Abstract Mesozoic continental basins of northern China, including the Junggar Basin, provide some of the most spectacular and important fossil assemblages in the world, but their climatic and environmental contexts have been shrouded in uncertainty. Here we examine the main factors that determine those contexts: palaeolatitude; the effects of changing atmospheric gases on the radiative balance; and orbitally paced variations in insolation. Empirical evidence of these factors is accumulating rapidly and promises to upend many long-standing paradigms. We focus primarily on the Junggar Basin in Xinjiang, NW China, with the renowned Shishugou Biota, and the basins in Liaoning, Hebei and Inner Mongolia with their famous Jehol and Yanliao biotas. Accurate geochronology is necessary to disentangle these various factors, and we review the Late Triassic to Early Cretaceous U–Pb ages for these areas and supply a new laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry age for the otherwise un-dated Sangonghe Formation of Early Jurassic age. We review climate-sensitive facies patterns in North China and show that the climatic context changed synchronously in northwestern and northeastern China consistent with a previously proposed huge Late Jurassic–earliest Cretaceous true polar wander event, with all the major plates of East Asia docked with Siberia and moving together since at least the Triassic when the North China basins were at Arctic latitudes. We conclude that this true polar wander shift was responsible for the coal beds and ice-rafted debris being produced at high latitudes and the red beds and aeolian strata being deposited at low latitudes within the same basin. The climatic and taphonomic context in which the famous Shishugou, Yanliao and Jehol biotas were preserved was thus a function of true polar wander, as opposed to local tectonics or climate change.

We evaluated the age of two Upper Eocene impact ejecta layers (North American microtektites linked to the Chesapeake Bay impact structure and clinopyroxene [cpx] spherules from the Popigai crater) and the global effects of the associated impact events. The reported occurrence of cpx spherules from the Popigai impact structure at South Atlantic ODP Site 1090 within the middle of magnetochron C16n.1n yields a magnetochronologic age of 35.4 Ma. We generated high-resolution stable isotope records at Sites 1090, 612 (New Jersey slope), and Caribbean core RC9-58 that show: (1) a 0.5‰ δ 13 C decrease in bulk-carbonate at Site 1090 coincident with the Popigai cpx spherule layer, and (2) a 0.4‰–0.5‰ decrease in deep-water benthic foraminiferal δ 13 C values across the Popigai impact ejecta layer at Site 612 and core RC9-58. We conclude that the δ 13 C excursion associated with Popigai was a global event throughout the marine realm that can be correlated to magnetochron C16n.1n. The amplitude of this excursion (~0.5‰) is within the limits of natural variability, suggesting it was caused by a decrease in carbon export productivity, potentially triggered by the impact event(s). North American microtektites associated with the Chesapeake Bay impact occur stratigraphically above the Popigai cpx spherules at Site 612 and core RC9-58. We found no definite evidence of a δ 13 C anomaly associated with the North American microtektite layer, though further studies are warranted. High-resolution bulk-carbonate and benthic foraminiferal δ 18 O records show no global temperature change associated with the cpx spherule or North American microtektite layers.

Full article available in PDF version.

Abstract The last decade has witnessed significant advances in analytic techniques and methodologic approaches to understanding earth history. It was with this in mind that we convened a research symposium at the 67th annual meeting of SEPM in New Orleans (27 April 1993) entitled Geochronology, Time Scales and Stratigraphic Correlation: Framework for a Historical Geology. In a one day (27 April) symposium, 15 (of 18 scheduled) papers were presented on all aspects of the symposium topic. Oral presentations were complemented by a half day (28 April) poster session. The present volume represents a distillation of the symposium presentations with the inclusion of two of the three that were not presented owing to unavoidable circumstances, the addition of two new papers and the elimination of two of the papers presented at the symposium. The result is the 16 papers that constitute this volume and which represent a broad spectrum of approaches to understanding earth history and the passage of (geologic) time. But let’s back off a minute and ask what is time anyway? Time has been defined as a measured or measurable period, a continuum that lacks spatial dimensions. In the 5th century A.D., the Platonist St. Augustine wrestled with the inadequacy of words to define the concept. Time is of philosophical interest to us humans not the least because we regret the past and fear the (uncertainty and inevitability of) the future. Modern physics teaches us that time cannot, in fact, be treated in isolation from space. There is an interdependence