The field of (U-Th)/He geochronology and thermochronology has grown enormously over the past ∼25 years. The tool is applicable across much of geologic time, new (U-Th)/He chronometers are under continuous development, and the method is used in a diverse array of studies. Consequently, the technique has a rapidly expanding user base, and new labs are being established worldwide. This presents both opportunities and challenges. Currently there are no universally agreed-upon protocols for reporting measured (U-Th)/He data or data derivatives. Nor are there standardized practices for reporting He diffusion kinetic, 4He/3He, or continuous ramped heating data. Approaches for reporting uncertainties associated with all types of data also vary widely. Here, we address these issues. We review the fundamentals of the methods, the types of materials that can be dated, how data are acquired, the process and choices associated with data reduction, and make recommendations for data and uncertainty reporting. We advocate that both the primary measured and derived data be reported, along with statements of assumptions, appropriate references, and clear descriptions of the methods used to compute derived data from measured values. The adoption of more comprehensive and uniform approaches to data and uncertainty reporting will enable data to be re-reduced in the future with different interpretative contexts and data reduction methods, and will facilitate inter-comparison of data sets generated by different laboratories. Together, this will enhance the value, cross-disciplinary use, reliability, and ongoing development of (U-Th)/He chronology.
Research Article|
April 20, 2022
(U-Th)/He chronology: Part 1. Data, uncertainty, and reporting
R.M. Flowers;
R.M. Flowers
1
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
P.K. Zeitler;
P.K. Zeitler
2
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lehigh University, Pennsylvania 18015, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
M. Danišík;
M. Danišík
3
John de Laeter Centre, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia 6845, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
P.W. Reiners;
P.W. Reiners
4
Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
C. Gautheron;
C. Gautheron
5
Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, GEOPS, 91405 Orsay, France
Search for other works by this author on:
R.A. Ketcham;
R.A. Ketcham
6
Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
J.R. Metcalf;
J.R. Metcalf
1
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
D.F. Stockli;
D.F. Stockli
6
Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
E. Enkelmann;
E. Enkelmann
7
Geoscience Department, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4
Search for other works by this author on:
R.W. Brown
R.W. Brown
8
School of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
GSA Bulletin (2022)
Article history
received:
02 Aug 2021
rev-recd:
13 Nov 2021
accepted:
25 Jan 2022
first online:
20 Apr 2022
Citation
R.M. Flowers, P.K. Zeitler, M. Danišík, P.W. Reiners, C. Gautheron, R.A. Ketcham, J.R. Metcalf, D.F. Stockli, E. Enkelmann, R.W. Brown; (U-Th)/He chronology: Part 1. Data, uncertainty, and reporting. GSA Bulletin 2022; doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/B36266.1
Download citation file:
data&figures
Data & Figures
contents
Contents
georef
GeoRef
supplements
Supplements
references
References
related
Related