Dragastanella transylvanica n. gen. n. sp. is described. Its calcified skeleton contains numerous voids, partly related to the molds of soft parts of the alga, but also related to lack of calcification. Interpretation of these voids, especially their attribution to original structures (e.g., primary lateral versus reproductive organ), has important implications for the taxonomic position of the alga, even at the family level. Examination of key sections that include the boundary between sterile and fertile parts of the alga excludes the occurrence of external reproductive organs. Unusual, paired pores in the outer part of the mineralized skeleton reflect an asymmetry within the whorl, excluding the presence of secondary laterals. The alga is characterized by a cylindrical to club-shaped thallus bearing only phloiophorous primary laterals arranged in whorls and flaring outwards, forming a cortex. Mineralized lenticular reproductive organs containing cysts set in the equatorial plane (Russoella-type gametophores) occur inside primary laterals (cladosporous arrangement of the reproductive organs). These characters support establishment of the new genus Dragastanella. Dragastanella transylvanica n. gen. n. sp. resembles species previously referred to Zittelina (Zittelina hispanica and Zittelina massei) and Triploporella (Triploporella matesina and Triploporella carpatica). Except for Triploporella carpatica, whose mineralized skeleton does not permit confident attribution to either Triploporella or Dragastanella n. gen., the other species must be ascribed to Dragastanella n. gen. Therefore, the following new combinations are proposed: Dragastanella hispanica n. comb., Dragastanella massei n. comb., and Dragastanella matesina n. comb. Despite widely overlapping biometrical measurements, these species can be differentiated by the size and location of their reproductive organs, the pattern of calcification around the primary laterals, and relationships among structural parameters such as the size of laterals, number of laterals per whorl, and distance between whorls.
Fossil Dasycladales are commonly preserved as external calcified molds of their soft parts. The way in which the calcium carbonate envelops the alga reflects the thallus anatomy. For such specimens, the calcareous skeleton constitutes the only information concerning the anatomical elements of the alga in fossil material. The moldic nature of dasycladalean calcification emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting the origins of voids within the calcareous skeleton (Barattolo, 2019). A key question is whether cavities reflect original soft parts or result from a deficiency in calcification? This is especially important when such cavities involve reproductive organs obliterating the relationship between the reproductive organs and the laterals. This can significantly affect systematic determinations. The new taxa described here particularly illustrate the taxonomic problems related to the interpretation of skeletal cavities in calcified dasycladaleans.
The Perșani Mountains form the southwestern sector of the Eastern Carpathians, at their junction with the Southern Carpathians (Fig. 1.1). From a structural point of view, they belong to the Median Dacides (Săndulescu, 1984) and share similar structural characteristics with the Rarău and Hăghimaș massifs, two other units belonging to the Median Dacides of the Eastern Carpathians. Two main structural units are recognized in the Perșani Mountains: the Bucovinian and Transylvanian nappes. Upper Aptian Urgonian limestones and conglomerates cover the Bucovinian and Transylvanian units and form the first part of the post-nappe cover (Patrulius et al., 1966).
Upper Aptian limestones crop out in five areas in the central-southern sector of the Perșani Mountains (Fig. 1.2): Fântâna (A), Trestia (B, C), Comana (D, E), Gârbova (F), and Mănăstirii Valley (G). In the Fântâna area (Fig. 2), the carbonate rocks consist of a reddish to yellowish limestone covering red clays. A 70 m thick succession contains coral-rudist boundstone, orbitolinid-bearing wackestone–packstone, bioclastic packstone–floatstone with coral and rudist fragments, intraclastic bioclastic grainstone–rudstone, and partially fenestral bindstone–packstone. The fossil association comprises corals, calcareous algae, and benthic foraminifera (including Mesorbitolina texana [Roemer, 1849]), as well as encrusting organisms and incertae sedis.
Sample 901 contains the majority of Triploporellaceae species presented in this study (Fig. 2). It also contains Neomeris cretacea Steinmann, 1899, Polystrata alba (Pfender, 1936), Girvanella sp., Terquemella sp., Akcaya minuta (Hofker, 1965), Ammobaculites sp., Coscinophragma cribrosa (Reuss, 1846), Charentia cuvillieri Neumann, 1965, and “Coptocampylodon” fontis Patrulius, 1965. The presence of the orbitolinid Mesorbitolina texana indicates a late Aptian age of these limestone deposits.
