Cretaceous characiform fishes (Teleostei: Ostariophysi) from Northern Tethys: Description of new material from the Maastrichtian of Provence (Southern France) and palaeobiogeographical implications
Published:January 01, 2008
O. Otero, X. Valentin, G. Garcia, 2008. "Cretaceous characiform fishes (Teleostei: Ostariophysi) from Northern Tethys: Description of new material from the Maastrichtian of Provence (Southern France) and palaeobiogeographical implications", Fishes and the Break-up of Pangaea, L. Cavin, A. Longbottom, M. Richter
Download citation file:
The order Characiformes (Teleostei: Otophysi) is one of the most diverse freshwater fish groups. It contains around 1400 living species in South and Central America and Africa. Their fossil record starts in the Cretaceous on both continents and also in Europe. Here, we describe and discuss the occurrences of new characiform fish teeth from Provence (Maastrichtian, S. France). Five morphological types are recognized. They belong to possibly three different taxa, and they are regarded as Characiformes indet. However, two of them have resemblances to alestin fishes and could be related to the African family Alestidae. The characiform fishes from...
Figures & Tables
Fishes and the Break-up of Pangaea
This volume, in honour of Peter L. Forey, is about fishes as palaeobiogeographic indicators in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic. The last 250 million years in the history of Earth have witnessed the break-up of Pangaea, affecting the biogeography of organisms. Fishes occupy almost all freshwater and marine environments, making them a good tool to assess palaeogeographic models.
The volume begins with studies of Triassic chondrichthyans and lungfishes, with reflections on Triassic palaeogeography. Phylogeny and distribution of Late Jurassic neoselachians and basal teleosts are broached, and are followed by five papers about the Cretaceous, dealing with SE Asian sharks, South American ray-finned fishes and coelacanths, European characiforms, and global fish palaeogeography. Then six papers cover Tertiary subjects, such as bony tongues, eels, cypriniforms and coelacanths.
There is generally a good fit between fish phylogenies and the evolution of the palaeogeographical pattern, although a few discrepancies question details of current palaeogeographic models and/or some aspects of fish phylogeny.