Hydrogenation reactions are a major route of electron and proton flow on Earth. Interfacing geology and organic chemistry, hydrogenations occupy pivotal points in the Earth’s global geochemical cycles. Some examples of hydrogenation reactions on Earth today include the production and consumption of methane in both abiotic and biotic reactions, the reduction of protons in hydrothermal settings, and the biological synthesis and degradation of fatty acids. Hydrogenation reactions were likely important for prebiotic chemistry on the early Earth, and today serve as one of the fundamental reaction classes that enable cellular life to construct biomolecules. An understanding and awareness of hydrogenation reactions is helpful for comprehending the larger web of molecular and material inter-conversions on our planet. In this brief review we detail some important hydrogenation and dehydrogenation reactions as they relate to geology, biology, industry, and atmospheric chemistry. Such reactions have implications ranging from the suite of reactions on early Earth to industrial applications like the production of hydrocarbon fuel.


Hydrogenation is defined as reduction of a substrate (organic or mineral) by addition of hydrogen. This review surveys some of the key geochemical hydrogenation reactions of carbon on Earth where such reactions are widespread. Deep in the Earth’s interior, at high temperatures and pressures, these reactions play important roles in controlling the long-term redox state of the planet. Hydrogenation could have played a role in prebiotic chemistry on the ancient Earth through precursor reactions akin to the reactions enable cellular today. Hydrogenation reactions have been of industrial importance since their discovery, finding wide applications ranging from the production of margarine to the use of solar driven CO2 reduction to form petroleum and in liquid fuel technologies. Although the focus of this review will be carbon hydrogenations, we note that other substrates, such as oxygen, sulfate, and nitrogen gas, are also hydrogenated and dehydrogenated in nature. Table 1 shows a few examples. A more complete tabulation of hydrogenation reactions in biology is available in Tables 13 and 14 in Thauer et al. (1977), and a recent review on some topics discussed here has recently appeared (Preiner et al. 2018).

What is a hydrogenation reaction?

The hydrogen involved in a hydrogenation reaction can either come in the form of hydride (H), or the hydrogen atom (H), and is often accompanied by proton addition (H+). Hydrogenation reactions are categorized by the source of electrons and protons. When molecular hydrogen (H2) is the source of electrons and protons, as is often the case in both geology and industry, the reaction is simply known as “hydrogenation.” When another molecule is the source of electrons and protons, as is often the case in biology, the reaction is known as “transfer hydrogenation.” In the reverse direction, a hydrogenation reaction is referred to as a dehydrogenation.

Several relevant hydrogenation reactions are shown in Figure 1, which illustrates two pathways of CO2 reduction (C-1 reactions) as they exist in, and out of biology, as well as some hydrogenation reactions involving more than one carbon atom. Geologic hydrogenation reactions commonly involve simple inorganic oxidized carbon compounds, such as carbon mon-oxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO2), which react with H2 to form simple reduced carbon compounds, such as methane (CH4; “methanation”) or formate (HCO2). Biological enzymes enhance hydrogenation reaction rates by several orders of magnitude. Intriguingly, some of these enzymes use the same metals that facilitate catalysis of the abiotic reaction, such as nickel and iron. Biology also uses transfer hydrogenation reactions to synthesize substrates into sugars, fatty acids, and amino acids, using biological cofactors such as nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD), or the iron-sulfur protein ferredoxin as electron releasing reductants instead of H2.

Rather than only being hydrogenated themselves, carbon compounds can also act as hydrogen donors. For example, the common reductants formic acid and isopropanol can hydrogenate other molecules via transfer hydrogenation, resulting in the formation of CO2 and acetone, respectively. If the hydrogenation is written as the reduction of an alkene (R-CH=CH-R) to an alkane (R-CH2-CH2-R), then in general some species (DH2) will act as the hydrogen donor. In this formulation, R represents a carbon with unspecified bonding partners, and each line indicates a covalent bond. An example of a hydrogenation reaction is shown below where a carbon-carbon double bond is reduced.


The reduction of oxidized fatty acids to margarine is a well-known example of hydrogenation of alkenes to alkanes, where molecular hydrogen (H2) is used as the reductant, and the kinked double bonds in alkene fats are converted to more linear alkanes, the so-called saturated fats, which have a greater tendency to gel at room temperature.

