40Ar/39Ar thermochronology in the Ios basement terrane resolves the tectonic significance of the South Cyclades Shear Zone
-
Published:January 02, 2020
- Standard View
- Open the PDF for in another window
-
CiteCitation
Marnie Forster, Oleg Koudashev, Ruoran Nie, Sonia Yeung, Gordon Lister, 2020. "40Ar/39Ar thermochronology in the Ios basement terrane resolves the tectonic significance of the South Cyclades Shear Zone", Folding and Fracturing of Rocks: 50 Years of Research since the Seminal Text Book of J. G. Ramsay, C. E. Bond, H. D. Lebit
Download citation file:
- Share
Abstract
We conducted 39Ar diffusion experiments using potassium feldspar from the South Cyclades Shear Zone on Ios, in the Cyclades, Aegean Sea, Greece. Irradiated samples were step-heated in an ultra-high-vacuum resistance furnace attached to a mass spectrometer, thus also allowing 40Ar/39Ar geochronology. Conjoint inversion of these datasets allowed estimation of the relevant diffusion parameters, which were then used to forward model the effect of arbitrary temperature–time histories. Simulations used Monte Carlo methods to improve approximations to the observed age spectra. Two periods of rapid cooling could be inferred. The South Cyclades Shear Zone commenced operation during or shortly after the Eocene–Oligocene transition. Episodes of south-directed movement continued into Early Miocene time, however, with the footwall still hot enough to cause biotite ± garnet metamorphic mineral growth at the base of the overlying, already substantially exhumed, eclogite–blueschist unit. Since its footwall continued to cool, the South Cyclades Shear Zone was an extensional shear zone during both episodes of its operation.
Supplementary material: A description of our analytical methods, analysis data, 40Ar/39Ar procedure information and forward modelling data plus other relevant data are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4447973
How to make the distinction between a thrust- versus an extensional-detachment-related structure is one of the most difficult topics in structural geology. In this paper we show we can achieve this result if we can: (i) determine how temperature varied with time in the footwall, and/or in the hanging wall; and then (ii) link this thermal evolution to the development of fabrics and microstructures in the rocks affected by these movements. Such data can uniquely constrain the tectonic significance of an individual low-angle fault or shear zone and thus allow choice between these competing hypotheses (Fig. 1).
One might consider that this distinction should be made using sense-of-shear indicators, but these usually do not help. Regionally developed shear zones are typically warped and folded. Stretching can impose shear bands with opposing shear-sense around crustal-scale necking structures, and these later-stage shear bands confuse the recognition of shear-sense associated with the dominant fabric. In consequence, while sense-of-shear and variation in the trend of stretching lineations remain important and significant variables, they do not allow us to determine whether: (i) a specific ductile shear zone was associated with stretching of the crust overall, and linked to the operation of areally extensive detachment faults; or (ii) the shear zone in question represents the deeper structural levels of a megathrust, with brittle thrust faults in its more surficial expression.
Low-temperature geothermometers are also of limited value in dealing with this question. (U–Th)/He or fission track analyses using apatite and/or zircon record time only in temperature regimes wherein the rock has long ceased to be ductile. Similar limitations apply to high-temperature geochronometers such as U–Pb methods that date the formation of accessory minerals in magmas or in high-temperature metamorphic rocks. In contrast 40Ar/39Ar geochronology is of more direct interest, because the method provides timing data that coincide with the range of temperatures during which most exposed crustal rocks develop fabric. A key aspect of our research has thus been to integrate the theory and methods of 40Ar/39Ar geochronology to allow the interrogation of fabrics and microstructures to reveal the history of orogenesis in the ductile regime.
The Cycladic Archipelago
The Cyclades, Aegean Sea, Greece (Fig. 2) is a good place to demonstrate our progress, for several papers now assert a thrust interpretation for structures there that have previously been argued to be extensional (e.g. Huet et al. 2009; Xypolias et al. 2012; Aravadinou et al. 2016). Of particular interest are competing models for the origin of the South Cyclades Shear Zone (or SCSZ) on Ios (Fig. 3). One hypothesis (Huet et al. 2009) considers the SCSZ as a thrust, formed beneath the eclogite–blueschist belt while buoyancy drove its extrusion from a ‘syn-orogenic’ subduction channel. The alternative hypothesis is that the SCSZ is the ductile carapace of a metamorphic core complex formed on the northern margin of the closing Tethys, starting in earliest Oligocene time (Forster & Lister 2009). The core-complex model suggests that the eclogite–blueschist belt was significantly exhumed before it was thrust over the Ios basement terrane prior to SCSZ activity (Vandenberg & Lister 1996). Operation of the SCSZ was associated with partial exhumation of the Ios basement in the footwall of an earlier-formed terrane stack, followed by brittle extensional detachment faults that accomplished further exhumation.
