The publisher apologies for an error introduced during production in the section of text on p. 10 under the heading “(v) The option that various structural variations within the samples could take place”, in paragraph six.

The published text reads:

“For possibility (b), the major celestines with the disregarded gypsum or anhydrite phases, the results in Supplementary Tables S10 and S16 demonstrate that there is a slightly different ratio between various crystallographic axes, such as c0 < a0 <b0 (samples 1 and 4), a0 < c0 <b0 (samples 2 and...

View Original Article
You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.