Serpentinization: A geological facilitator of hydrogenation

Over the past two decades there has been a profound rise in appreciation of the importance of serpentinization in generating H2 in a wide range of environmental settings and conditions (see Box 1). The reducing conditions created by serpentinization can facilitate the hydrogenation of dissolved inorganic compounds, such as CO2, SO42, and NO3. Hydrogen production, here portrayed in a simplified and generalized reaction


Serpentinization 101

The alteration of magnesium- and iron-rich rocks by water is commonly referred to as “serpentinization.” This process turns a dry, dense, mechanically strong, and reduced rock into a hydrous, significantly less dense, mechanically weak, and strongly oxidized rock mainly composed of serpentine-group minerals. Serpentinization is widespread in marine environments and occurs at mid-ocean ridges, at ridge flanks and fracture zones, at magma-poor rifted plate margins, and in forearc settings of subduction zones. Serpentinization is evident in Archean rocks (komatiites), suggesting that it has been going on throughout most of Earth’s history. Notably, there is evidence from meteorites and remote sensing for serpentinization beyond Earth. The oxidation of iron by water generates molecular hydrogen, which, as a byproduct of serpentinization, is of central importance for hydrogenotrophic microorganisms and the abiotic hydrogenation of carbon compounds to form hydrocarbons.

Hydrogen produced during serpentinization can facilitate the abiotic formation of CH4 and other hydrocarbons via hydrogenation of CO2. Indeed, vent fluids associated with serpentinization of ultramafic rocks at mid-ocean ridges are commonly enriched in CH4 and other short-chain hydrocarbons (Charlou et al. 2002; Proskurowski et al. 2008; McDermott et al. 2015; Lang et al. 2018; Johnson et al. 2015). However, the pathways and conditions of abiotic synthesis reactions remain incompletely understood.

is tied to the oxidation of ferrous to ferric iron by water. In the above reaction, FeO represents the ferrous iron component in olivine and pyroxene, and Fe2O3 represents the ferric iron component in product minerals. While the distribution and valence of iron among serpentine-group minerals (lizardite, chrysotile, antigorite), as well as other minor minerals (e.g., magnetite, brucite, and talc) (control the production of H2. The stability and composition of these minerals depends on protolith composition, alteration temperature, reaction kinetics, and composition of the reactant fluid. Thermodynamic reaction path models are useful to assess how mineral and rock composition affects H2 production (e.g., McCollom and Bach 2009; Klein et al. 2013). These models suggest that the production of H2 during serpentinization of peridotite, the most common ultramafic rock type in Earth’s upper mantle, peaks at temperatures of ~300–320°C. At higher temperatures, olivine is part of the equilibrium mineral assemblage, which limits the amount of oxidizable iron available for H2 generation. At lower temperatures, the amount of oxidizable iron available for H2 generation is limited by preferential partitioning of ferrous iron in brucite. Hydrothermal laboratory experiments support these findings, however, they highlight that reaction kinetics and hydrodynamic properties must be taken into account to evaluate the underlying processes of serpentinization and associated H2 production (Martin and Fyfe 1970; Allen and Seyfried 2003; Malvoisin and Brunet 2014; Klein et al. 2015; Lamadrid et al. 2017; Syverson et al. 2017; Escario et al. 2018).

Abiotic synthesis of hydrocarbons

In catalyzed reactions, methane can be formed through hydrogenation reactions, for example:


These reactions have been the focus of extensive research and technological development in chemical engineering since discovery (Sabatier and Senderens 1902; Rönsch et al. 2016).

Related to the CH4 forming Sabatier process (Reaction 3 above) is the Fischer-Tropsch type of reaction that produces a range of abiotic hydrocarbons via hydrogenation of CO with H2. This process can be generalized by the reaction:


The relative abundance of CH4, C2H6, C3H8, and other compounds follows a probabilistic distribution of molecular lengths, termed the Anderson-Schulz-Flory distribution (Anderson 1978). Together, methanation and the Fischer-Tropsch type processes have been suggested to explain the origin of CH4 and other hydro-carbons, however mass balance and stable and radiogenic isotope constraints suggest that dissolved inorganic carbon is not reduced to CH4 during convection of hydrothermal fluids (McDermott et al. 2015). Accordingly, CH4 formation is likely decoupled from convecting fluids and may occur, for instance, in fluid inclusions as one of us has recently suggested (Klein et al. 2019).

Regarding interconversions of small carbon compounds in hydrothermal fluids, methane formation occurs without mineral catalysts (Seewald et al. 2006), but the reactions are sluggish, in particular at low temperatures (McCollom 2016). For methanation to be more effective in an aqueous environment, catalysts are needed, often including nickel (Gadalla and Bower 1988; Horita and Berndt 1999; Miao et al. 2016). In these conditions several mechanisms may be possible (Fig. 2). Under hydrothermal conditions, the uncatalyzed reduction of CO2 to methanol (CH3OH) proceeds via a stepwise sequence of reactions that involve the formation of formic acid (HCOOH), CO, and possibly formaldehyde (CH2O), as intermediary reaction products (Seewald et al. 2006). However, kinetic barriers appear to inhibit the reduction of CH3OH to CH4 and allow the reaction intermediaries to accumulate in solution at high concentrations reaching metastable thermodynamic equilibrium (Seewald et al. 2006). Indeed, formate appears to form on short timescales during mixing of reducing hydrothermal fluids with seawater, whereas the formation of CH4 may take thousands of years (Lang et al. 2012; McDermott et al. 2015).

Methane formation appears to be significantly more efficient in the presence of a vapor phase (McCollom 2016). The preferred interpretation for this observation is that abiotic CH4 synthesis is promoted by the presence of a H2 vapor phase in direct contact with catalytic mineral surfaces without the interference of water molecules. In reaction fronts in serpentinizing environments, H2O consumption and H2 production from serpentinization can lead to H2 exsolution into a vapor phase, at least at low pressures, as indicated by pentlandite-awaruite-magnetite assemblages found in partially serpentinized rocks (Klein and Bach 2009). Although methanation of CO2 in a strongly reducing vapor phase seems feasible under specific conditions, radiocarbon data and mass balance constraints suggest that methanation of CO2 is relatively inefficient during hydrothermal circulation. Alternatively, abiotic CH4 can be leached from rock surfaces (Welhan 1988) or fluid inclusions (McDermott et al. 2015; McCollom 2016; Wang et al. 2018; Klein et al. 2019). Indeed, Klein et al. (2019) examined 160 olivine-bearing gabbros and peridotites from a wide range of geologic settings and found H2 and abiotic CH4 coexisting with serpentine, brucite, and magnetite within olivine-hosted secondary fluid inclusions in most of their samples. They estimated that fluid inclusions may store as much as 5 Pg of CH4 in oceanic crust and mantle formed at slow and ultraslow spreading ridges. The proposed pathways of CH4 formation in olivine-hosted fluid inclusions is as follows: Carbon-bearing aqueous fluids are trapped as secondary inclusions in olivine between ~800 and 400 °C and react with their olivine host upon cooling below 340 °C, which results in the formation of serpentine, brucite, magnetite, and H2. The production of H2 and concomitant consumption of liquid water by precipitation of hydrous minerals inside the inclusion creates conditions conducive to CO2 reduction to CH4. While CH4 and H2 can be stored over geological timescales within these inclusions, gases can be released during dissolution or fracturing of the olivine host. Remarkably, the stable isotope compositions of CH4 in vent fluids emanating from mafic- and ultramafic-hosted hydrothermal systems are virtually indistinguishable, calling for a common underlying process of CH4 formation (Wang et al. 2018). Because CH4-rich secondary fluid inclusions occur in olivine-bearing mafic and ultramafic rocks, they represent a common source of abiotic CH4 in both mafic- and ultramafic-hosted hydrothermal systems (Klein et al. 2019).

Collectively, abiotic hydrocarbon formation comprises a substantial carbon flow in submarine hydrothermal systems, continental gas seeps and alkaline springs, and even on other planetary bodies such as Mars and Enceladus (Horita and Berndt 1999; Charlou et al. 2002; Etiope and Sherwood Lollar 2013; Klein et al. 2019).

Other geologic contexts: Hydrogenation of inorganic metal carbonate

Interaction between metal carbonate minerals and H2 as shown in Equation 6 may represent an important process in planetary sciences, yet it remains poorly investigated under geological conditions. A comprehensive review on the subject was recently published (Lux et al. 2018).


Experimental investigations have been conducted over a wide range of temperature conditions between 200 to 900 °C, but most commonly at ambient pressure conditions, with the exception of the most recent studies reaching up to about 1.2 MPa (Baldauf-Sommerbauer et al. 2016). In a pure hydrogen atmosphere, hydrogenation may occur through different pathways as a function of several parameters including the amount and size of carbonate substratum, the nature of the metals involved, the presence of catalysts, temperature, and pressure. In the presence of water, hydrogenation can also happen as a result of thermal decomposition (Perry and Ahmad 1977; McCollom 2003; Tao et al. 2018). In this case, ferrous iron in carbonate (siderite) is oxidized to ferric iron in magnetite, generating H2 from water that subsequently hydrogenates CO2 to organic compounds.

Although some experimental results appear contradictory (see review by Lux et al. 2018), the aforementioned parameters influence the amount and rates of carbonate decomposition, as well as on the speciation of the produced fluid phase, with large deviations from the general equation reported above. The most common alkaline-earth metal carbonates calcite and dolomite (CaCO3, MgCO3) tend to produce CO2 and CO relative to CH4 or heavier hydrocarbons in the absence of catalysts such as Ni, Ir, Pd, and Co (Padeste et al. 1991; Reller et al. 1991; Yoshida et al. 1999; Baldauf-Sommerbauer et al. 2016). Transition metal carbonates, such as siderite (FeCO3), may produce CH4 during redox reactions involving Fe, or the catalytic effect of native metal/oxides forming during the carbonate dissociation (Giardini and Salotti 1969; Reller et al. 1991; Tsuneto et al. 1992). Both direct carbonate methanation, i.e., direct surface-gas reaction between carbonate minerals and H2 to form light molecular weight hydrocarbons such as CH4, and methanation mediated through an intermediate CO2- or CO+H2 interaction have been documented (Lux et al. 2018).

Lux et al. (2018) discussed the potential industrial and environmental implications of metal carbonate hydrogenation. Manifestations of these reactions in natural systems are still barely documented. Lazar et al. (2014) discussed the possible implications of carbonate reduction on carbon mobility in subduction zones based on experimental results (2–10 kbar; 300–700 °C in aqueous fluids with changing fO2) (Lazar et al. 2014). Giardini and Salotti (1969) and Salotti et al. (1971) discussed the potential role of this process on the abiotic formation of light hydrocarbons and solid organic C compounds in the Earth’s crust and in carbonaceous chondrites (Giardini and Salotti 1969; Salotti et al. 1971). Similarly, carbonate methanation has been proposed as a possible mechanism to produce abiotic CH4 at relatively high-pressure conditions in subduction zones (0.5–1 GPa; ~400°C) based on natural samples (Vitale Brovarone et al. 2017).

Hydrogenation of reduced C phases in the deep Earth

Hydrogenation/dehydrogenation reactions involving H2 and reduced C reservoirs, either solid (graphite, diamond, and carbides) or fluid (e.g., CH4), are also proposed to regulate recycling of C in the deep Earth. The equilibrium participation of elemental C, H2, and CH4 is classically included among the reactions regulating fluid-rock equilibria involving C, O, and H in the so-called COH system (Deines 1980; Connolly 1995), following the reaction:


For example, pyrolitic dissociation of CH4 to form graphite and H2 was proposed (Salotti et al. 1971) as a mechanism generating massive graphite deposits. The significance of this reaction in geological systems has been questioned based on the rarity of H2-rich fluids in geological systems (Rumble and Hoering 1986). The reverse reaction, the abiotic generation of CH4 through C hydrogenation, may occur in graphite-bearing metamorphosed ultramafic rocks percolated by H2-rich geological fluids (Vitale Brovarone et al. 2017), suggesting that reaction 7 may be achieved in nature. Furthermore, immiscibility of H2 in aqueous fluids at upper mantle conditions, as demonstrated by experimental results (Bali et al. 2013), may favor the geological occurrence of H2-mineral reactions (Griffin et al. 2018). The kinetics of graphite hydrogenation has been extensively investigated in material sciences at low-pressure conditions (Goethel and Yang 1988). In the deep Earth, the significance and kinetics of these reactions remain barely known. Hydrogenation/dehydrogenation of reduced C phases may extend to higher-pressure conditions and involve diamond or metal carbide precipitation/dissolution. The potential role of CH4 dehydrogenation on diamond formation through the latter reaction is known (Deines 1980) and might explain the origin of some CH4-deposited natural diamonds reported in the literature (Thomassot et al. 2007; Smit et al. 2016). Interactions between iron carbides and H+ are also proposed to produce hydrocarbons (Lai 2007), but the significance of this reaction in deep terrestrial conditions remains unclear.

Hydrogenations concerning iron carbonyls and metal sulfides with relevance to prebiotic chemistry

Life as we know it links energy released during electron transfer reactions to cell activity, and hydrogenation reactions are a widespread mechanism of this. It has even been suggested that a primary role of life is to hydrogenate CO2 (Nitschke and Russell 2009). Before the formation of the first cells, hydrogenation reactions would have been important for the formation and interconversion of carbon molecules of intermediate redox states. Since CO2 reduction involves hydrogenation, it is required for all CO2-fixing life, and many reactions in modern metabolisms are either hydrogenation or dehydrogenation reactions. The same would likely be true of any early metabolism. Of relevance to primordial CO2 fixation, the hydrogenation of CO2 leading to formate/CO could represent a source of reduced carbon compounds, potentially present in geologic environments such as during volcanic outgassing into the deep sea (Cadle 1980). At 0.2 GPa and 250 °C, traces of pyruvic acid have been detected in laboratory experiments iron monosulfide (FeS) serving as the reductant (Cody et al. 2000). This reaction has been suggested to proceed through the formation of iron carbonyl complexes and subsequent reduction of CO with H2, which was produced through the oxidation of sulfide:


Huber and Wächtershauser showed that CO can react with methane thiol to form the “activated” thioester methyl-thioacetate (CH3COSCH3) (Huber and Wächtershäuser 1997), mimicking the biological process (for review, see Bender et al. 2011). They also showed that CO can form COS, which subsequently activates amino acids at the amine position, leading to their polymerization (Huber and Wächtershäuser 1998). It seems that hydrogenation of CO2 with H2 to form CO [which can equilibrate with formate (HCO2) through hydration] could be a powerful harbinger of reactions relevant to early life, and these hydrogenations may have been performed by the first cells (Russell and Martin 2004; Ferry and House 2006).

C-C bond formation starting from CO2 can be achieved with suitable catalysts and electron donors at modest temperatures and pressures. Metallic iron has been shown to facilitate the reduction of CO2 to acetate with E0′ = –0.29V (Thauer et al. 1977) vs. the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) at pH 7 (He et al. 2010; Muchowska et al. 2017; Varma et al. 2018). But due to the lability of Fe0 forming less reducing iron species in water, it is important to consider how electrons might continually reduce CO2 with some specificity rather than simply reducing protons to H2 and exhausting the reducing potential supplied.

Serpentinizing systems in some situations may provide a constant supply of H2 and HS that form iron sulfide mineral phases reminiscent of tetragonal FeS cluster found in redox active enzymes (Mielke et al. 2010). A hint of the importance of these FeS clusters might be found in a synthetic analog of the [2Fe2S] cofactor clusters found in contemporary biology, which has been shown to facilitate reductive carboxylations (Fig. 3) (Nakajima et al. 1975). This reaction relies on sodium hydrosulfite as a reductant with E′ ~ –0.66V vs. SHE at pH 7 (Mayhew 1978) and was observed in solutions of tetrahydrofuran, methanol, and water. Possibly linking soluble carbon chemistry with insoluble minerals, metal sulfides have been shown to reduce CO2 electro-chemically (Yamaguchi et al. 2014; Kitadai et al. 2018). Figure 1 depicts schematically the reduction of CO2 to CH4 in one electron reduction steps on a metal electrode. Depending on the electrode material, the reduction steps below CO can branch off into the production of methanol or C2 compounds (Nie et al. 2013).

