Abstract
Slab material transfer processes in continental arcs can be challenging to decipher because magmas are often characterized by significant contributions from continental material. In this study, we identified a Prototethyan continental arc (419–418 Ma) that is now located in the Dazhonghe area of the southeast Tibetan Plateau, which, based on Sr-Nd-Hf-O-Si isotope relationships, implies no detectable continental material contributions. The Dazhonghe arc rocks display much lower δ30Si values than modern arc rocks and average mantle; this is best explained by subduction of sponge-rich marine sediments, which are thought to have been the dominant marine organisms during the Neoproterozoic and early Paleozoic. Our mixing calculations reveal that only bulk mixing among sponge-rich sediments, altered oceanic crust (AOC), and the depleted mantle would be capable of accounting for all the Sr-Nd-Hf-O-Si isotope compositions. This finding implies that the Dazhonghe arc magmas were generated by melting of a mélange that formed at the slab-mantle interface. The Dazhonghe continental arc is the first for which mélange melting has been confirmed.
INTRODUCTION
Continental arcs form above subduction zones where the upper plate is composed of thick continental lithosphere and exhibits much stronger geochemical affinities with continental crust than oceanic arcs (Kelemen and Behn, 2016) because continental material contributions, which are absent in oceanic arcs, play an important role in their generation. With ongoing arc magmatism, which can be as long as 500 m.y., such as in the Andes (Ducea et al., 2015), the overlying continental crust is continuously consumed. Theoretically, the late phase of continental arc magmatism could assimilate little or no continental crust material and record the most depleted radioactive isotope compositions. However, the geochemical compositions, source nature, and petrogenetic processes of a continental arc without continental crust contributions are still enigmatic.
Arc rocks are characterized by negative anomalies in high field strength elements (HFSEs; i.e., Nb, Ta, and Ti) on primitive mantle–normalized multi-element spider diagrams, which are generally attributed to partial melting of a mantle wedge metasomatized by marine sediment melts and/or altered oceanic crust (AOC) fluids (Fig. 1A; Ulmer and Trommsdorff, 1995). An alternative genetic model for global arc rocks proposes that partial melting of subducted mélange can also explain such geochemical features (Bebout, 2007; Marschall and Schumacher, 2012; Nielsen and Marschall, 2017). In this model, sediments, AOC, and/or hydrated mantle physically mix to form hybrid mélange rocks along the interface between the subducted slab and the overlying mantle (Fig. 1B). This mélange subsequently rises into the mantle wedge, where it dehydrates and melts to form arc magmas. Ascertaining the model that characterizes continental arcs is still a pending problem because, to date, only oceanic arc data have been shown to conform to the mélange model (Nielsen and Marschall, 2017; Shu et al., 2022).
Radiogenic isotope ratios, such as Sr-Nd-Hf, together with trace-element ratios are effective in discriminating the mantle metasomatism and mélange genetic models for arc rocks (Nielsen and Marschall, 2017), but they cannot unambiguously distinguish continental crust from AOC and marine sediment contributions in arc magmas. This renders it challenging to use such data to investigate slab material transfer in continental arcs. As a complement, the stable O and Si isotope compositions may theoretically be used to test the two genetic models because marine sediments display significantly fractionated Si and O isotope compositions relative to the mantle (Sutton et al., 2013; Stamm et al., 2020). In this study, we selected the Prototethyan continental andesite arcs in the SE Tibetan Plateau as the target (Figs. S1 and S2 in the Supplemental Material1) and carried out elemental and Sr-Nd-Hf-Si-O isotope analyses to investigate their sources and their genetic mechanism.
PROTOTETHYAN SUTURE AND CONTINENTAL ARC BELT IN THE SE TIBETAN PLATEAU
A Prototethyan ocean developed during the late Neoproterozoic to early Paleozoic along the northern margin of eastern Gondwana in the southeastern Tibetan Plateau area (Wang et al., 2018). The southeast Tibetan Plateau is known as the Sanjiang (Three Rivers) tectonic zone in Chinese literature (Fig. S1B). Prototethyan oceanic crust relicts (i.e., Nantinghe ophiolites) and arc magmatic rocks occur along the Lancangjiang tectonic belt, which were then superimposed by Paleotethyan ocean subduction and subsequent collision between the Sibumasu and Indochina blocks during the Triassic (Wang et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2019).
One of the most complete arc volcanic sequences in the southeastern Tibetan Plateau occurs in the Dazhonghe area, 30 km east of the Nantinghe ophiolites, and it consists of basaltic andesite, andesite, andesitic tuff, dacite, dacitic tuff, rhyolite, rhyolitic tuff, and tuffaceous sand-stone with a total thickness of 3000 m (Fig. S2; Liu et al., 2019). These rocks show calc-alkaline arc-type elemental features, e.g., enrichments in large ion lithophile elements (LILEs) and depletions in HFSEs (Fig. S3). In tectonic discrimination diagrams, the Dazhonghe basalts and andesites (SiO2 < 63 wt%) plot in the volcanic arc field, and the felsic rocks (SiO2 > 63 wt%) plot in the volcanic arc granite field (Liu et al., 2019). Between the Dazhonghe arc and Nantinghe ophiolite, Neoproterozoic crustal materials (i.e., Lancang Group) crop out (Fig. S1B). Therefore, the Dazhonghe arc is a typical continental arc.