Material and methods
Most of the algal specimens obtained are contained in 155 thin sections of limestone labeled PSM 901-1 through 901-155. A few specimens are from samples 896 and F53. The algal specimens were observed by optical stereomicroscope and photographed and measured under a petrographic microscope. An identification number has been assigned to each of the 121 specimens.
Some values of the number of laterals in a whorl (w) have been estimated according to methods discussed in Barattolo et al. (2019, supplemental data). The height between whorls (h) has been obtained through a procedure provided in the supplemental data.
Repositories and institutional abbreviations
PSM, Palaeontology-Stratigraphy Museum in the Geology Department of the Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca (Romania). DiSTAR, Department of Earth Sciences Environment and Resources, University of Naples Federico II.
Deciphering voids and taxonomic implication
The abundant algal material analyzed shows mineralized skeletons with a wide range of cavities whose shape could lead to differing interpretations. Some structural interpretations may be almost irrelevant to the systematics and are only part of a more complete understanding of the alga. Conversely, the adoption of other interpretations can have important implications for the taxonomic position of the alga, even at the family level. Here, we focus on the interpretation of voids that may have significant taxonomic implications. These mainly refer to primary-pore/reproductive-organ relationships and pores adjacent to the outer surface. Oblique and tangential-oblique sections often provide a key understanding of the structure of the alga (De Castro, 1997; Barattolo et al., 2019). Serial sections of voids throw light on their nature and shape. Moreover, the transitional region encompassing the lower sterile and upper fertile parts can reveal how early reproductive elements were added to the basic vegetative framework of the alga. We therefore specifically chose two sections, one tangential-oblique (thin section PSM 901-104, specimen N122) and the other oblique (thin section PSM 901-104, specimen N089), cutting through or very close to the sterile-fertile boundary in the lower part of the thallus.
Primary laterals and reproductive organs
The tangential-oblique section (thin section PSM 901-104, specimen N122, Fig. 3.4) is clearly truncated downwards where two whorls of sterile laterals are intercepted (rows of circular pores). Around the periphery only single pores, not grouped in clusters, can be observed. They widen outwards, implying a phloiophorous shape. From the fourth to the eighth whorl, reproductive organs are clearly visible inside larger irregular voids. The third and the fourth whorls show irregularly shaped pores. Many of them, termed eight-shaped pores, are vertically elongated and separated by constrictions. These latter pores, combined with the larger irregular voids, can be variously interpreted. Here we consider three different interpretations (Fig. 3.1–3.3), and as many corresponding appearances in axial section (Figs. 4.1–4.3). For the sake of discussion, these are referred to as Hypothesis A, B, and C, respectively.
Hypothesis A (Fig. 3.1)
Pores and voids are interpreted as molds of primary laterals (cladospore interpretation, Fig. 4.1). Eight-shaped pores, filled by micrite, are assumed to be the result of an incipient swelling that hosted reproductive organs. The middle widening of primary pores, together with the intervening deficiency in mineralization, gives the impression of large irregular voids. According to these attributes, the taxon must be attributed to the family Triploporellaceae.
Hypothesis B (Fig. 3.2)
Pores and voids are interpreted as molds of small primary laterals, each bearing a large lateral gametophore containing cystophores (goniospore interpretation, Fig. 4.2). Eight-shaped pores are assumed, corresponding to the stalks of gametophores proximally joined to the primary lateral. The dense package of primary laterals and gametophores produces compound pores (Barattolo, 2019). In this case, the specimen must be attributed to genus Bakalovaella, and referred to the family Dasycladaceae (Granier and Bucur, 2019).