A very brief overview of hydrogenation in biology: Energy and anabolism

Electron transfer reactions in the cell can be linked to respiratory processes, such as the hydrogenation of O2 or sulfate to produce water or HS, respectively. In respiration, work is done as electrons move from a more negative potential to a more positive potential. In another mode of electron transfer that can involve hydrogenation reactions, a molecule can be reduced or oxidized as part of a biosynthetic pathway to construct a cell. In this case, the primary purpose is not energy harvesting, but bio-molecular construction, and biologists refer to this as anabolism.

In the case of H2, some organisms may oxidize it, and yet others may form it and release it. Whether H2 is consumed or produced in a metabolism is related to the thermodynamic tendency (i.e., electrochemical potential) of molecules other than hydrogen to acquire electrons from H2, or deliver them to protons. For example, if an organism is utilizing O2 as an electron acceptor in the presence of H2, there will be a tendency to pull electrons off of H2 and combine them with O2. Oxygen is such a powerful oxidant, that it “pulls” electrons from hydrogen even at non-measurable concentrations (Inskeep et al. 2005). To predict which direction electron transfer and hydrogenation reactions may occur it is useful to consider which molecules donate and accept electrons in and out of a given metabolism.

Many biological hydrogenations occur without the formation or consumption of H2. These are transfer hydrogenations, since they involve the gain or loss of hydrogen but do not directly involve H2 gas. For example, the ketone group of pyruvate can be reduced by two electrons to form the alcohol group of lactate (the reaction is illustrated in the center of Fig. 1). The electron donor and hydrogenating agent in the reaction may be the reduced form of the enzyme cofactor nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), a biological two electron carrier (also shown in Fig. 1). This important electron carrier operates in biochemistry with the half cell reaction stoichiometry shown in Figure 4. Here the movement of the proton to and from nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) occurs in the form of a hydride (H). Other electron carriers such as flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) and the iron sulfur cluster containing protein ferredoxin operate in transfer hydrogenation reactions in the cell, and these molecules give cells a common electronic “currency.”

Case study: CO2 hydrogenation to formate

In biology, CO2 is hydrogenated to formic acid (HCOOH) by several enzymes, including the enzyme hydrogen-dependent carbon dioxide reductase (HDCR) (Schuchmann and Müller 2013) and formate dehydrogenase (FDH) (Appel et al. 2013) (Fig. 5). This reaction type of CO2 hydrogenation is the first in the carbon metabolism of the globally important methanogens and acetogens (Thauer 1998; Thauer et al. 2008; Schuchmann and Müller 2014), although instead of catalyzing the production of formate, the biological enzymes catalyze the formation of carbon complexed on an organic scaffold that is sequentially reduced in the cell (for review, see Maden 2000). These methane- and acetate-forming organisms live in anoxic environments and couple the exergonic reduction (hydrogenation) of CO2 to either methane or acetate to their growth. Interestingly, in reverse, acetate and methane can be used as metabolic fuel during anaerobic methane oxidation and anaerobic acetate oxidation depending on the availability of an electron acceptor of sufficient redox potential to make the net reactions favorable (Hattori 2008; Thauer 2011; McGlynn 2017).

Abiotic CO2 reduction to formate and other reduced carbon species is of substantial interest for sustainable chemistry goals (Gurudayal et al. 2017; Wei et al. 2017) and has been investigated extensively by electrochemical means (Hori 2008). In addition to electrochemically driven reactions, CO2 reduction to formate can take place at near ambient P-T conditions with synthetic organometallic cofactors (e.g., Jószai and Joó 2007), or with natural minerals and metals at slightly higher T-P conditions (see Methanation section above).

Energy Conservation in the Biological Cell 101

All life requires energy for maintenance and replication. Biologists commonly refer to the process of cellular energy harvesting as “conservation.” When they say this, they are not referring to the first law of thermodynamics! Energy conservation in biology refers to conversion; in the cell, it is about converting one form of energy to another. This conversion allows biology to temporarily capture energy, and divert it to cellular processes and functions. Biologists often consider “energy-rich” molecules such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP), though the energy “available” from these molecules is directly related to their concentration difference from that at equilibrium. In the case of ATP, the energy available is directly proportional to the concentrations of ATP and ADP, which are respectively the hydrolysis substrate, and product in the cell. ATP hydrolysis can be coupled to another chemical reaction that would otherwise be unfavorable.

Another form of “energy storage” or “energy harvesting” is by chemiosmosis, which involves coupling a chemical reaction to the movement of ions (often protons or sodium) across the membrane. Later, this offset in ion concentrations can be used to “push” a different reaction forward (for example, achieving a large offset in the concentration of ATP and ADP in the cell). In a classic and very valuable paper, Thauer et al. (1977) outlined how chemical potentials could be connected to cell growth and physiology.

How is all this connected to hydrogenation? All known life couples electron transfer reactions to maintenance and replication (often through ATP as an intermediate). Since hydrogenation is one of the basic routes of moving electrons from one molecule to another, they are of basic importance to biology. In the cell, electron transfer reactions such as hydrogenation can be linked, or coupled to other reactions that allow the cell to conserve energy and propagate.

In glycolysis, a central sugar metabolizing arm of metabolism, the intermediate glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate is oxidized and results in the formation of a phosphoester bond, which can be used subsequently to form ATP from ADP:

 Glyceraldehyde-3Phosphate +NAD++Phosphate 1-3Bis-phosphoglycerate + NADH

These reactions are examples of how hydrogenation and dehydrogenation reactions are coupled to energy harvesting; an aldehyde is dehydrogenated, making possible the formation of a phosphoester compound. This latter compound can then go on and drive reactions such as ATP formation, and ATP is used broadly as a contributor of exergonic chemical potential in reactions.

In addition to sugars, organisms also synthesize amino acids and fatty acids through hydrogenations; in reverse, these molecules are oxidized by dehydrogenation. In addition to the water soluble hydrogenations noted above, an important class of fat soluble biomolecules, such as quinones and methanophenazine, allow for electron and proton entry (and exit) into biological lipid membranes, by acting as agents of trans hydrogenation (for example, see Duszenko and Buan 2017). The ability to move charge into and across the membrane is one way that life accomplishes charge separation in chemiosmosis and temporarily captures energy for cellular processes, and again this example shows how critical hydrogenation reactions are in biological systems, which themselves are electronic. A basic schematic of one way biology uses these fat soluble transfer-hydrogenation reactions to build up a membrane spanning ion potential is shown in Figure 6. There, we can see a cartoon diagram of a cell membrane with two enzyme complexes embedded in the membrane. By having each enzyme catalyze a separate hydrogenation, and by sharing a common electronic intermediate (here drawn as “Q/QH2,” the cell is able to accomplish asymmetric charge movement across the membrane). This charge builds up and is later on utilizable in the form of an energy storage system in a process called “chemiosmosis.”

Figure 6.

A “redox loop” mechanism coupling hydrogenation reactions to chemiosmosis in biology. Hydrogenation of quinol (Q) inside the cell membrane (gray) by H2, and subsequent trans-hydrogenation of an intracellular electron acceptor (R), lead to charge separation across a biological membrane and the buildup of a chemiosmotic potential. Negative charge (electrons) goes in, positive charge (protons) go out. Variations on this theme are observed in biology; this figure represents one example as a starting point for deeper inquiry. The interested reader is directed to an excellent review (Simon et al. 2008).

Figure 6.

A “redox loop” mechanism coupling hydrogenation reactions to chemiosmosis in biology. Hydrogenation of quinol (Q) inside the cell membrane (gray) by H2, and subsequent trans-hydrogenation of an intracellular electron acceptor (R), lead to charge separation across a biological membrane and the buildup of a chemiosmotic potential. Negative charge (electrons) goes in, positive charge (protons) go out. Variations on this theme are observed in biology; this figure represents one example as a starting point for deeper inquiry. The interested reader is directed to an excellent review (Simon et al. 2008).

Hydrogenations occurring in the atmosphere

Hydrogenation reactions in planetary atmospheres may have played an important role for the reduction of simple carbon species such as CO2 and CO, and for CH4 oxidation through dehydrogenation. In modern Earth’s oxidizing atmosphere, hydrogenation of CO2 and CO rarely occurs, and thus is not well understood. On the other hand, in reducing atmospheres, potentially like that of the early Earth and Mars, hydrogenation of CO2 and CO could be initiated from UV photo-dissociation of H2O and CO2:


where represents <200 nm ultraviolet light. The back reaction of R13 is very slow, and thus the oxidation of CO largely proceeds through the reaction with OH radical:


However, when the atmosphere is reducing, hydrogenation of CO could form formyl radical (HCO) and then formaldehyde (HCHO), mainly through the following reactions (Pinto et al. 1980):


where M represents any third-body reaction partner.

Once the HCO and HCHO are formed, several successive radical chain reactions can occur. Several laboratory experiments have demonstrated that not only formaldehyde, but also acetaldehyde, methanol, and carboxylic acids are synthesized by UV irradiation of CO-bearing atmosphere under the presence of water vapor (Bar-Nun and Chang 1983; Kawade 2018). The reaction pathways to produce these compounds from HCHO is largely uncertain, though possibly proceed through the following reactions:


These studies suggest that the abiotic synthesis of simple organic compounds is possible particularly when the H/OH ratio is high (i.e., reducing atmosphere), because hydrogenation of CO (R15) is faster than the oxidation of CO (R14). Therefore, the production rate of these organics largely depends on total redox state of the atmosphere.

On early Earth and Mars, the most abundant and efficient reducing agent may have been H2 and possibly CH4, which can scavenge excess OH and thus buffer the reducing atmosphere. In an H2-rich and/or CH4-rich atmosphere, however, hydrogen escape into space is more efficient than oxidizing atmosphere. This is because H2 and CH4 are efficient carriers of hydrogen to the top of the atmosphere, whereas H2O is not, owing to condensation in the mid part of the atmosphere. Consequently, escape rate of hydrogen is high in a reducing atmosphere, which results in faster oxidation of the atmosphere in a geological timescale.


Abiotic reactions and their pathways involving hydrogenation/dehydrogenation can be challenging to identify due to the abundance of oxygen in geological fluids in the upper mantle, crust, and atmosphere. Several reactions mentioned in this article are rarely observed in natural settings as written, and they represent simplifications and/or intermediates of more complex aqueous solutions and reaction pathways. Exceptions may exist in settings where reducing conditions can be achieved and maintained over significant timescales. In the lithosphere, hydrothermal alteration of ultramafic rocks, or serpentinization, is certainly among the best candidates, even though our understanding of these systems is still largely incomplete and may incorporate other H2 generating processes such as radio-lytic and mechanochemical splitting of water. Hydrogenation reactions in the deep Earth, such as in the mantle, may be more common because oxygen fugacity decreases with depth. Great effort is still demanded to understand hydrogenation/dehydrogenation processes and their role over the Earth’s history. The potential outcomes of future research span critical features of science and modern society, such as global climate changes and the emergence/sustainability of life on our planet and beyond (Gurudayal et al. 2017). Over the past decade, experimental and theoretical studies have made great strides forward toward a better understanding of the past and present of geochemistry. In the coming decade, we should learn more about the impact of hydrogenation/dehydrogenation reactions on our planet and the mechanisms of their occurence.


S.E.M. is supported by NSF Award 1724300 and JSPS KAKENHI Grant JP18H01325. A.V.B. is supported by ANR T-ERC, CNRS INSU-SYSTER, and Rita Levi Montalcini by MIUR. J.B.G. is supported by NASA Exobiology Grant NNX14AJ87G and 80NSSC19K0477. F.K. is supported by NSF-OCE award 1634032 and 1427274. M.O.S. is supported by the NASA Astrobiology Institute Rock-Powered Life Grant NNA15BB02A.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 License, which permits users to copy and redistribute the work, provided this is not done for commercial purposes and further does not permit distribution of the work if it is changed or edited in any way, and provided that the user gives appropriate credit, provides a link to the license, and that the licensor is not represented as endorsing use of the work.Open access: Article available to all readers online. This article is CC BY-NC-ND.