Abstract
The purpose of this note is to compare an iterative algorithm to the Wiener technique for deconvolution of the sparker signature. The iterative algorithm, first proposed by Brigham et al. (1968), has been compared earlier to the Fourier method to obtain the inverse impulse response function of a long-period seismic monitoring station (Alessandrini and Perazzolo, 1987).
This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.
You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
