Skip Nav Destination
Issues
Volume 89, Number 4
1 July 2018
ISSN 0895-0695
EISSN 1938-2057
SSA NEWS AND NOTES
SSA News and Notes
Seismological Research Letters June 13, 2018, Vol.89, 1225. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180154
FOCUS SECTION
Preface to the Focus Section on the Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP): New Results and Future Directions
Seismological Research Letters June 13, 2018, Vol.89, 1226-1228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180161
Highlights from the First Ten Years of the New Zealand Earthquake Forecast Testing Center
David A. Rhoades; Annemarie Christophersen; Matthew C. Gerstenberger; Maria Liukis; Fabio Silva; Warner Marzocchi; Maximilian J. Werner; Thomas H. Jordan
Seismological Research Letters June 13, 2018, Vol.89, 1229-1237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180032
The Forecasting Skill of Physics‐Based Seismicity Models during the 2010–2012 Canterbury, New Zealand, Earthquake Sequence
Camilla Cattania; Maximilian J. Werner; Warner Marzocchi; Sebastian Hainzl; David Rhoades; Matthew Gerstenberger; Maria Liukis; William Savran; Annemarie Christophersen; Agnès Helmstetter; Abigail Jimenez; Sandy Steacy; Thomas H. Jordan
Seismological Research Letters June 13, 2018, Vol.89, 1238-1250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180033
Prospective CSEP Evaluation of 1‐Day, 3‐Month, and 5‐Yr Earthquake Forecasts for Italy
M. Taroni; W. Marzocchi; D. Schorlemmer; M. J. Werner; S. Wiemer; J. D. Zechar; L. Heiniger; F. Euchner
Seismological Research Letters June 13, 2018, Vol.89, 1251-1261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180031
Prospective Evaluation of Global Earthquake Forecast Models: 2 Yrs of Observations Provide Preliminary Support for Merging Smoothed Seismicity with Geodetic Strain Rates
Anne Strader; Maximilian Werner; José Bayona; Philip Maechling; Fabio Silva; Maria Liukis; Danijel Schorlemmer
Seismological Research Letters June 13, 2018, Vol.89, 1262-1271. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180051
Ranking Some Global Forecasts with the Kagan Information Score
Seismological Research Letters June 13, 2018, Vol.89, 1272-1276. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180029
Ensemble Smoothed Seismicity Models for the New Italian Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Map
Seismological Research Letters June 13, 2018, Vol.89, 1277-1287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180040
Testing the Classic 1988 Forecast
Seismological Research Letters June 13, 2018, Vol.89, 1288-1297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180039
Exploring Magnitude Forecasting of the Next Earthquake
Seismological Research Letters June 13, 2018, Vol.89, 1298-1304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180034
The Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability: Achievements and Priorities
Danijel Schorlemmer; Maximilian J. Werner; Warner Marzocchi; Thomas H. Jordan; Yosihiko Ogata; David D. Jackson; Sum Mak; David A. Rhoades; Matthew C. Gerstenberger; Naoshi Hirata; Maria Liukis; Philip J. Maechling; Anne Strader; Matteo Taroni; Stefan Wiemer; Jeremy D. Zechar; Jiancang Zhuang
Seismological Research Letters June 13, 2018, Vol.89, 1305-1313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180053
ARTICLES
2017 8.1 Tehuantepec Earthquake: Deep Slip and Rupture Directivity Enhance Ground Shaking but Weaken the Tsunami
Seismological Research Letters May 30, 2018, Vol.89, 1314-1322. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170277
The 21 August 2017 4.0 Casamicciola Earthquake: First Evidence of Coseismic Normal Surface Faulting at the Ischia Volcanic Island
Rosa Nappi; Giuliana Alessio; Germana Gaudiosi; Rosella Nave; Enrica Marotta; Valeria Siniscalchi; Riccardo Civico; Luca Pizzimenti; Rosario Peluso; Pasquale Belviso; Sabina Porfido
Seismological Research Letters June 13, 2018, Vol.89, 1323-1334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180063
The Large Greenland Landslide of 2017: Was a Tsunami Warning Possible?