The Cycladic archipelago provides spectacular exposures of a dismembered eclogite–blueschist belt overlying metamorphic core complexes. There is much to be learned as to: (i) the nature of Alpine orogenesis; (ii) how high-pressure rocks are exhumed; and (iii) the interaction of deformation with fluid and metamorphic processes. This, with the quality of outcrop, the ease of access and the convivial environment, makes the Cyclades a popular choice for student mapping camps and research projects. However, the resultant maps or cross-sections differ widely (e.g. for Sifnos, compare Avigad 1993; Groppo et al. 2009; Ring et al. 2011; Aravadinou et al. 2016; Roche et al. 2016). These marked differences in style or interpretation point to a number of problems in respect to the elucidation of the geological architecture – issues that need to be addressed if we are to progress our understanding of this outstanding natural laboratory for the study of structural geology and tectonics.
Xypolias et al. (2012) review some of differences in interpretation, and we add to their list. The least contentious propositions are that: (i) the eclogite–blueschist belt formed in association with a long-lived north- to NE-facing subduction zone (Jolivet et al. 2003; Jolivet & Brun 2010; Ring et al. 2010); (ii) south- to SE-directed rollback of the hinge of the subducting slab caused lithospheric extension and exhumation of metamorphic rocks (Lister et al. 1984; Jolivet & Faccenna 2000; Brun & Faccenna 2008; Husson et al. 2009); and (iii) the rocks involved were subject to continual tectonism during the Alpine orogeny, whether this was ‘continuous’ (e.g. Cliff et al. 2017) or episodic as the result of a succession of accretion events (Lister & Forster 2009; Edwards & Grasemann 2009). There are also controversial questions such as: (i) whether the eclogite–blueschist belt exhumed as an entity (Jolivet et al. 2003) or as a succession of individual tectonic slices each with a distinct tectonothermal history (Forster & Lister 2005, 2009); or (ii) whether there were several generations of subhorizontal extensional shear zones and detachment faults. Other issues are described below.
When did high-angle normal faults form?
The topography of the Cyclades is dissected by intersecting arrays of high-angle normal faults (Mascle & Martin 1990), each array with distinct trends. Brun et al. (2016) suggests a change in tectonic style in the Pliocene, moving from distributed extension to the formation of high-angle normal faults defining tilt-block arrays. However, on Sifnos we have also mapped earlier formed tilt-block arrays that are truncated at their base by a low-angle detachment (see cross-section in Groppo et al. 2009). Hence the transition noted by Brun et al. (2016) might reflect the start of a new extension cycle, in the manner as described by Lister & Davis (1989) for the Cordilleran core complexes. In any case, the largely unspecified vertical throws on these high-angle faults make it difficult to correlate earlier-formed subhorizontal structures, confounding interpretations (in maps or cross-sections) that attempt to extrapolate individual low-angle structures from island to island (Fig. 2).
An episodic v. a continuous tectonic evolution?
There are differences in opinion as to the metamorphic evolution of these rocks, as set out by Huet et al. (2009, 2015). Issues that need to be resolved include whether: (i) the pressure–temperature–time (P–T–t) path followed by individual rocks was a relatively simple loop (e.g. Jolivet & Brun 2010), or convoluted, reflecting the effect of movements that produced the observed fabrics and microstructures (Forster & Lister 2005; Lister & Forster 2016); or whether (ii) the metamorphic evolution was a simple (M1–M2) retrogression to greenschist facies caused by percolation of fluids into eclogite–blueschist rocks (e.g. Schliestedt & Matthews 1987), or a well-defined sequence of metamorphic mineral growth episodes closely linked to the initiation and operation of crustal-scale extensional shear zones (e.g. Forster & Lister 2005; Lister & Forster 2009, 2016).
The exhumation of the high-pressure rocks was substantially complete before the onset of Oligo-Miocene extension (Avigad et al. 1997; Schmädicke & Will 2003; Chatzaras et al. 2006; Kokkalas et al. 2006). However, we argue that the Ios basement terrane was accreted in Late Eocene time when it underthrust the already substantially exhumed eclogite–blueschist belt. Eventually the basement terrane was sliced free from the subducting African slab and added to the terrane stack overlying the active subduction-zone megathrust. According to the tectonic mode switch model (Rawling & Lister 1999; Lister et al. 2001, figs. 6–9; Forster & Lister 2005, fig. 12; Forster & Lister 2009, fig. 11; Lister & Forster 2009, figs. 9 & 10), shortening occurs when buoyant (later-to-be-accreted) terranes arrive at a subduction interface. Stress buildup leads to thrusting, with each thrust slicing into the newly arrived terrane and excising individual tectonic slices. These slices are added in turn to the over-riding terrane stack (Lister & Forster 2009, fig. 11), thus defining its tectono-metamorphic stratigraphy. Subsequent horizontal stretching of the terrane stack is made possible because accretion frees the subducting slab from the hindrance of the (now-accreted) buoyant material that caused the tectonic mode switch in the first place. For this reason, we do not divide the history into a syntectonic- v. a post-tectonic phase. As noted by Edwards & Grasemann (2009), convergence and consequent tectonism continue, even today.