Hypothesis C (Fig. 3.3)
Pores and voids are interpreted as molds of small primary laterals and empty spaces, respectively. Cystophores are thought to be external gametophores attached sideways to primary laterals (goniospore interpretation, Fig. 4.3). Eight-shaped pores are assumed to correspond to primary lateral adjacent to an empty space. The dense package of primary laterals and gametophores produces compound pores (Barattolo, 2019). The irregular large voids are the result of primary pores fused to cavities by a deficiency in calcification (annular channels; Barattolo, 2019). Based on this hypothesis, the taxon should be assigned to the family Bornetellaceae (Granier and Bucur in Granier et al., 2013).
The regular large elliptical pores joined by oblique channels, shown in the center of Figure 3.4, exclude Hypothesis C (Fig. 4.3). The eight-shaped pores tend to support Hypothesis B (Fig. 4.2), but the largest elliptical pores lack any sign of subdivision. In this view, Hypothesis A (Fig. 4.1) appears the most likely option and is therefore adopted here.
Secondary laterals versus asymmetry
The oblique section of thin section PSM 901-104, specimen N089 (Fig. 5.1), shows weak evidence of inner eight-shaped pores (right side of the fifth whorl). Conversely, eight-shaped pores frequently occur in the middle and outer part of the section (see second and third whorl). With respect to Figure 3.4, Figure 5.1 exhibits two pairs of pores at the lower margin (right side of first whorl; see also the interpretive drawing, Fig. 5.2). The intercepts of the sixth (Fig. 6.1, w1) and first (Fig. 6.1, w2) whorls in the corresponding transverse section are depicted in Figure 6.3 and Figure 6.4, respectively. The distal eight-shaped pores (Fig. 6.1), doubling the inner single pores (Fig. 6.5), are usually interpreted as the occurrence of secondary laterals (Fig. 6.7). In the systematics, such a choice between one or two orders of laterals has a genus level implication. In this case, the distal eight-shaped pores can be deciphered differently. The first and second whorls (Fig. 6.1) are atypical if compared with the symmetrical succeeding ones (e.g., third to sixth whorls). The latter whorls reflect the typical radial symmetry of dasycladaleans, even though the pores increase in size from left to right in the first two whorls. This could be interpreted as being a result of asymmetrical swelling of primary laterals within the whorl. This bulge is most likely reduced or absent in one sector, while gradually extending outwards in the adjacent one (Fig. 6.6, 6.8). This appears to occur in the whorls of the transitional band between the sterile and fertile region (Fig. 6.2, w2).
Asymmetrical whorls can be observed in extant and ancient taxa at the sterile/fertile boundary (e.g., Cymopolia barbata [Linnaeus, 1758] Lamouroux, 1816 [Berger and Kaever, 1992, fig. 2.25b]; Triploporella praturlonii Barattolo, 1982b, pl. 3, fig.1, third whorl from below; Zittelina massei Bucur, Granier, and Săsăran, 2010, fig. 5e, third whorl from below; Batophora oerstedii Agardh, 1854 [Berger, 2006, p. 55, fig. 22; sketched in transverse view in Fig. 7.1]; and Cymopolia mayaense Johnson and Kaska, 1965 [Fig. 7.2]). Most examples pertain to taxa with terminal gametophores (choristosporous taxa). Vegetative elements (laterals) maintain similar size all around the whorl, but only a few bear gametophores. Correspondingly, in cladosporous forms, some laterals can remain sterile while others may be variously swollen by hosting reproductive organs. Distal eight-shaped pores are observed in very few specimens, in comparison to the great majority of single, well-spaced pores. All of them can be due to the effect of asymmetry. Thus, we interpret the present taxon as shown in Figure 4.1.
Order Dasycladales Pascher, 1931,
Family Triploporellaceae (Pia, 1920) Berger and Kaever, 1992,
Tribe Salpingoporelleae Pia, 1920
Genus Dragastanella new genus
Dragastanella transylvanica n. gen. n. sp.; Aptian, Perşani Mountains (Braşov district, Romania).
Cylindrical to club-shaped thallus. Euspondyl, phloiophorous primary laterals making cortex. Russoella-type reproductive organs (gametophores) inside primary laterals (cladosporous type).
Dedicated to Prof. Ovidiu Dragastan for his important contributions to the study of fossil calcareous algae.
The new genus Dragastanella shows the closest affinities with Triploporella Steinmann, 1880 emend. Barattolo, 1981. Dragastanella n. gen. has only first-order laterals, forming a cortex outward; thus, the primary laterals have both the reproductive and assimilative roles. Conversely, in Triploporella, there are two orders of laterals. This key difference between Triploporella and Dragastanella n. gen. is sufficient to separate the two genera. Pseudotriploporella Jaffrezo et al. (1980) was also supposed to differ from the genus Triploporella Steinmann, 1880 because it has only primary laterals. However, Granier and Deloffre (1993, p. 23–24) showed that Pseudotriploporella imecikae Jaffrezo, Poisson, and Akbulut, 1980, type species of the genus, and Triploporella sp., occurring in the same sample, belong to a single taxon. Therefore, Pseudotriploporella imecikae has primary and secondary laterals, and consequently Granier and Deloffre (1993, p. 24) transferred it to the genus Triploporella. As a result, the genus Pseudotriploporella is a junior synonym of Triploporella. The new genus Dragastanella, as herein established, includes characters earlier assigned to Pseudotriploporella.
Dragastanella n. gen. shares the occurrence of only phloiophorous primary laterals with Zittelina Morellet and Morellet (1913) and Salpingoporella Pia (1918). Zittelina has long and thin primary laterals that support external gametophores (gonioporate reproduction). On the other hand, Salpingoporella shows primary laterals that are thin and lack reproductive bodies; endosporate reproduction is inferred.
Based on the presence of phloiophorous primary laterals arranged in whorls, and containing mineralized lenticular Russoella-like cystophores (cladosporous type), Dragastanella n. gen. is assigned to the family Triploporellaceae.
Dragastanella transylvanica new species
Figures 3–6, 8–12
Holotype: axial section (Fig. 8.1), PSM 901-16. Paratypes: specimens contained in the thin sections, PSM 901-1 through PSM 901-155. Upper Aptian, reddish limestones with Mesorbitolina texana. The outcrop is located in the central-southern Perşani Mountains near Fântâna village, coordinates 45°57'32.89"N, 25°18'6.75"E (Fig. 1).
Simple, large, cylindrical to slightly club-shaped thallus, wide central cavity. The primary laterals are moderately long and phloiophorous. Each primary lateral can be subdivided into three parts: (1) inner subcylindrical tract, ~15–20% of the total length, markedly expanding inward; (2) middle, large fertile tract, ~65–70% of the total length, developing upward as a laterally compressed ellipsoidal bulge; and (3) outer tract, similar in size to the inner tract, flared outward and making a cortex distally. Primary laterals are arranged in close whorls (euspondyl), 33–66 per whorl, and alternating in position between subsequent whorls. The primary laterals are orthogonal in the lower part of the calcareous skeleton, but inclined at 80° in the middle and upper parts, with the inclination gradually decreasing so that they are upright at the top. Reproductive organs consist of mineralized gametophores located inside the primary laterals (cladosporous type), particularly confined in the upper part of the reproductive space. Cystophores are lenticular in shape and contain three to five, seldom six, cysts arranged in the equatorial plane. The calcified skeleton usually extends from next to the central stem to the distal outer part of the primary laterals before the cortical widening. Mineralization is reduced around the middle tract of primary laterals. Biometric data are shown in Table 1. Estimation of h from oblique sections is illustrated in the supplemental data.
Type locality and horizon only.
The calcareous sleeve is simple, not articulated, closed at the top. The shape is roughly cylindrical, ~1.9–3.5 times longer than wide. The lower part may be tapered (Fig. 8.1, 8.3–8.5) or not (Fig. 8.2, 8.8).
The inner surface is slightly undulose, seemingly close to the central stem, but not touching it. The inner widening and lateral contact of the primary laterals prevented mineralization from extending farther inward. The inner cavity is quite large, which is augmented because the initial parts of the primary laterals are not mineralized.
