Abstract

The Caledonian mafic and ultramfic intrusions of the Grampian region of northeast Scotland are synorogenic tholeiitic plutons of middle Ordovician age. They include layered cumulates and xenolithic, contaminated and granular gabbroic varieties. The structurally complex Huntly–Knock intrusions contain locally significant quantities of Fe–Ni–Cu sulphide, while the associated country rock metasediments are sporadically enriched in Fe-sulphide.

Sulphur isotope analyses on sulphide from within and around the intrusions give the following ranges of δ34S; – 0.1 to —1.7‰ for disseminated to massive sulphides in the complex and deformed Littlemill-Auchencrieve contact zone; +0.7 to +4.3‰ for disseminated interstitial sulphides within cumulate and granular rocks; + 1.7 to +6.0‰ for graphitic and sulphidic pyroxenitic pegmatites; –6.0 to +16.5‰ for disseminated sulphide from country rock metasediments; –4.0 to +8.2‰ for sulphides in partially melted sediments.

δ34S of sulphides in the igneous rocks (χ̄ = +0.5 ± 2.4‰ (1σ), n = 36) lie within the range usually indicated for primary magmatic sulphur, i.e. 0 ±3‰, so that the sulphide system was probably dominated by magmatic sulphur. There is, however, a distinct difference between the isotopically heavier cumulate and granular rocks ( =±2.4 ± 1.2‰ (1σ) n = 9) and the lighter sulphide of the contact zone (χ̄ = –1.1 ± 0.4‰ (lσ), n = 21). The possibility that the slightly negative δ34S values of the contact zone are due to a contribution of 32S rich sulphur from sulphidic calcareous units is considered unlikely, due to the homogeneity of the contact zone δ34S values, and so the variation between the two groups is attributed to processes operative within the magma. Locally, an input from country rock sulphur has occurred as suggested by the δ34S values for xenolithic gabbro (+6.5‰), some of the graphitic and sulphidic pyroxenitic pegmatites (+5.9, +6.0‰) and possibly a basal olivine cumulate (+4.3‰). Although the data from the Littlemill-Auchencrieve contact zone are isotopically distinct from those Ni-Cu deposits dominated by crustal sulphur, petrographic evidence suggests that crustal involvement may have been important in the siting of the ore.

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview
You do not currently have access to this article.