Tectonic sequence diagrams
We applied classic methodologies (e.g. Ramsay & Huber 1987), but we have also considered new developments in structural geology (e.g. Hobbs 2019) such as the method of tectonic sequence diagrams, or TSDs (Forster & Lister 2008). In Forster & Lister (2005) and Lister & Forster (2009, 2016) we document a succession of Eocene to Oligocene metamorphic episodes: (i) eclogite facies growth of omphacite and jadeite, Δ1B at c. 53 Ma, with post-Δ1B stretching; (ii) a succession of Δ1C porphyroblastic growth events in the glaucophane + garnet blueschist facies, from c. 46–42 Ma, followed by exhumation in post-Δ1C shear zones that are later recumbently folded; and (iii) transitional epidote–albite blueschist facies (Evans 1990) with metamorphic mineral growth events, Δ1D at c. 35–34 Ma, followed by exhumation in post-Δ1D shear zones that are also later recumbently folded. This sequence of metamorphic mineral growth events (Fig. 4) is regionally consistent, with each growth episode linked to the subsequent formation of ductile shear zones and/or pure shear ductile stretching of the rock mass, e.g. Cliff et al. (2017). The use of TSDs is thus critical in allowing 40Ar/39Ar geochronology to be tied to the evolution of fabric and microstructure.
TSDs allow ready incorporation of the detail of event sequences discernable under the optical microscope, allowing the metamorphic evolution to be tied to the sequence of fabric-forming events and microstructural processes. When dates are linked to TSDs, microstructurally focused geochronology (e.g. Cliff et al. 2017) becomes a valuable tool for structural analysis. In this way we were able to demonstrate that the Cycladic metamorphic core complexes formed as the result of extreme stretching of the lithosphere during two separate events. The first of these stretching events occurred in Eocene–Oligocene time (Forster & Lister 2009) when the Ios core complex formed beneath a post-Δ1D Early Oligocene shear zone. The core complex was later transected by Miocene north-sense ductile shear zones formed in association with the extreme extension that produced the North Cycladic core complexes, on Naxos and Paros (Urai et al. 1990; Buick 1991; Lee & Lister 1992; Gautier et al. 1993; Gautier & Brun 1994; Jolivet et al. 2013). Equivalent Early Oligocene extensional shear zones have now been recognized, e.g. on Serifos (Schneider et al. 2011), Syros (Lister & Forster 2016) and Sifnos. Huet et al. (2015) record ages on Andros that are consistent with the late stages of such Early Oligocene shear zones. These data imply a considerable lateral extent for such structures (Fig. 2), potentially connecting the SCSZ into an Oligocene equivalent of the Miocene West Cycladic detachment fault system (Grasemann et al. 2012).
The Ios metamorphic core complex
Ios (Fig. 3) was the first recognized of the Aegean metamorphic core complexes (Lister et al. 1984). Its discovery set the scene for the discovery of similar metamorphic core complexes scattered along the northern extants of Alpine Tethys (e.g. Jolivet et al. 1999; Verdel et al. 2007), including dozens of schists and gneiss domes in the northern reaches of the Himalaya, Karakorum and Tibet (e.g. Lee et al. 2004; Guo et al. 2008; Forster et al. 2011).
Tethyan core complexes
Significant differences distinguish Tethyan core complexes from their cousins in the North American Cordillera (G.H. Davis 1983; G.A. Davis et al. 1986; G.H. Davis et al. 1987; Lister & Davis 1989; Reynolds & Lister 1990). These differences can be summarized as: (i) a multiplicity of overprinting detachment faults and shear zones, including complicated interactions with high-angle normal faults; (ii) complex kinematics during the exhumation history; (iii) an absence of major breccia zones; and (iv) surficial deposits only in the very last stages of exhumation. These differences do not change one fundamental aspect of core complex formation and exhumation, however. These entities are typically caused by extension in the lithosphere over-riding a retreating subduction zone. In the case of the North American Cordillera, the Farallon Slab was collapsing into the mantle, with the zone of extending lithosphere far inland. In the case of the Aegean core complexes, the African slab was foundering. The essential difference was that Gondwanan basement terranes such as the Ios basement gneisses were progressively accreted to the Aegean terrane stack. The subduction zone megathrust became ever more distal in relation to the tectono-metamorphic evolution of individual slices in the terrane stack as time went on (Lister & Forster 2009).
