Abstract

Some of the most useful criteria for the deduction of the sense of shear are summarized for use in areas where unequivocal field evidence is lacking. Apparently conflicting evidence from rotated pressure-shadow regions around porphyroclasts and porphyroblasts is clarified. The use of quartz-crystallographic fabric asymmetry to deduce the shear sense in the bulk rock should be treated with caution and used only together with detailed microstructural observations.

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview
You do not currently have access to this article.