Skip to Main Content
GeoScienceWorld
Skip Nav Destination

Assessing Ground‐Motion Amplitudes and Attenuation for Small‐to‐Moderate Induced and Tectonic Earthquakes in the Central and Eastern United States

Seismological Research Letters (2017) 88 (5): 1379–1389.
This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.
Ground-Motion Model for Small-to-Moderate Potentially Induced Earthquakes Using an Ensemble Machine Learning Approach for CENA
  • Najme Alidadi
  • Shahram Pezeshk
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2024) 114 (4): 2202.
Ground motion model for Peninsular India using an artificial neural network
  • Yellapragada Meenakshi
  • Sreenath Vemula
  • Akshay Alne
  • STG Raghukanth
Earthquake Spectra (2023) 39 (1): 596.
Ground Motion Models for the Induced Earthquakes by the Geothermal Power Plants Activity
  • Ali Khansefid
  • Seyed Mahmoudreza Yadollahi
  • Gerhard Müller
  • Francesca Taddei
Journal of Earthquake Engineering (2023) 27 (5): 1324.
Spatial correlation in ground motion prediction errors in Central and Eastern North America
  • Emily M Gibson
  • Michelle T Bensi
Earthquake Spectra (2022) 38 (1): 543.
Probabilistic residual capacity assessment of mainshock-damaged multi-span simply supported concrete girder bridges subjected to aftershocks
  • Parshan Sedaghati
  • Mohsen Gerami
  • Hosein Naderpour
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering (2022) 20 (11): 6267.
Attenuation relationships of peak ground motions in the Jazan Region
  • Ali K. Abdelfattah
  • Abdullah Al-amri
  • Kamal Abdelrahman
  • Muhamed Fnais
  • Saleh Qaysi
Arabian Journal of Geosciences (2021) 14 (3)
A ground-motion prediction model for small-to-moderate induced earthquakes for Central and Eastern United States
  • Zoya Farajpour
  • Shahram Pezeshk
Earthquake Spectra (2021) 37 (1_suppl): 1440.
What the Frack? The Impact of Seismic Activity on Residential Property Values
  • Chris Mothorpe
  • David Wyman
Journal of Housing Research (2021) 30 (1): 34.
Ground Motions from Induced Earthquakes in Oklahoma and Kansas
  • Morgan P. Moschetti
  • Eric M. Thompson
  • Peter M. Powers
  • Susan M. Hoover
  • Daniel E. McNamara
Seismological Research Letters (2019) 90 (1): 160.
Ground‐Motion Prediction Equations for Western Saudi Arabia
  • Ryota Kiuchi
  • Walter D. Mooney
  • Hani M. Zahran
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2019) 109 (6): 2722.
Regional Ground Motion Prediction Equation for Sakhalin Island
  • A. V. Konovalov
  • K. A. Manaychev
  • A. A. Stepnov
  • A. V. Gavrilov
Seismic Instruments (2019) 55 (1): 70.
Comparison of polarity in Groningen data with that of other natural and induced seismicity records, and implications in hazard and risk models
  • İhsan Engin Bal
  • Eleni Smyrou
  • Dimitris Dais
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering (2019) 17 (8): 4457.
Artificial Neural Network‐Based Framework for Developing Ground‐Motion Models for Natural and Induced Earthquakes in Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas
  • Farid Khosravikia
  • Patricia Clayton
  • Zoltan Nagy
Seismological Research Letters (2019) 90 (2A): 604.
A framework for time-varying induced seismicity risk assessment, with application in Oklahoma
  • Abhineet Gupta
  • Jack W. Baker
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering (2019) 17 (8): 4475.
Combining Dynamic Rupture Simulations with Ground‐Motion Data to Characterize Seismic Hazard from Mw 3 to 5.8 Earthquakes in Oklahoma and Kansas
  • Samuel A. Bydlon
  • Kyle B. Withers
  • Eric M. Dunham
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2019) 109 (2): 652.
Tectonic interpretation of the Raniya earthquake, Kurdistan, northern Iraq
  • Jamal A. H. Doski
Journal of Seismology (2019) 23 (2): 303.
Effect of Uncertainty in Source Parameters on Ground‐Motion Variability for Potentially Induced Earthquakes in the Central United States
  • Joanna M. Holmgren
  • Gail M. Atkinson
Seismological Research Letters (2018) 89 (2A): 702.
Assessing the Applicability of Ground‐Motion Models for Induced Seismicity Application in Central and Eastern North America
  • Ali Farhadi
  • Shahram Pezeshk
  • Naeem Khoshnevis
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2018) 108 (4): 2265.
A Framework for Post-Earthquake Response Planning in Emerging Seismic Regions: An Oklahoma Case Study
  • P. S. Harvey
  • S. K. Heinrich
  • K. K. Muraleetharan
Earthquake Spectra (2018) 34 (2): 503.
Ground‐Motion Models for Very‐Hard‐Rock Sites in Eastern North America: An Update
  • David M. Boore
Seismological Research Letters (2018) 89 (3): 1172.
Evaluating the 2016 One‐Year Seismic Hazard Model for the Central and Eastern United States Using Instrumental Ground‐Motion Data
  • S. Mostafa Mousavi
  • Gregory C. Beroza
Seismological Research Letters (2018) 89 (3): 1185.
Stress drops of induced and tectonic earthquakes in the central United States are indistinguishable
  • Yihe Huang
  • William L. Ellsworth
  • Gregory C. Beroza
Science Advances (2017) 3 (8)
Using Simulated Ground Motions to Constrain Near‐Source Ground‐Motion Prediction Equations in Areas Experiencing Induced Seismicity
  • Samuel A. Bydlon
  • Abhineet Gupta
  • Eric M. Dunham
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2017) 107 (5): 2078.
  • Online ISSN 1938-2057
  • ISSN 0895-0695
  • Copyright © 2024 Seismological Society of America
GeoScienceWorld
  • 1750 Tysons Boulevard, Suite 1500
  • McLean, VA 22102
  • Telephone: 1-800-341-1851
  • Copyright © 2024 GeoScienceWorld
Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal