Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination

Macroseismic Intensity Assessment Method for Web Questionnaires

Seismological Research Letters (2015) 86 (3): 985–990.
This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.
Seismic T Phases in the Western-Central Mediterranean: Source of Seismic Hazard?
Seismological Research Letters (2024) 95 (2A): 859.
Spatial variation of seismicity parameters in Meghalaya, North-East India
Acta Geophysica (2024)
On the crowdsourcing of macroseismic data to characterize geological settings
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (2023) 96: 103934.
How Expert Is the Crowd? Insights into Crowd Opinions on the Severity of Earthquake Damage
Data (2023) 8 (6): 108.
Inferring the depth and magnitude of pre-instrumental earthquakes from intensity attenuation curves
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (2023) 23 (3): 1007.
Earthquake perception data highlight natural frequency details of Italian buildings
Earthquake Spectra (2023) 39 (2): 1240.
“Shaking in 5 Seconds!”—Performance and User Appreciation Assessment of the Earthquake Network Smartphone-Based Public Earthquake Early Warning System
Seismological Research Letters (2022) 93 (1): 137.
Resilience of aging structures and infrastructure systems with emphasis on seismic resilience of bridges and road networks: Review
Resilient Cities and Structures (2022) 1 (2): 23.
A Probabilistic Framework for Modeling the Detection Capability of Smartphone Networks in Earthquake Early Warning
Seismological Research Letters (2022) 93 (6): 3291.
New Tools for Rapid Assessment of Felt Reports and a Case Study on Sakhalin Island
Seismic Instruments (2022) 58 (6): 676.
New Ground Motion to Intensity Conversion Equations (GMICEs) for New Zealand
Seismological Research Letters (2021) 92 (1): 448.
Collection of microseismic intensity data: a model for Turkey
Arabian Journal of Geosciences (2021) 14 (5)
Rapid assessment of seismic intensity based on Sina Weibo — A case study of the changning earthquake in Sichuan Province, China
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (2021) 58: 102217.
A citizen science approach for supporting rapid earthquake impact assessments
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (2021) 52: 101969.
A database of damaging small-to-medium magnitude earthquakes
Journal of Seismology (2020) 24 (2): 263.
Quantification of earthquake diagnostic effects to assess low macroseismic intensities
Natural Hazards (2020) 104 (3): 1957.
High-Intensity Assignments for the 22 February 2011 Mw 6.2 Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand, Earthquake: A Contribution toward Understanding the Severe Damage Caused by This Event
Seismological Research Letters (2019) 90 (4): 1468.
Inferring the depth of pre-instrumental earthquakes from macroseismic intensity data: a case-history from Northern Italy
Scientific Reports (2019) 9 (1)
Fast characterization of sources of recent Italian earthquakes from macroseismic intensities
Tectonophysics (2019) 750: 70.
New Macroseismic Intensity Assessment Method for New Zealand Web Questionnaires
Seismological Research Letters (2018) 89 (2A): 640.
Discriminating between natural and anthropogenic earthquakes: insights from the Emilia Romagna (Italy) 2012 seismic sequence
Scientific Reports (2017) 7 (1)
Role of African–Eurasian plate setting in the felt areas of intermediate‐depth earthquakes: an investigation using crowdsourced data
Terra Nova (2017) 29 (1): 36.
Frequency ranges and attenuation of macroseismic effects
Geophysical Journal International (2017) 210 (3): 1765.
An ordered probit model for seismic intensity data
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment (2017) 31 (7): 1593.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal