Abstract
We discuss differences between the bulk etch rate (νB) and an alternative radial etch rate (νR) model for fission-track etching in apatite. A skeletal νR-model, based on the inferred orientations of the νR minima and maxima, accounts for the main geometrical features of etched fission tracks, including the track-surface intersections, track channels and their terminations, and the outlines of confined tracks. It unifies the diverse appearances of etched tracks as variations of a basic plan, governed by the orientation of the etched surface and that of the track. The νR-model also embeds fission-track etching in the mainstream theories of crystal growth and dissolution. However, in contrast to the νB-model, the νR-model does not provide bottom-up criteria for discriminating between tracks that are counted by an observer or a computer program and those that are not. Moreover, abandoning the νB-model implies that basic assumptions of fission-track dating must be reconsidered, in particular that track counting efficiencies depend only on a critical dip angle, and are thus independent of the track registration geometry and the length distribution.