Abstract

The use of sediment accretion rates measured on coastal and estuarine salt marshes as a surrogate for rates of sea-level change rests on the (usually implicit) assumption that marsh maturity is unchanged over the measurement period. This assumption is inherently difficult to test empirically, but a simple mathematical analysis shows that it is true only in a severely restricted case. Under most practical conditions, measured accretion rates either over-estimate or under-estimate the rate of sea-level change. Under certain circumstances, they may indicate an upward trend when the tendency is actually downward. A knowledge of marsh history is critical to the evaluation of such measurements. Sea-level movements estimated from accretion rates are theoretically most reliable in the case of relatively old marshes and comparatively short measurement periods.

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview
You do not currently have access to this article.