(v. 11, no. 5, p. 1590–1606, https://doi.org/10.1130/GES00999.1)
In this paper, there are two errors that change the meaning of the data in Figure 2. The lower-right scale label should be “Energy flux”. Also, the second sentence of the caption should be:
White represents high energy flux of propagating internal waves, in practice areas of probable larger amplitude waves and greater oscillating current components due to them.
Also, the second sentence of the fourth paragraph in the section Relationships to the Modern Internal Wave Field should be:
All eroding and/or nondepositional sites were found to be separated from all depositing sites by an energy flux magnitude of 103 W m–1.