Abstract

The Exxon sequence models of Posamentier and coworkers incorporate two concepts which I question. They suggest that rivers grade to a "bayline", but evidence from modern major rivers indicates that they do not. They also proposed that fluvial sedimentary accomodation space is generated by the seaward shift in equilibrium profiles during sea-level fall, but this is too simplistic a model, based on the use of schematic continental margin configurations which do not incorporate real slope and relief data. In most cases, a fall in base level leads to deltaic progradation and upstream fluvial incision. Most coastal plain fluvial wedges result from two processes: sea-level rise, with the drowning and filling of estuaries, and active source-area tectonism. Major tectonic events adjacent to foreland basins, such as terrane collisions, lead to the development of sequences of third-order type (duration approximately 1-15 m.y.). Changes in intraplate stress regimes resulting from changes in regional plate kinematics have a similar episodicity and can be shown to be responsible for some third-order cycles on extensional continental margins. Examination of the chronostratigraphic basis of the Mesozoic-Cenozoic Cycle Chart of Haq and coworkers reveals internal inconsistencies and an unrealistic downplaying of the built-in potential for error. This chart is not an approved global standard, and it should be used with extreme caution.

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview
You do not currently have access to this article.