The outer surface is regular, sometimes faintly undulose between whorls. Calcification encrusts the outer part of primary laterals, from the end of the middle tract (Figs. 8.7, 9.1) to the widening distal part (Figs. 8.6, 9.2, 9.4). Calcification is deficient in the mid part of the fertile tract. As a result, in this part, adjacent pores of the same whorl are often not separated by a mineralized wall (Figs. 8.9, 9.3–9.5), thus forming an annular channel (Barattolo, 2019, fig. 7). Very occasionally a distinct thin wall can be observed (Figs. 8.10, 9.6). In the space between whorls, an oblique canal connects two pores of adjacent whorls, forming oblique channels (Fig. 9.7, 9.8). Remnants of mineralization persist in the spaces between whorls (Fig. 10.1, 10.4).
The primary laterals are set in close whorls (Figs. 8.1, 9.2), with 33–66 per whorl. The distance between whorls (h) is relatively low (0.19–0.49 mm) so that in the middle tract primary laterals appear vertically packed (e.g., Fig. 9.8). The arrangement is alternate in two subsequent whorls (Figs. 9.8, 10.4). In the lower part of the calcareous skeleton, primary laterals are orthogonal, or bent slightly upward, with respect to the vertical axis (Figs. 8.1–8.3, 9.2, 10.3). In the middle and upper parts, they are slightly inclined upward (75–80° to the axis), and inclination then decreases towards the top where they are arranged vertically (Figs. 8.1, 8.8, 10.6). The primary laterals are moderately long and phloiophorous. The primary lateral can be subdivided into three parts. The inner tract is subcylindrical, ~15–20% of total length. It opens widely inward (Figs. 8.9, 10.2, 10.5, 10.8); it is not clear whether this inner swelling is a primary character or is due to deficiency of calcification (countersinking, Barattolo, 2019). The regular shape of the pores and reduction in size of the middle part of the first tract suggest that this is a primary character (Fig. 10.2, 10.4). The middle tract is the largest, and fertile, forming ~65–70% of the total length. The enlargement is not symmetrical relative to the primary lateral axis, but develops in the upper side as a laterally compressed ellipsoidal bulge. Gametophores are confined to this tract, especially to the bulge. In the lower part of the thallus, primary laterals are shorter and the bulge more globular. Here, primary laterals exhibit an eight-shaped transverse cut (see section on “Deciphering voids and taxonomic implication”). The outer tract is similar in size to the inner tract, is flared out and creates a distal cortex (Figs. 8.2, 9.8, 10.2, 11.2, 11.4). It is aligned parallel to the primary lateral axis (Figs. 8.2, 9.4, 10.4). Sometimes, in the middle–upper parts of the thallus, this tract is strikingly shifted downward (Figs. 8.1, 10.2, 11.3). A few whorls of sterile primary laterals can occasionally be observed at the base of the calcareous skeleton (Figs. 8.2, 8.3, 9.2, 10.3, 11.5). These laterals are thinner and shorter than fertile ones, akrophorous for most of their length, and flaring outward.
Small, flattened, ellipsoidal (oblate spheroid) sparry calcite bodies occur inside the primary laterals, and often contain cyst cavities (Fig. 12.2, 12.6). These cystophores (Barattolo et al., 2013) can be considered a special type of gametophores. Cysts are arranged in the equatorial plane of the spheroid and number three to five, rarely six. No clear evidence has been found of seven cysts, although this cannot be excluded. The cystophores remain inside the middle tract of the primary laterals (Fig. 12.2, 12.6), noting that the equatorial planes are preferentially vertical. The cystophores rarely move peripherally into the space between the primary laterals (Fig. 12.5). In other cases, where the calcareous skeleton is reduced, isolated gametophores mark the boundary between two adjacent laterals (Fig. 12.1). The same is observed in Triploporella (Barattolo, 1982a, b; Barattolo et al., 2013). This arrangement may occur in the same specimen (e.g., upper region versus lower region, Figs. 11.1, 12.4).
Contiguous cystophores often become fused to each other, and to the calcareous skeleton, due to diagenetic conversion of the originally aragonitic skeleton (Fig. 12.3).
From Transylvania, the region that includes the Perşani Mountains.
Remarks on thallus reconstruction
The mineralized skeleton coats most parts of the fertile region of the thallus. The middle tract of the calcareous sleeve is often poorly calcified, thus producing an intermediate empty space (Barattolo, 2019). Consideration of the structures obliterated by the lack of mineralization have been discussed above (see section on “Deciphering voids and taxonomic implication”). All specimens can be referred to the apical fertile region of the thallus, and only a short length of the lower sterile part is preserved, making it difficult to estimate the total length of the thallus. Our reconstructions (Figs. 13, 14) assume that the primary laterals were prolonged inward, with a short uncalcified tract continuing the swollen inner part, and that the primary laterals likewise extended outward, forming a cortex.
Species assigned to Dragastanella n. gen. and comparison
The detection of species with one order or two orders of laterals is challenging when calcification does not extend beyond the primary laterals. In this situation, it is difficult to justify attribution of a species to Dragastanella n. gen. or Triploporella. For example, Triploporella carpatica Bucur, 1993 (Bucur et al., 2013) resembles Dragastanella transylvanica n. gen. n. sp., but mineralization stops before the distal end of the primary laterals (Fig. 15.1, 15.2, 15.9, 15.10). In comparison with Dragastanella transylvanica n. gen. n. sp., its cystophores are smaller, the fertile part of the primary laterals is entirely enveloped by a thin mineralized wall, and the sterile part is poorly and irregularly mineralized. Despite this, the mineralized skeleton of Triploporella carpatica does not allow convincing assignment to either Triploporella or Dragastanella n. gen. Nonetheless, this species is provisionally retained in the genus Triploporella. Conversely, species such as Zittelina hispanica Masse et al., 1993, Zittelina massei Bucur et al., 2010, and Triploporella matesina Barattolo, 1980, are here transferred to Dragastanella n. gen.
Comparing the species assigned to Dragastanella n. gen., it seems evident that most of the biometrical range intervals overlap considerably (Table 2). Thus, simple traditional size parameters, such as outer (D) and inner (d) diameters, are insufficient to clearly distinguish species. Conversely, the thallus, laterals, cystophores, and mineralization, taken together, allow confident distinction among species. The overall appearance of the alga depends on a combination of biometric characters, such as size of the primary laterals (p, l), number of laterals in a whorl (w), and height between whorls (h). In contrast, the arrangement of reproductive organs within primary laterals is regulated by parameters related to the capacity of the primary laterals, such as size of primary laterals (p), size of cystophores (la, da), and number of cystophores per lateral. In this regard, at least three types of primary arrangement of cystophores have been observed (Fig. 16.1–16.3). Cystophores can occupy the upper part of the primary laterals (superior type, Fig. 16.1, e.g., Dragastanella transylvanica n. gen. n. sp.), be more or less equally disseminated within the primary lateral (internal type, Fig. 16.2, e.g., Dragastanella matesina n. comb.), or be arranged close to the inner surface of the primary laterals (peripheral type, Fig. 16.3). Moreover, there is substantial evidence that, following decay of the alga, cystophores were released from the primary laterals. The secondary location of the cystophores can be inferred when, for example, cystophores are found half in and half out of the primary laterals that originally contained them or when, in the same specimen, they are totally inside laterals in one location, and outside in another. Two types of secondary location have been recorded (Fig. 16.4, 16.5). Cystophores can be totally or partly distributed between the whorls (interverticillar type, Fig. 16.4, e.g., Dragastanella massei n. comb.), or all around the laterals (marginal type, Fig. 16.5, e.g., Dragastanella hispanica n. comb.). The lack of cystophores, or the occurrence of one or two types of secondary location, seemingly depends on several factors, such as the presence, thickness, or lack of the calcified wall around primary laterals, and the accommodation space between laterals of the same whorl and between the whorls. Therefore, in the same species, by subtly varying these factors, it is possible to produce one or two types of placement, rarely three types.
Dragastanella hispanica (Masse, Arias, and Vilas, 1993) new combination
Longitudinal-oblique section from the Sierra de la Oliva, Caudete (Albacete Province, Spain), thin section 11695-9, Centre de sédimentologie-paléontologie, Université de Provence (Marseille, France), J. P. Masse collection. Illustrated in Masse et al. (1993, pl. I, fig. 1).