Wei‐An Chao; Tso‐Ren Wu; Kuo‐Fong Ma; Yu‐Ting Kuo; Yih‐Min Wu; Li Zhao; Meng‐Ju Chung; Han Wu; Yu‐Lin Tsai
Seismological Research Letters April 25, 2018, Vol.89, 1335-1344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170160
Source Fault and Slip Distribution of the 2017 6.5 Jiuzhaigou, China, Earthquake and Its Tectonic Implications
Yingfeng Zhang; Guohong Zhang; Eric A. Hetland; Xinjian Shan; Huiping Zhang; Dezheng Zhao; Wenyu Gong; Chunyan Qu
Seismological Research Letters May 16, 2018, Vol.89, 1345-1353. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170255
Strong‐Motion Observations of the 2017 7.0 Jiuzhaigou Earthquake: Comparison with the 2013 7.0 Lushan Earthquake
Seismological Research Letters May 30, 2018, Vol.89, 1354-1365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170238
Seismicity in the Challis, Idaho, Region, January 2014–May 2017: Late Aftershocks of the 1983 7.3 Borah Peak Earthquake
Guanning Pang; Keith D. Koper; Michael C. Stickney; James C. Pechmann; Relu Burlacu; Kristine L. Pankow; Suzette Payne; Harley M. Benz
Seismological Research Letters May 09, 2018, Vol.89, 1366-1378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180058
Deep Crustal Earthquakes in the Beaufort Sea, Western Canadian Arctic, from Teleseismic Depth Phase Analysis
Seismological Research Letters May 09, 2018, Vol.89, 1379-1384. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180047
Resolving the 1906 7.1 Meishan, Taiwan, Earthquake from Historical Seismic Records
Seismological Research Letters May 02, 2018, Vol.89, 1385-1396. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170285
A Generic Velocity Profile for Basin Sediments in California Conditioned on
Seismological Research Letters May 23, 2018, Vol.89, 1397-1409. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170268
Analysis of Mean Seismic Ground Motion and Its Uncertainty Based on the UCERF3 Geologic Slip‐Rate Uncertainty for California
Seismological Research Letters April 25, 2018, Vol.89, 1410-1419. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170114
Candidate Products for Operational Earthquake Forecasting Illustrated Using the HayWired Planning Scenario, Including One Very Quick (and Not‐So‐Dirty) Hazard‐Map Option
Seismological Research Letters April 18, 2018, Vol.89, 1420-1434. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170241
A Seismogeodetic Amphibious Network in the Guerrero Seismic Gap, Mexico
Víctor M. Cruz‐Atienza; Yoshihiro Ito; Vladimir Kostoglodov; Vala Hjörleifsdóttir; Arturo Iglesias; Josué Tago; Marco Calò; Jorge Real; Allen Husker; Satoshi Ide; Takuya Nishimura; Masanao Shinohara; Carlos Mortera‐Gutierrez; Soliman García; Motoyuki Kido
Seismological Research Letters May 23, 2018, Vol.89, 1435-1449. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170173
The Ambient Seismic Field at Groningen Gas Field: An Overview from the Surface to Reservoir Depth
Seismological Research Letters May 30, 2018, Vol.89, 1450-1466. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170256
Crustal Deformation in the Hutubi Underground Gas Storage Site in China Observed by GPS and InSAR Measurements
Qiao Xuejun; Chen Wei; Wang Dijin; Nie Zhaosheng; Chen Zhengsong; Li Jie; Wang Xiaoqiang; Li Yu; Wang Tan; Feng Guangcai
Seismological Research Letters April 18, 2018, Vol.89, 1467-1477. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170221
Robust Picking and Accurate Location with RSNI‐Picker2: Real‐Time Automatic Monitoring of Earthquakes and Nontectonic Events
Seismological Research Letters May 16, 2018, Vol.89, 1478-1487. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170206
Low‐Frequency Ambient Noise Autocorrelations: Waveforms and Normal Modes
Seismological Research Letters May 30, 2018, Vol.89, 1488-1496. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180027
Explosion‐Generated Infrasound Recorded on Ground and Airborne Microbarometers at Regional Distances
Seismological Research Letters May 23, 2018, Vol.89, 1497-1506. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180038
ELECTRONIC SEISMOLOGIST
MTfit: A Bayesian Approach to Seismic Moment Tensor Inversion
Seismological Research Letters May 16, 2018, Vol.89, 1507-1513. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170273
Contour‐Based Frequency‐Domain Event Detection for Seismic Arrays
Seismological Research Letters May 23, 2018, Vol.89, 1514-1523. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170242
HISTORICAL SEISMOLOGIST
Historical Seismicity of the Rijeka Region (Northwest External Dinarides, Croatia)—Part II: The Klana Earthquakes of 1870
Seismological Research Letters May 30, 2018, Vol.89, 1524-1536. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180064
COMMUNICATING SCIENCE
Not Everyone Likes to Hear You Say, “Earthquakes Are Fun”
Seismological Research Letters June 13, 2018, Vol.89, 1537-1538. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180152
EDUQUAKES
A High School Students’ Geophysical Survey in a Seismically Active Area: The PRESS40 Project
Seismological Research Letters April 25, 2018, Vol.89, 1539-1545. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170219
DATA MINE
The Chilean GNSS Network: Current Status and Progress toward Early Warning Applications
J. C. Báez; F. Leyton; C. Troncoso; F. del Campo; M. Bevis; C. Vigny; M. Moreno; M. Simons; E. Kendrick; H. Parra; F. Blume
Seismological Research Letters April 18, 2018, Vol.89, 1546-1554. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180011
The ARGONET (Greece) Seismic Observatory: An Accelerometric Vertical Array and Its Data
N. Theodoulidis; F. Hollender; A. Mariscal; D. Moiriat; P.‐Y. Bard; A. Konidaris; M. Cushing; K. Konstantinidou; Z. Roumelioti
Seismological Research Letters June 06, 2018, Vol.89, 1555-1565. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180042
Development of a Slow Earthquake Database
Masayuki Kano; Naofumi Aso; Takanori Matsuzawa; Satoshi Ide; Satoshi Annoura; Ryuta Arai; Satoru Baba; Michael Bostock; Kevin Chao; Kosuke Heki; Satoshi Itaba; Yoshihiro Ito; Noriko Kamaya; Takuto Maeda; Julie Maury; Mamoru Nakamura; Takuya Nishimura; Koichiro Obana; Kazuaki Ohta; Natalia Poiata; Baptiste Rousset; Hiroko Sugioka; Ryota Takagi; Tsutomu Takahashi; Akiko Takeo; Yoko Tu; Naoki Uchida; Yusuke Yamashita; Kazushige Obara
Seismological Research Letters June 13, 2018, Vol.89, 1566-1575. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180021
A High‐Resolution Seismological Experiment to Evaluate and Monitor the Seismic Response of the Saint‐Guérin Arch Dam, French Alps
Eleni Koufoudi; Emmanuel Chaljub; Isabelle Douste‐Bacqué; Sandrine Roussel; Pierre‐Yves Bard; Eric Larose; Frédéric Dufour; Nicolas Humbert; Laurent Baillet
Seismological Research Letters June 13, 2018, Vol.89, 1576-1582. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180067
EASTERN SECTION
A Notable Earthquake Swarm in Alabama: Natural or Anthropogenic?
Seismological Research Letters April 25, 2018, Vol.89, 1583-1594. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170284
MEETING CALENDAR
Meeting Calendar
Seismological Research Letters June 13, 2018, Vol.89, 1595. doi:https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180160
-
Cover Image
Cover Image
![issue cover]()
Front: Since 1 October 2015, the global earthquake activity rate (GEAR1) seismicity model has undergone prospective evaluation within the Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP) testing center, forecasting Mw ≥ 5.95 seismicity. As part of this issue’s Focus Section on the Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP): New Results and Future Directions, Strader et al. present initial prospective forecast test results for the GEAR1 model, its tectonic and seismicity components, and the first iteration of the strain-rate-based model, during the 1 October 2015–7 September 2017 period. Forecast maps showing Mw ≥ 5.95 earthquake epicentroid rates for GEAR1 and other models are illustrated here.
Back: Linville et al. (Electronic Seismologist, this issue) present a frequency domain array-based detection algorithm that exploits the gridded station configuration of the EarthScope Transportable Array to detect and locate small magnitude (M < 2.5) earthquakes. The authors apply the method to three sedimentary basins in the central United States as well as a dataset from Yellowstone National Park. Results from the Yellowstone data demonstrate that when array station spacing remains regular, events from nonearthquake sources such as hydrothermal features can be successfully detected and located without the necessity to tune parameters for specific sources. Daytime (red, assumed anthropogenic) and nighttime (yellow) detections from one day of data from the Doublet Pool and Old Faithful are shown.
- PDF Icon PDF LinkFront Matter
- PDF Icon PDF LinkTable of Contents
- PDF Icon PDF LinkBack Matter
- PDF Icon PDF LinkEditorial Board
