Serpentinization and magmatism during extension at non-volcanic margins: the effect of initial lithospheric structure
Published:January 01, 2001
M. Pérez-Gussinyé, T. J. Reston, J. Phipps Morgan, 2001. "Serpentinization and magmatism during extension at non-volcanic margins: the effect of initial lithospheric structure", Non-Volcanic Rifting of Continental Margins: A Comparison of Evidence from Land and Sea, R. C. L. Wilson, R. B. Whitmarsh, B. Taylor, N. Froitzheim
Download citation file:
At several non-volcanic margins serpentinized peridotites occur within a wide continent–ocean transition (COT) and beneath the edge of the thinned continental crust. However, other margins such as the Woodlark Basin appear to have a sharp COT and no reported serpentinites. We investigate the thermal, magmatic and rheological evolution of margins during extension as a function of initial lithospheric structure, rift duration and stretching factor. For cratonic and old orogen models, the entire crust should become brittle at stretching factors c. 3–4. The resultant crust-cutting faults allow water to reach and serpentinize the mantle, leading to the development of serpentinite décollements at the crust–mantle boundary and exhumation of mantle at the COT. Our predictions are consistent with the spatial limit and thickness of serpentinites at the SW Greenland and West Iberia margins, and the Rockall Trough. They also explain the absence of a broad zone of unroofed, serpentinized mantle at the COT of the Woodlark Basin: here the crust was too thick and hot for serpentinites to form before break-up. Larger melt production than in the West Iberia type margins and concentration of the lithospheric strength in the crust leads to synchronous crustal separation and lithospheric failure, yielding a sharp COT.
Figures & Tables
Non-Volcanic Rifting of Continental Margins: A Comparison of Evidence from Land and Sea
Non-volcanic continental margins may form up to 30% all present-day passive margins, and remnants of them are preserved in mountain belts. The papers in this volume demonstrate the benefits of integrating offshore and onshore studies, and illustrate the range of information obtained at different scales when comparing evidence from land and sea. Data sets collected across a range of spatial scales are evaluated: thin sections, cores, outcrops, seismic reflection profiles, and other geophysical data. The outcrop scale is crucial because it enables the spatial gulf to be bridged between DSDP and ODP cores and marine seismic data. There is also the problem that basins on land and beneath the sea inevitably have had different post-rift histories resulting in their contrasting present-day elevation. In mountain belts, portions of continental margins and oceanic crust are superbly exposed, but dismembered by subsequent compressional tectonics. Off present-day passive margins, extensional features have only been slightly deformed, if at all, by compressional movements, but are buried beneath significant thicknesses of post-rift sediments and so can only be sampled by ocean drilling at a small number of points.
The first paper reviews the synergies that have occurred between investigations of the eastern North Atlantic non-volcanic margins and remnants of similar Mesozoic margins preserved in the Alps, and some later papers return to this theme. However, papers describing margins from other parts of the world show that it may be premature to use models based on the Atlantic and the Alps as the paradigm for all non-volcanic margins. The following 25 papers in the book are grouped under the following headings: (1) Margin overviews; (2) Exhumed crust and mantle; (3) Tectonics and stratigraphy; (4)Numerical models of extension and magmatism.