As described by Masse et al. (1993), primary laterals are only enveloped by calcification in their proximal and distal parts. In the middle part, primary laterals are not calcified. However, rarely, calcified walls are visible between laterals of the same whorl (Masse et al., 1993, pl. I, figs. 4, 5, central and middle-right parts, respectively). This suggests that the middle parts of primary laterals could have been relatively strong and laterally closely packed (Fig. 15.3, 15.4). Cystophores are secondarily shifted, producing a marginal arrangement (Fig. 15.4). Dragastanella hispanica n. comb. (Fig. 15.3, 15.4) differs from Dragastanella transylvanica n. gen. n. sp. by having a stronger and less elongate shape of the primary laterals, and by having peripheral to marginal cystophores. Most specimens (95%) of Dragastanella transylvanica n. gen. n. sp. (Fig. 15.1, 15.2) show a primary location of the cystophores (superior type), and only a few show a secondary location (interverticillar type, 4%, and marginal type, 1%).
Dragastanella massei (Bucur et al., 2010) new combination
Longitudinal-oblique section from Subpiatră Quarry, near Aleşd (Pădurea Craiului Massif, Northern Apuseni Mountains, Romania), thin section 10209(1), deposited in the Department of Geology, Babeş-Bolyai University, Ioan I. Bucur collection. Figured in Bucur et al. (2010, fig. 5b).
As in Dragastanella hispanica n. comb., this species has an inner calcified wall close to the axial stem and an outer sub-cortical calcified wall. The middle part of the primary laterals is not calcified; a thin wall is occasionally present between laterals of a whorl (Bucur et al., 2010, fig. 5e), and rarely in the space between whorls (Bucur et al., 2010, fig. 7i). The first tract of primary laterals displays an outward eight shape (8) in transverse section (Bucur et al., 2010, fig. 5e [middle part], fig. 8c [middle part], fig. 8 g [lower part]). Cystophores are secondarily shifted, producing interverticillar arrangement (Fig. 15.6). Dragastanella massei n. comb. (Fig. 15.5, 15.6) shows primary laterals with a distinctly widened inner end, thus forming a type of inner cortex; similar widening also occurs in Dragastanella transylvanica n. gen. n. sp. The central fertile parts of the primary laterals are deprived of mineralization, thereby forming an annular channel at whorl level. The position of reproductive organs always appears to be of interverticillar type.
Dragastanella matesina (Barattolo, 1980) new combination
Oblique section from Barremian–lower Aptian limestone, southern slopes of Mt. Miletto (Matese Massif, Southern Italy), thin section S.200.a.11, Piero De Castro collection housed in the University of Naples Federico II. Illustrated in Barattolo (1980, pl. VIII, fig. 2).
As described in Barattolo (1980, p. 137–138), primary laterals distally end with a single “pore,” interpreted as the uncalcified proximal part of a tuft of secondary laterals. Based on the evidence concerning Dragastanella transylvanica n. gen. n. sp., the single rounded “pore” of Triploporella matesina more reasonably should be referred to the distal part of the primary lateral; thus, this species is assigned to the genus Dragastanella n. gen. Cystophores are located in the primary laterals, showing an internal type of arrangement (Fig. 15.8). Dragastanella matesina n. comb. (Fig. 15.7, 15.8) is smaller than Dragastanella transylvanica n. gen. n. sp. and its cystophores are larger, fewer in number per primary lateral, and with a primary location (internal type).
We thank B. Kołodziej (Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland) for determination of the corals, and G. Pleş and C. Balica (Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania) for redrawing Figures 1 and 2. We thank R. Riding (University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA) for his very helpful review of the manuscript. A sincere thank you also goes to L. Carbone, Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Napoli Federico II, for his background check on the mathematical part (Supplemental Data). We also thank reviewers S. LoDuca (Associate Editor of JP), B. Granier (Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Département des Sciences de la Terre et de l'Univers, FR), and M.A. Conrad (Genève, CH) for their useful suggestions that improved the manuscript.
Data availability statement
Data available from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.51c59zw84.