Giant Ore Deposits
The majority of world metal and fuel resources are contained in a very small proportion of the total number of world deposits that represent the upper end of the size spectrum of deposits. To survive in the increasingly competitive resource industry, mining companies must focus on finding or acquiring deposits of this type. The purpose of this workshop is to attempt to identify geological features that are characteristic or diagnostic of these very large deposits and their regional and local geological setting. One possibility is that very large deposits are just abnormally large “normal” deposits, being generated by essentially the same ore-forming process. Alternatively, the ore-forming process which generates very large deposits may be significantly different. The concern here is not with the well-known size differences between deposits of different geological type that contain the same metal (i.e., the difference between porphyry copper deposits and volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits as copper resources).
A number of different deposit types are being considered because there is very little useful quantitative data on the specific problem that we are addressing for any one deposit type. We hope that our lack of data on individual deposit types can be overcome by putting together parts of the puzzle from different deposit types. The paucity of data on the relationship between size and geological characteristics is unfortunate, but not surprising. Rarely is research concerned with widely accepted assumptions, no matter how important the implications of those assumptions. Few assumptions are more deeply ingrained in geology than the idea that ore-forming processes are independent of scale.
In this introduction, four general issues will be considered that are pertinent to the topic that is the focus of this volume: 1. ) what is a mineral deposit? 2.) how is size to be defmed so that it approximates as closely as possible a purely geological variable (as opposed to a mixed geologic-economic variable)? 3.) how are polymetallic deposits, and deposits of different geological type to be compared? 4.) what are the geological factors, and the nature of their interaction, that control the size of ore deposits?
A mineral deposit is defined as a single mineralized body, or a group of spatially associated mineralized bodies. In most cases, ore zones forming part of a mineral deposit are close enough to be developed and mined from one set of underground workings. In the case of deposits mined by open pit, however,
Giant and Bonanza Gold Deposits in the Epithermal Environment: Assessment of Potential Genetic Factors
-
Published:January 01, 1993
Abstract
Giant gold deposits are defined as those containing > 200 metric tons Au, and bonanza deposits as those containing > 30 metric tons Au averaging at least 30 g/t (1 oz/t). Sixteen giant and/or bonanza gold deposits around the Pacific rim are compared and contrasted in an attempt to determine the factor(s) controlling their development in the epithermal environment.
Metallogenic (regional) controlling factors seem to be excluded by the wide variety of tectonic, crustal, and petrochemical settings in which the deposits occur. The deposits are present in neutral, extensional, and, less commonly, compressive arcs. Extension may be concentrated within or behind principal arcs either during active subduction or immediately after cessation of subduction. Mineralized crust ranges from cratonic to primitive island arc. The petrochemisty of genetically related igneous rocks may be calc-alkaline or alkaline, with some extension-related suites being bimodal in character. Deposits are not confined to the proximity of major crustal faults or lineaments. The data base does suggest, however, that unusual arc settings characterized by tectonic complexity and relatively uncommon igneous rock compositions, especially the alkaline suite, are more prospective for giant and bonanza gold deposits than “normal”, andesite-dominated arcs.
Deposit- or district-scale factors also cannot be isolated as unique controls of giant or bonanza status. All epithermal deposit types, both high and low sulfidation, may develop exceptional tonnages and/or grades. No single mineralization style or local structural or lithologic setting acts as a universal control. Most deposits are parts of volcanic centers, but these may be dome complexes, maar-diatreme systems, calderas, or stratovolcanoes. Nor do the number or sequence of mineralizing events, the depth of gold deposition, or the inferred mechanism of gold precipitation influence profoundly the formation of all giant and bonanza gold deposits.
In the absence of any specific causative factor(s) of a regional or local character, it is difficult to avoid the empirical truism that supply of an unusually large amount of gold to the deposit site is the basic requirement. Large volumes of auriferous fluids may explain giant deposits, but exceptionally gold-rich fluids need to be invoked for generation of bonanzas. However, it is proposed that these fluid requirements must be combined with fortuitous geologic parameters or circumstances at the site of gold deposition if giant and/or bonanza rather than ordinary gold deposits are to develop in the epithermal environment.