In all metamorphic core complexes, detachment faults are brittle structures that transect earlier-formed shear zones. The ductile shear zones appear to accommodate the bulk of the movement, although the approximate spatial coincidence of later-formed detachment faults with earlier-formed ductile shear zones implies that the detachment faults feed into equivalent ductile shear zones at depth (Lister & Davis 1989). In consequence, the evolution of these extensional systems must be viewed as both progressive and episodic (cf. Brun et al. 2016). Ios is a typical Tethyan core complex in that complex kinematics were experienced during its long exhumation history (Vandenberg & Lister 1996; Forster & Lister 1999a, b; Huet et al. 2009). The south-sense shear zones were transected by north-sense shear zones, and by a multiplicity of low-angle brittle detachment faults that dissect the system and overprint earlier formed structures (Forster & Lister 1999a, 2009), e.g. the late-formed André Fault that transects the south-directed listric normal faults (Figs 5c & 6) that juxtapose the Cycladic eclogite–blueschist belt against the metamorphic basement.
South-dipping high-angle normal faults also dissect Ios, and other islands in the Cycladic archipelago, but these have rarely been included in published cross-sections. High-angle normal faults explain the locally steep SCSZ fabrics in the northernmost exposures of the Ios basement, since back-rotation (Fig. 6) leads to steepening of north-dipping fabrics. In contrast, because fabrics in the south of the Ios dome originally dipped more steeply to the south, back-rotation led fabrics in the south to become more gently inclined. Earlier-formed south-vergent listric normal faults also led to the local steepening of fabrics in the north, with fabrics near the Ios Detachment rotated past the vertical (Fig. 5c).
The South Cyclades Shear Zone
The carapace of the Ios schist and gneiss dome is defined by the SCSZ. The SCSZ was later cut by brittle detachment faults formed with the same south-directed sense of movement (Fig. 5a–c, locations 1 and 2). The core complex was also dissected by later, Oligo-Miocene, north-directed extensional ductile shear zones and associated brittle detachment faults, e.g. the north-directed André Fault, mapped by Forster & Lister (1999a), and a major north-directed greenschist facies shear zone in the very north of the island.
Huet et al. (2009) argued that the SCSZ cumulated strain during a long period of south-directed thrusting associated with extrusion of the Cycladic eclogite–blueschist belt, after its initial subduction. However, earlier-formed fabrics and microstructures in the eclogite–blueschist belt formed before SCSZ operation, as attested to by intervening periods of folding. Our mapping shows earlier-formed glaucophane lineations re-oriented in post-Δ1D shear zones.
Forster & Lister (2009) show that the SCSZ formed during the Eocene–Oligocene stretching event, subsequent to earlier episodes of high-pressure metamorphism. It was re-activated with the same south-sense in the Oligo-Miocene stretching event and overprinted by north-sense shear zones. The fabrics in the SCSZ immediately below the Ios detachment are the most intense where the top of the SCSZ is exposed on scarps of the Port Beach high-angle normal fault system (Fig. 5b). The outcrop of the SCSZ on these scarps displays south-sense shear bands, including in the immediate vicinity of the Ios detachment. On the western flank of the Ios dome (e.g. locations 3, 4 and 5), coarse augengneiss also crops out, with the south-directed shear sense spectacularly recorded by large K-feldspar porphyroclasts (Fig. 5d). Intense north-directed shear zones (Fig. 5e) dissect the schist–gneiss contact, and these destroy the large K-feldspar porphyroclasts.
Two samples (both collected in 2001) were chosen at location 5, both described in Forster & Lister (2009). In this paper we invert these data to obtain an estimate of the variation of temperature with time during the geological history to which each sample was subjected. Sample AG01-02 (or AG02-01 in Forster & Lister 2009) is from a deformed Hercynian granitoid in the Ios basement, about 100 m below the projected location of the Ios Detachment (location 5 on Fig. 3), within the SCSZ. It is dominated by south-sense shear bands. The results of its analysis are shown in Figures 7,, 8,, 9, with details in the Supplementary Information. The second sample (AG01-01) is from a narrow (centimetre-scale) north-sense shear zone that overprints the SCSZ in a location immediately adjacent to AG01-02 (Forster & Lister 2009). The results of its analysis are shown in Figures 10,, 11,, 12,, 13, again with details given in the Supplementary Information. K-feldspar has grown in pressure shadows around older porphyroclasts which are progressively destroyed (Fig. 5d). The north-sense shear zones destroy the relict K-feldspar porphyroclasts (Fig. 5e), so AG01-01 yields a similar lower limit of 16.4 ± 0.1 Ma, but the relict c. 33.5 Ma population has disappeared. This limits the thermal history information that can be obtained from this sample. Since the c. 33.5 Ma steps in AG01-02 (Fig. 7) were not present in the north-sense shear zone sampled in AG01-01 (Fig. 10), Forster & Lister (2009) concluded that the SCSZ had commenced operation some time in the period 35–34 Ma.
