Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination

Preface to the Focus Section on the Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP): New Results and Future Directions

Seismological Research Letters (2018) 89 (4): 1226–1228.
This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.
Evaluation of a Decade-Long Prospective Earthquake Forecasting Experiment in Italy
Seismological Research Letters (2024)
SimplETAS: A Benchmark Earthquake Forecasting Model Suitable for Operational Purposes and Seismic Hazard Analysis
Seismological Research Letters (2024) 95 (1): 38.
Applying the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) in earthquake spatial forecasting: a case study on probabilistic seismic hazard function (PSHF) estimation in the Sumatra subduction zone
Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk (2024) 15 (1)
A Test of the Earthquake Gap Hypothesis in Mexico: The Case of the Guerrero Gap
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2023) 113 (1): 468.
Comparison between alarm-based and probability-based earthquake forecasting methods
Geophysical Journal International (2023) 235 (2): 1541.
Earthquake alerting based on spatial geodetic data by spatiotemporal information transformation learning
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) 120 (37)
pyCSEP: A Python Toolkit For Earthquake Forecast Developers
Journal of Open Source Software (2022) 7 (69): 3658.
Long-Term Forecasting of Strong Earthquakes in North America, South America, Japan, Southern China and Northern India With Machine Learning
Frontiers in Earth Science (2022) 10
Ranking earthquake forecasts using proper scoring rules: binary events in a low probability environment
Geophysical Journal International (2022) 230 (2): 1419.
A review of source models to further the understanding of the seismicity of the Groningen field
Netherlands Journal of Geosciences (2022) 101
Prospective evaluation of multiplicative hybrid earthquake forecasting models in California
Geophysical Journal International (2022) 229 (3): 1736.
Some Systemic Risks to Progress on Seismic Hazard Assessment
Seismological Research Letters (2022) 93 (2A): 513.
On the Use of High‐Resolution and Deep‐Learning Seismic Catalogs for Short‐Term Earthquake Forecasts: Potential Benefits and Current Limitations
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (2022) 127 (11)
Generalizing the Inversion-Based PSHA Source Model for an Interconnected Fault System
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2021) 111 (1): 371.
A Critical Review of Ground Based Observations of Earthquake Precursors
Frontiers in Earth Science (2021) 9
An improved K-means clustering algorithm for global earthquake catalogs and earthquake magnitude prediction
Journal of Seismology (2021) 25 (3): 1005.
Global Earthquake Forecasting System (GEFS): The challenges ahead
The European Physical Journal Special Topics (2021) 230 (1): 473.
Improvements to the Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast ETAS Model (UCERF3-ETAS)
The Seismic Record (2021) 1 (2): 117.
Probabilistic Forecasting of Hydraulic Fracturing-Induced Seismicity Using an Injection-Rate Driven ETAS Model
Seismological Research Letters (2021) 92 (6): 3471.
No Significant Effect of Coulomb Stress on the Gutenberg-Richter Law after the Landers Earthquake
Scientific Reports (2020) 10 (1)
Two global ensemble seismicity models obtained from the combination of interseismic strain measurements and earthquake-catalogue information
Geophysical Journal International (2020) 224 (3): 1945.
Magnitude correlations in a self-similar aftershock rates model of seismicity
Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics (2020) 27 (1): 1.
The Predictive Skills of Elastic Coulomb Rate-and-State Aftershock Forecasts during the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, Earthquake Sequence
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (4): 1736.
Pseudoprospective Evaluation of UCERF3-ETAS Forecasts during the 2019 Ridgecrest Sequence
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (4): 1799.
The Physics of Earthquake Forecasting
Seismological Research Letters (2020) 91 (4): 1936.
Data‐Driven Optimization of Seismicity Models Using Diverse Data Sets: Generation, Evaluation, and Ranking Using Inlabru
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (2020) 125 (11)
Improving Physics‐Based Aftershock Forecasts During the 2016–2017 Central Italy Earthquake Cascade
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (2019) 124 (8): 8626.
On the Apparently Inappropriate Use of Multiple Hypothesis Testing in Earthquake Prediction Studies
Seismological Research Letters (2019) 90 (3): 1330.
Features of Seismic Sequences Are Similar in Different Crustal Tectonic Regions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2019) 109 (5): 1594.
Modeling the earthquake occurrence with time-dependent processes: a brief review
Acta Geophysica (2019) 67 (3): 739.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal