar
Assessing the Sensitivity and Accuracy of the MyShake Smartphone Seismic Network to Detect and Characterize Earthquakes
Bear Encounters with Seismic Stations in Alaska and Northwestern Canada
Near‐Real‐Time Finite‐Fault Inversions for Large Earthquakes in Chile Using Strong‐Motion Data
Global‐ and Local‐Scale High‐Resolution Event Catalogs for Algorithm Testing
New Earthquake Data in the Calabrian Subduction Zone, Italy, Suggest Revision of the Presumed Dynamics in the Upper Part of the Subducting Slab
Waveform Cross‐Correlation for Differential Time Measurement: Bias and Limitations
EASTERN SECTION
Site Response in the Oklahoma Region from Seismic Recordings of the 2011 5.7 Prague Earthquake
ELECTRONIC SEISMOLOGIST
Stream2segment: An Open‐Source Tool for Downloading, Processing, and Visualizing Massive Event‐Based Seismic Waveform Datasets
3DMRT: A Computer Package for 3D Model‐Based Seismic Wave Propagation
EDUQUAKES
Creating an Online Video Course for Computational Wave Propagation
DATA MINE
The LArge‐ Seismic Survey in Oklahoma (LASSO) Experiment
SSA ANNUAL MEETING REPORT
2019 SSA Annual Meeting Report
MEETING CALENDAR
Meeting Calendar
ERRATA
The December 2018 5.7 and January 2019 5.3 Earthquakes in South Sichuan Basin Induced by Shale Gas Hydraulic Fracturing
Tsunami Hazard Evaluation in the Coquimbo Region Using Nonuniform Slip Distribution Sources
-
Cover Image
Cover Image
Front: In remote regions of Alaska and northwestern Canada, bears are regular visitors to seismic stations, and Tape et al. (this issue) document their visits at three recent projects. Evidence gathered suggests that remote stations are visited by bears more regularly than non-remote stations, and that data losses because of bears are minor (<5%) and occur exclusively at remote stations. The authors propose that the threat of damage from bears to a station increases with the remoteness of the site and the density of bears, and it decreases with the strength and security of materials used to protect the station. They suggest that the installation of low-power electric fences be considered for seismic stations, especially for temporary experiments, to protect the equipment and to protect the bears.
Back: The American subduction zones, stretching more than 8000 km from Mexico to southern Chile and covering ∼5000 km in the eastern Caribbean, lead to earthquakes, tsunamis, and volcanic eruptions that threaten the region’s large and growing population. An unprecedented amount of data from recent seismic events and deployments has given rise to new ideas about seismic rupture, subduction geometry, triggered events, nonvolcanic tremors, and the earthquake cycle. In this issue of SRL, the Focus Section on Subduction Zone Processes in the Americas presents 10 original articles that address these new developments as part of an international effort to connect researchers and ideas along the Latin America subduction zone. The illustration, from Chao et al. (this issue), shows some of the subduction features in this expansive region.
- PDF Icon PDF LinkFront Matter
- PDF Icon PDF LinkTable of Contents
- PDF Icon PDF LinkBack Matter
- PDF Icon PDF LinkEditorial Board