Quantitative 40Ar/39Ar thermochronology
Here we report results using a newly developed technique called conjoint inversion to extract information from the Arrhenius plot, the comparative radius plot and the measured age spectrum, using these two samples from the SCSZ. Quantitative thermochronology requires specification of the diffusion parameters, thus enabling numerical models that can simulate the effect of temperature with time.
UHV diffusion experiments using 39Ar
Based on the assumption of an initial geometry, data from ultra-high-vacuum (UHV) diffusion experiments using 39Ar can be converted into D/r2 measurements, where D is diffusivity and r the radius of the diffusion domain. Plotted against the inverse of absolute temperature, the resulting Arrhenius data (Figs 7 & 10) can be inverted to obtain estimates of the diffusion parameters, enabling further inversion to produce temperature histories capable of simulating the observed age spectra. UHV diffusion experiments require temperature to be calibrated accurately, using the melting point of several different metals. Each step-heating experiment produces one 40Ar/39Ar age measurement, corrected for interference from Ca and Cl contaminants, and in retrospect (after back-calculation) the percentage release of the 39Ar isotope. The ramping up and ramping down of temperature during each measurement need also to be abrupt, so that the equations used to calculate percentage loss produce reasonable approximations. Step-heating schedules need to be designed to uniformly populate the Arrhenius plot, as discussed in Lister & Forster (2016).
Conjoint inversion of Arrhenius data and age spectra
It is difficult to estimate the diffusion parameters from a complex Arrhenius plot. We suggest that there are ‘core domains’ that are highly retentive, with ‘rim domains’ that are far less retentive. The fundamental asymmetry principle (Forster & Lister 2010) allows estimation of their diffusion properties (Figs 7c & 10c), but this method requires the volume ratio to be independently estimated using the r/r0 plot (Fig. 8). This is not an accurate method, however, as gas release from an individual domain does not occur in isolation. Therefore the eArgon program was modified to include the Wunderkind inversion routines. These use a Monte Carlo process seeded from estimates of the diffusion parameters. Individual threads computationally climb from a specific seed towards a best fit, determined conjointly by comparison with the Arrhenius plot and the r/r0 plot. The methods of conjoint inversion require a decision tree, in this case: (i) weighting to avoid breach of the Fundamental Asymmetry Principle; and (ii) perturbation of the diffusion parameters to improve the least-squares fit on either or both the Arrhenius plot and the r/r0 plot, with no reversion allowed.
The method can be described by analogy. The Wunderkind inversion routines drop individual ‘climbers’ (or seeds) at different locations in a mountainous landscape, with no prior knowledge of its topographic variation. Each climber begins to climb, and after a while, we compare how high different individuals have gone in order to decide which seeds have produced the most favourable outcome in terms of the goodness of fit. The routines vary activation energy, normalized frequency factor and relative volume, as well as the geometry parameters needed to describe a fractal. The most difficult variable is the number of fractal iterations allowed in order to describe the 3D ‘roughness’ of an individual diffusion domain. Because this number is discrete, we need to include judgements as to the morphology of an age spectrum that a particular fractal is capable of reproducing. When the number of fractal iterations is low (e.g. Fig. 11a), the spectrum jumps between sequences of smoothly progressing age steps. Increasing the number of fractal iterations continues to allow a good fit to the Arrhenius data and to the r/r0 plots (Fig. 12), but now with a smoother variation of age steps (Fig. 13). Hence, the choice of fractal parameters must be refined, by iteration, with the morphology of the simulated spectrum used as an independent parameter.
Using the diffusion parameters thereby inferred, the MacArgon program then allows forward modelling of the effect of different temperature histories. Selected steps in the reference spectrum are used as control points, with Monte Carlo methods minimizing the sum of least square deviations between measured and simulated spectra. The results (Figs 9 & 13) show two periods of rapid cooling, one around c. 34 Ma and the other commencing around c. 18 Ma. Sample AG01-01 has suffered considerable microstructural modification after the c. 34 Ma event, so its memory of that event is lacking. Similarly, sample AG01-02 suffered significant microstructural modification during the c. 34 Ma event, and these effects also need be taken into account. The thermal excursion above 550°C (Fig. 9) may be an artefact, for example. New growth of retentive K-feldspar at c. 35 Ma would allow a temperature history without the need for a thermal spike to reset the ‘argon clock’ in these domains at that time.
Discussion
Argon enters the retentive zone
During the time that the SCSZ has been studied, a progression has taken place in our understanding of mineral retentivity in respect to argon diffusion. This began when Baldwin & Lister (1998) focused on the tectonic significance of a thermal event on Ios they assumed to have taken place at c. 14 Ma. They recognized that the remarkable heterogeneity in the distribution of 40Ar/39Ar age in the Ios basement implied that these were not ‘cooling ages’ so the concept of ‘closure temperature’ had limited relevance to these rocks. Deformation and metamorphism had taken place in the Argon Partial Retention Zone. This work set the stage for the gradual recognition that 40Ar/39Ar age variation correlated with the relative age of the different microstructures (Forster & Lister 2005), a factor made even more evident by the application of the method of asymptotes and limits to the interpretation of 40Ar/39Ar age spectra (Forster & Lister 2004).
Building on the methods of analysis pioneered by Lovera et al. (1997, 2002), the eArgon computer code was then written to approximate the effect of fractal geometries on diffusion domains, and to allow the inversion of Arrhenius data. Thereby it was ascertained that minerals such as potassium feldspar (Forster & Lister 2010; Forster et al. 2015) or phengitic white mica (Forster & Lister 2013) may be far more retentive of argon than was considered to be the case. This means considerably higher closure temperatures, and that 40Ar/39Ar geochronology in consequence could be able to far better span the temperature regime relevant to structural geology. In many circumstances 40Ar/39Ar geochronology could be used for direct dating of the timing of microstructural events. This means that it would be less useful as a low-temperature thermochronometer, however.
Baldwin & Lister (1998) reported 40Ar/39Ar geochronology that provided the first hint that the SCSZ fabrics were remnant from an Eocene–Oligocene shear zone that had operated until at least c. 31–32 Ma. Similarly, the modelling results in this paper support the conclusion, based on microstructure, that the SCSZ had commenced its operation by c. 34 Ma (Forster & Lister 2009), and that its operation continued until c. 16 Ma. The overprinting of blueschist assemblages at the base of the upper plate by biotite ± garnet (Fig. 14) Δ2 Barrovian assemblages formed during south-directed ductile shear further supports the suggestion that south-sense SCSZ operation continued in the Miocene (Fig. 4).
The thermal response to detachment faulting
Figure 15 shows the evolution of temperature above and below an extensional detachment, based on formulae in Voorhoeve & Houseman (1988). The first calculations (Fig. 15a, b) assume instantaneous displacement on a detachment fault: (i) with relative displacement of 30 km on a fault dipping at 22.5° in a 25°C/km geotherm; and (ii) 16 km on a fault dipping at 30° in a 30°C geotherm. These diagrams show the rapidity with which thermal relaxation results in heating of the upper plate, and in cooling of the lower plate. Rocks close to the detachment (or in the ductile shear zone) almost immediately adjust to the temperature averaged between upper plate and lower plate during movement. The speed of conductive thermal relaxation is such that adjustments to the geotherm are substantially complete within 0.1 Ma, at least for rocks within 2 km of the interface.
The remaining diagrams show the temperature history: (i) 100 m below the detachment (Fig. 15c, d); and (ii) 100 m above the detachment (Fig. 15e, f). The geometry of detachment ensures that the upper plate heats pervasively above a detachment system, even though cooling of the lower plate takes place at the same time. The interface adjusts rapidly to the average temperature, so that measurements within 100 m of the contact are not reliable estimators of the magnitude of relative displacement across an individual detachment system (cf Reiners & Brandon 2006). After movement ceases, the upper plate cools only slowly, because the length scale then includes the lower plate. Rapid cooling ensues only when the upper plate finds itself in the lower plate of a later-formed detachment system.
Thomson et al. (2009) inferred timing of the Ios detachment based on lack of age variation from the upper plate to the lower plate. The modelling (above) shows this to be a misconception.
Microstructures at the base of the upper plate
Microstructures also potentially allow determination of the tectonic significance of a major ductile shear zone. Rocks above a major thrust will be hotter than those below, but they will cool rapidly during shear zone evolution. Conversely, rocks below a major detachment will be hotter than those above, but they will cool rapidly during shear zone evolution (Fig. 15c, d). Hence, using the terminology of tectonic sequence diagrams (Forster & Lister 2008), microstructures below a detachment will reflect ΔSZ sequences (Lister & Forster 2009) where Δ is an episode of mineral growth, and SZ is an overprinting shear band. In contrast rocks above a major detachment will be cooler than those below, so they will heat rapidly during shear zone evolution. Temperature remains high, even when detachment faulting has ceased, so SZΔ sequences are found, e.g. growth of small euhedral garnets that statically overprint late-formed shear bands. Microstructures forming in the upper plate during ongoing detachment may also reflect ΔSZ sequences, and form because the locus of relative movement shifts. Indicator minerals will nevertheless indicate steadily rising temperature. Late-stage shear bands are observed that begin with chlorite growth followed by growth of biotite in the shear plane (Fig. 14).
Rocks in the lower plate develop S-C mylonite fabrics, whereas rocks in the upper plate tend to stew, with mineral growth and veining driven by hot fluids moving upwards. Because temperatures rapidly average across the detachment–fault interface, mineral parageneses that reflect these fluid emanations also record the conditions at the base of the detachment. In the Plakato region, Δ1D assemblages have formed in cross-cutting veins at the base of the upper plate. The Δ1D episode of high-pressure metamorphic mineral growth took place under transitional blueschist–greenschist facies (Evans 1990) and was recorded as a separate event by Forster & Lister (1999b). The Eocene Oligocene timing of Δ1D was inferred by Forster & Lister (2005), matching the timing of the start of SCSZ operation as inferred by Forster & Lister (2009). However, the earlier Δ1C blueschist facies assemblages at the base of the upper plate are also overprinted by biotite-stable shear bands (Fig. 14), during south-directed shear in the SCSZ. This requires either continual operation of the SCSZ into the Miocene or a separate pulse of activity on the SCSZ at the start of the Miocene (Fig. 4).
Figure 14 also illustrates the difficulty of reaching biotite-stable conditions (exceeding 400°C) or garnet + biotite (c. 450°C) at the base of the upper plate. The lower plate needs to have been at temperatures exceeding c. 500–550°C to allow conductive relaxation in consequence of juxtaposition to heat the base of the upper plate to 400–420°C. The observed overprint by biotite-bearing assemblages thus requires the upper plate to have been at a depth of no more than 8–10 km, at temperatures of c. 250–300°C by this time, which means that the upper plate must have been significantly exhumed in order to allow it to be cool in comparison with the lower plate at the time of SCSZ operation. Otherwise the development of biotite-bearing assemblages would have been more pervasive throughout the upper plate, instead of being found only within a few metres of its base. These observations further support the contention that the SCSZ operated as an extensional detachment.
Phengite v. muscovite diffusion parameters
Uunk et al. (2018) used muscovite parameters as determined by Harrison et al. (2009) to model results for their phengite geochronology on Syros. The effect of different P–T–t paths was modelled using activation volume to correct for the effects of pressure. Uunk et al. (2018) require cooling below greenschist facies temperatures before closure occurs. This result can be extrapolated to the eclogite–blueschist unit on Ios, in which case exhumation-related cooling would need to have occurred at least 8–10 myr earlier than the onset of the operation of the SCSZ. In this case, the rocks over-riding the SCSZ would have been colder than the rocks beneath, i.e. requiring the SCSZ to be an extensional shear zone.
There is a problem with this conclusion, however. If phengite is as retentive of argon as data recorded by Forster & Lister (2013) seem to imply, phengite would have grown below its nominal closure temperature range, and thermochronological inferences would not be possible. Argon geochronology would allow direct dating of the time of recrystallization and grain growth. Forster & Lister (2013) show that muscovite sub-spectra can be obtained from finely interlayered phengite-muscovite mixtures, but only if the step-heating schedule is designed so as to uniformly populate the Arrhenius plot, and to ensure similar gas release percentages in as many steps as possible in the derivative age spectrum. The muscovite sub-spectrum is not easily recognized if the Arrhenius plot is sparsely or irregularly populated.
The role of excess argon
There is evidence for extraneous 40Ar accumulation in and adjacent to the Ios basement terrane (Laurent et al. 2017). This is 40Ar in excess of the amount in the sample owing to atmospheric contamination, as determined by the 36Ar/40Ar ratio on the York plot, and the radiogenic 40Ar* held in the lattice, produced by radioactive decay. While ‘excess argon’ can readily be determined in fluid inclusions, it is more difficult to separate during a UHV experiment. Excess argon can be recognized in the early cleaning steps, when isothermal duplicates are used in the step-heating schedule (Figs 7 & 10). It has not been recognized in the retentive domains of the potassium feldspar analysed in this paper. In respect to the excess 40Ar released during the early stages of an individual UHV experiment, it is evident that it does not sit in the lattice, since the release of the artificially produced 39Ar is not congruent with the 40Ar percentage release.
Comparison with Rb–Sr thermochronology
Thomson et al. (2009) conducted detailed thermochronology on Ios, with differing conclusions from those reached by Baldwin & Lister (1998) or Forster & Lister (2009). The main points of contention have to do with the interpretation of the significance of the results obtained using individual geochronometers. We agree that Rb–Sr methods can be used to ‘date the waning stages of mylonitic deformation’ (cf Thomson et al. 2009) but we challenge the relevance of their conclusion that the Rb–Sr system in ‘white mica is thermally stable to temperatures of c. 550°C’. The mineral has a propensity to recrystallize, dependent on the nature of the grain boundary fluid and/or the effects of plastic deformation of the mineral or the adjacent matrix. Paradoxical effects also result owing to advective fluid transport in mylonites, as noted by Müller et al. (1999) or Eberlei et al. (2015).
The Rb–Sr system is complex because the two processes involved (diffusive mass transfer through individual grains and advective mass transport through the grain boundary network) behave as a simple two-state Markov chain, e.g. http://setosa.io/ev/markov-chains/. Further, the two processes that govern the outcome take place on different scales, with differing kinetics. The effect of advection is greater when aqueous fluids are involved, because the ionic species involved are considerably more soluble.
Carbonate mylonites minimize the effect of H2O so the effects of advection are minimized, and the age obtained using Rb–Sr geochronology is usually the same as that obtained using 40Ar/39Ar geochronology on phengite. This is the case for the post-Δ1D shear zone that creates and then reorients a blue-amphibole lineation in the carapace of the Varvara boudin where Thomson et al. (2009) report a 34.5 ± 2.5 Ma age using Rb–Sr methods, thereby obtaining the same estimate as was obtained using 40Ar/39Ar geochronology (Forster & Lister 2009). Another example in which Rb–Sr geochronology gives the same estimates as obtained using 40Ar/39Ar geochronology comes from Syros (Cliff et al. 2017). Lister & Forster (2016) showed that several distinct microstructural growth episodes can be recognized in these rocks: (i) phengite growth at c. 53 Ma associated with the Δ1B eclogite facies event; (ii) decussate recrystallization leading to intergrowth of phengite at c. 46 Ma associated with the Δ1C glaucophane + garnet facies event sequence; followed by (iii) porphyroblastic growth of white mica at c. 42 Ma, also associated with the Δ1C glaucophane + garnet facies event sequence. Although Cliff et al. (2017) did not use TSDs, their microstructures are similar to what we observe, and there is a remarkable coincidence of ages obtained using Rb–Sr methods with those recorded by microstructurally focussed 40Ar/39Ar geochronology using the method of asymptotes and limits, e.g. in the Gria Spilia.
In contrast, when H2O dominates the pore fluid, younger ages are obtained, e.g. Thomson et al. (2009) report c. 18–19 Ma ages in north-sense shear zones that overprint the dominantly south-sense SCSZ. Müller et al. (1999) used Rb–Sr methods on white mica and co-existing phases in mylonites deformed at temperatures as low as 350°C and obtained consistent results. In contrast 40Ar/39Ar geochronology using phengite showed much older Variscan ages, with the characteristic ‘camel-hump’ age spectra that result from step-heating finely intergrown phengite–muscovite mixtures (Forster & Lister 2013). The age obtained for the muscovite component is a maximum age, broadly consistent with the result for Rb–Sr geochronology reported by Müller et al. (1999).
We suggest these data reflect the efficacy of ionic transport in H2O that advected through the mylonites, with transfer of material driven by changes in the pattern of grain-scale microdilatancy. In the case of mylonitic rocks with variable grain size, the effects of recrystallization of individuals grains has also to be taken into account. Heterogeneity in the inferred age distribution can reflect the presence of relict cores in individual grains, just as well as homogeneity in the inferred age distribution can reflect the absence of such relicts. Hence it is difficult to interpret the results of Rb–Sr geochronology without considering the effects of the last deformation in opening the system to advective mass transport, i.e. allowing a flux of material to move along grain boundaries and thereby re-establishing local equilibria.
Interestingly, the age obtained using Rb–Sr methods is similar to estimates of the timing of overprinting north-sense ductile shear zones on the basis of 40Ar/39Ar geochronology. The switch to north-directed extension might therefore have been abrupt, in Early Miocene time, throwing light on the debate as to the relation of the Ios core complex with its cousins on Naxos and Paros (Jolivet et al. 2004a, b) or with those in the west (Grasemann et al. 2012).
Conclusion
Modelling based on UHV diffusion experiments using potassium feldspar provided data that allowed conjoint inversion of the apparent age spectra provided by simultaneous 40Ar/39Ar geochronology. We demonstrated two periods of rapid cooling in the lower plate, and we have shown that rapid cooling took place in the lower plate during these two periods when the SCSZ was active. Hence the SCSZ was extensional, in both episodes of its operation. There is no evidence that it ever acted as a thrust.
The thermal structure during the Eocene–Oligocene transition involves hot-rocks being extracted from beneath colder rocks, attested to by the static growth of Δ1D transitional blueschist–greenschist assemblages in veins emanating from the basal detachment, and in disseminated pockets, showing that the eclogite–blueschist unit had ‘stewed’ in fluids under those conditions of pressure and temperature. In addition, during later south-sense SCSZ operation, in Oligo-Miocene time, biotite ± garnet grew in shear bands at the base of the eclogite–blueschist unit. Metamorphic microstructures thus show the bottom of the upper plate was heated during these periods of movement, as expected if the shear zone acted as an extensional detachment, juxtaposing a hot lower plate against a cooler upper plate. The results documented in this paper thus continue to support the hypothesis that the basement schists and gneisses of central Ios were exhumed beneath the SCSZ, with relicts of the tectonic sheets of the eclogite–blueschist unit stranded above.
Acknowledgements
Support from an Australian Research Council Discovery Project, DP120101875. Technical assistance provided by Davood Vasegh in the Argon Lab. The paper was improved by comments from Clare Bond, Jan Wijbrans and an anonymous reviewer.