Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination

Solving unsolvable problems in stratigraphy (Comments to the paper “New data on the magnetostratigraphy of the Jurassic–Cretaceous boundary interval, Nordvik Peninsula (northern East Siberia)” by V.Yu. Bragin, O.S. Dzyuba, A.Yu. Kazansky, and B.N. Shurygin)

Russ. Geol. Geophys. (2013) 54 (3): 349–354.
This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.
Biostratigraphy and magnetostratigraphy of the upper Tithonian–Berriasian of the Crimean Mountains
Cretaceous Research (2018) 87: 5.
Palaeo- and rock-magnetic investigations across Jurassic-Cretaceous boundary at St Bertrand’s Spring, Drôme, France: applications to magnetostratigraphy
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica (2018) 62 (2): 323.
The Campanian–Maastrichtian magnetostratigraphy of the Volga region (vicinity of Volsk town)
Russian Geology and Geophysics (2018) 59 (3): 276.
Ammonites and magnetostratigraphy of the Berriasian–Valanginian boundary deposits from eastern Crimea
Geologica Carpathica (2017) 68 (6): 505.
New bio- and magnetostratigraphic data on Campanian‒Maastrichtian deposits of the classical Nizhnyaya Bannovka section (Volga river right bank, southern Saratov region)
Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation (2017) 25 (1): 39.
Magneto- and carbon-isotope stratigraphy of the Lower–Middle Bathonian in the Sokur section (Saratov, Central Russia): implications for global correlation
Russian Geology and Geophysics (2017) 58 (2): 206.
The Jurassic/Cretaceous boundary in northern Siberia and Boreal–Tethyan correlation of the boundary beds
Russian Geology and Geophysics (2015) 56 (4): 652.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal