The (U-Th)/He dating technique is an essential tool in Earth science research with diverse thermochronologic, geochronologic, and detrital applications. It is now used in a wide range of tectonic, structural, petrological, sedimentary, geomorphic, volcanological, and planetary studies. While in some circumstances the interpretation of (U-Th)/He data is relatively straightforward, in other cases it is less so. In some geologic contexts, individual analyses of the same mineral from a single sample are expected to yield dates that differ well beyond their analytical uncertainty owing to variable He diffusion kinetics. Although much potential exists to exploit this phenomenon to decipher more detailed thermal history information, distinguishing interpretable intra-sample data variation caused by kinetic differences between crystals from uninterpretable overdispersion caused by other factors can be challenging. Nor is it always simple to determine under what circumstances it is appropriate to integrate multiple individual analyses using a summary statistic such as a mean sample date or to decide on the best approach for incorporating data into the interpretive process of thermal history modeling. Here we offer some suggestions for evaluating data, attempt to summarize the current state of thinking on the statistical characterization of data sets, and describe the practical choices (e.g., model structure, path complexity, data input, weighting of different geologic and chronologic information) that must be made when setting up thermal history models. We emphasize that there are no hard and fast rules in any of these realms, which continue to be an important focus of improvement and community discussion, and no single interpretational and modeling philosophy should be forced on data sets. The guiding principle behind all suggestions made here is for transparency in reporting the steps and assumptions associated with evaluating, integrating, and interpreting data, which will promote the continued development of (U-Th)/He chronology.
Research Article|
April 20, 2022
(U-Th)/He chronology: Part 2. Considerations for evaluating, integrating, and interpreting conventional individual aliquot data
R.M. Flowers;
R.M. Flowers
1
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
R.A. Ketcham;
R.A. Ketcham
2
Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
E. Enkelmann;
E. Enkelmann
3
Geoscience Department, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
C. Gautheron;
C. Gautheron
4
Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, GEOPS, 91405 Orsay, France
Search for other works by this author on:
P.W. Reiners;
P.W. Reiners
5
Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
J.R. Metcalf;
J.R. Metcalf
1
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
M. Danišík;
M. Danišík
6
John de Laeter Centre, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia 6845, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
D.F. Stockli;
D.F. Stockli
2
Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
R.W. Brown
R.W. Brown
7
School of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
GSA Bulletin (2022)
Article history
received:
03 Aug 2021
rev-recd:
04 Dec 2021
accepted:
03 Feb 2022
first online:
20 Apr 2022
Citation
R.M. Flowers, R.A. Ketcham, E. Enkelmann, C. Gautheron, P.W. Reiners, J.R. Metcalf, M. Danišík, D.F. Stockli, R.W. Brown; (U-Th)/He chronology: Part 2. Considerations for evaluating, integrating, and interpreting conventional individual aliquot data. GSA Bulletin 2022; doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/B36268.1
Download citation file:
data&figures
Data & Figures
contents
Contents
georef
GeoRef
supplements
Supplements
references
References
related
Related