Energy Modelling in Minerals
The present book shows the arguments which have been considered in the EMU School (No. 4), dealing with Energy Modelling in Minerals; these arguments have been selected in order to provide examples of application of the most advanced theories to several cases. It should be pointed out that although the ultimate solution of our problems should involve “ab initio” quantum-mechanical calculations, at present such sophisticated procedures are far from being routine. Therefore, although “ab initio” approaches will play an ever-increasing role in the future and some important and most recent examples of such approaches are illustrated here, the greatest part of the contributions is dealing with empirical atom-atom calculations. Remarkably enough, such “semi-empirical” applications are often quite successful, providing excellent (or comparatively excellent) results in spite of their more or less approximate nature. It often happens that the methods here illustrated are some steps ahead of the current level of empirical treatment, thereby indicating a possible way of improvement by figuring out routines to be adopted in practice. If some methods seem to be too speculative to be actually usable, here they also are shown, in view of their possible discussion, or just to indicate a way to obtain promising developments. Among the descriptions of practical methods and results, some purely theoretical arguments have been inserted; these arguments — although abstract — according to our opinion are fundamental for earth scientists. Owing to the present status of the art, in a number of arguments there is no unique opinion with respect to their theoretical treatment as it is explained by different authors. Instead of having all of them discarded except the one which looks to be the most appropriate to the Editor (who might sometimes be personally involved in the question), most of such controversial points have been left just as they are, in the original draft of their advocates. Accordingly, the reader might find some discrepancies between some articles and others, which may lead to some obscurity; there are, however, several good reasons in favour of our behaviour. First of all, with a few exceptions we apologize about, our attention in inviting the contributors has been extended to all the principal authors in the world, with no limitation to a group of particular friends; moreover, the presence of different opinions in the context might give rise to interesting debates and critical objections; a further point is that the validity of the different treatments is shown per se by either the level of the theory and most of all by the agreement with the corresponding experimental data. Since we have to do with an advanced school, and in line with what should be a scientific procedure, it is important to provide the user with the possibility of choosing what seems to be the most appropriate method among a number of selected possibilities, rather than yielding to the assertion that something is indeed the ultimate and unquestionable “truth”.
Thermochemistry, energetic modelling and systematic
Published:January 01, 2002
Experimental thermochemistry provides data on heat capacities, entropies, enthalpies of phase transitions, and enthalpies of formation of minerals and other materials relevant to the Earth Sciences. Such data can be used to construct empirical models of systematic trends and to benchmark models and first principles calculations. This paper provides a summary of the capabilities of modern experimental techniques and focuses on three case studies (lanthanide and actinide oxide materials, perovskites and nanomaterials) which link calorimetric data and computational predictions.
Thermodynamics plays a twofold role in the science of minerals and materials. At the macroscopic level, thermodynamic parameters provide a description of the equilibrium state of complex multicomponent systems, enabling the calculation of crystallisation and melting relations, aqueous solubility, ordering, exsolution, solid solution formation, phase transformation and other processes relevant to the evolution of phase chemistry with composition, pressure, temperature and, in some cases, time. On the microscopic level, energetics provide insight into the strengths of chemical bonds, the nature of lattice vibrations and processes involving the ordering of atoms, electrons and spins. In the latter sense, thermodynamics can be viewed as a crude form of spectroscopy, smeared out over the frequency domain, and coming out with values of energy, heat capacity and entropy which reflect the most important interatomic interactions, averaged by nature. This averaging is the strength of thermodynamics; it assesses the net effect of many competing interactions. The real thermodynamic parameter, when correctly measured, provides a comparison and benchmark for theory, which uses, of necessity, simplified models of interatomic interactions, whether by using