Exception is taken to statements (ibid., no. 1, p. 50-55) (1) that there is difficulty in recognizing apparent anomalies due to mass effect of uneven topography, (2) concerning usefulness of counting methods for laboratory determination of elemental uranium, and (3) that changes in water-flow rate impair reliability of hydrogeochemical prospecting.

This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.

First Page Preview

First page of A comparative evaluation of scintillometric, geochemical, and biogeochemical methods of prospecting for uranium; discussion
You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.