Exploration for oil-bearing Morrow sandstones using conventional seismic data/methods has a startlingly low success rate of only 3%. The S-wave velocity contrast between the Morrow shale and A sandstone is strong compared with the P-wave velocity contrast, and, therefore, multicomponent seismic data could help to characterize these reservoirs. The SV and SH data used in this study are generated using S-wave data from horizontal source and horizontal receiver recording. Prestack P- and S-wave inversions, and joint P- and S-wave inversions, provide estimates of P- and S-wave impedances, and density for characterization of the Morrow A sandstone. Due to the weak P-wave amplitude-versus-angle response at the Morrow A sandstone top, the density and S-wave impedance estimated from joint P- and S-wave inversions were inferior to the prestack S-wave inversion. The inversion results were compared with the Morrow A sandstone thickness and density maps obtained from well logs to select the final impedance and density volume for interpretation. The P-wave impedance estimated from prestack P-wave data, as well as density and S-wave impedance estimated from prestack SV‐wave data were used to identify the distribution, thickness, quality, and porosity of the Morrow A sandstone. The stratal slicing method was used to get the P- and S-wave impedances and density maps. The S-wave impedance characterizes the Morrow A sandstone distribution better than the P-wave impedance throughout the study area. Density estimation from prestack inversion of SV data was able to distinguish between low- and high-quality reservoirs. The porosity volume was estimated from the density obtained from prestack SV-wave inversion. We found some possible well locations based on the interpretation.

You do not currently have access to this article.