Abstract
An avoidable compounding of procedural and conceptual errors led to the generally held yet erroneous conclusion that “lyndochite” is equivalent to aeschynite-(Y). Instead, “lyndochite” is a minor chemical variety of euxenite-(Y), a conclusion reinforced by modern anecdotal and scientific evidence.
Abstract
Des erreurs procédurales et conceptuelles composées qui auraient bien pu être évitées ont mené à la conclusion que la “lyndochite” est synonyme de l’aeschynite-(Y). Au contraire, la “lyndochite” serait une variante de l’euxenite-(Y), selon l’évidence anecdotique et scientifique moderne.
You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.