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Zircon U-Pb ages and whole-rock element and Sr-Nd isotope data were reported previously (Liu et al., 2019), and the present study carried out in situ zircon Lu-Hf-O isotope and whole-rock Si isotope analyses on the Dazhonghe arc rocks. Analytical methods are described in the Supplemental Material and results are listed in Tables S1–S4 therein.
In Situ Zircon Lu-Hf-O Isotopes
Two samples were selected for Lu-Hf-O isotope analyses, with 14 and 13 individual zircon measurements, respectively. The stated errors for Hf isotope signatures refer to 2 standard error (SE). The mean O isotope values were δ18O = + 5.3‰ ± 0.3‰ and +5.5‰ ± 0.3‰, and mean εHf(t) values were +14.8 ± 2.9 and +14.3 ± 2.9, respectively (Fig. 2; Fig. S4). These high zircon εHf(t) values are consistent with the corresponding whole-rock radiogenic Nd isotope compositions, which ranged from εNd(t) = + 5.5 to +4.9 (Fig. 3; Liu et al., 2019). However, the melt O isotope compositions, recalculated from the zircon values using the equation [melt δ18O ≈ zircon δ18O + 0.0612 × (SiO2 wt%) – 2.5] (Valley et al., 2005), exhibited values substantially higher than the mantle (Fig. 2A), indicating the presence of a crustal component in the Dazhonghe arc magmas.
Whole-Rock Si Isotope Results
The Dazhonghe volcanic samples displayed low δ30Si values of -0.47‰ to -0.71‰, which are much lighter than those of previously reported continental crust, island-arc basalt, mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB), ocean-island basalt, and average mantle (Fig. 4; Savage et al., 2011, 2012; Pringle et al., 2016). Furthermore, fractional crystallization produces residual melts that are progressively enriched in the heavy Si isotopes (Savage et al., 2014), which is opposite to the observed low δ30Si values (Fig. 4).
DISCUSSION
No Continental Crust Contribution
One sample studied here, 15YN-41G2, had low SiO2 content (49.88 wt%) and high Mg# (61.80). Hence, the Dazhonghe volcanic rocks cannot have been derived exclusively from continental crust melting. Mantle-derived magmas in a continental arc are always likely to assimilate or be contaminated by crustal materials during their rise through the continental crust (Mackie et al., 2005). However, the following observations argue against significant continental material contributions to the generation of the Dazhonghe arc rocks:
Significant crustal assimilation would produce unradiogenic Nd and Hf isotope values, which are not observed in the Dazhonghe arc rocks (Figs. 2 and 3). Our samples have high whole-rock εNd(t) (mean value +5.2) and zircon εHf(t) values (weighted average value +14.6 ± 2.9), even higher than the contemporaneous depleted mantle–derived Nantinghe ophiolites (εNd[t] = + 1.9, zircon εHf[t] = + 5.0; Liu et al., 2019). Juvenile crust typically has more unradiogenic Nd and Hf isotope compositions than contemporaneous ophiolites, such as those found in the Nantinghe area, which implies that juvenile crust assimilation was likely very minor.
The δ30Si values (-0.47‰ to -0.71‰) are much lower than those previously reported for the continental crust (Savage et al., 2013). Crustal assimilation would only produce δ30Si values lower than the mantle if S-type granites were added (Fig. 4A). However, the range of δ30Si values in S-type granites is -0.11 to -0.41, which does not overlap with our samples (δ30Si = -0.47 to -0.71).
Crustal contamination, if any, might decrease the Nb/La ratios, resulting in a positive correlation between MgO and Nb/La ratios. No such correlations were observed in our samples (Liu et al., 2019).
The addition of crustal materials to mafic magma produces plagioclase and pyroxene with resorbed cores and oscillatory zoning. No such plagioclase or pyroxene was found in the Dazhonghe volcanic rocks (Liu et al., 2019).
Mixed Source of Subducted Mélange and Depleted Mantle
Element and isotope fractionations are different for the mantle-wedge metasomatism and mélange melting models of mantle source enrichment in subduction zones, which enables us to test which model more accurately reproduces observed data in arc lavas (Nielsen and Marschall, 2017). Here, we used some of the same tests previously developed (Nielsen and Marschall, 2017) and further used our new Si-O isotope data to perform additional tests.
Sr-Nd Isotope and Elemental Evidence
In the metasomatized mantle model with sediment melting and AOC and/or serpentinite dehydration, trace-element fractionation occurs within the slab, followed by mixing of these mobile components with the mantle wedge. In contrast, mélange models invoke physical mixing of the different bulk slab components first, followed by melting and dehydration processes that cause trace-element fractionation. Hence, the key to discriminating these two models is identifying the mixing end members: marine sediment and AOC, or sediment melts, AOC fluids, and subarc mantle (Fig. 1). Both sediment melts and AOC fluids display similar Sr-Nd isotope compositions and much lower Nd/Sr ratios than their respective bulk counterparts (marine sediment and AOC), and mixing curves between the mantle and these components in Sr-Nd isotope space have very different curvatures from those dominated by the mixing of bulk sediment (and bulk AOC) and the subarc mantle (Nielsen and Marschall, 2017). We chose Sr and Nd partition coefficients of 7.3 and 0.35, respectively, following previous work (Hermann and Rubatto, 2009), and performed binary mixing calculations between depleted MORB mantle (DMM) and marine sediment and AOC, or sediment melts, respectively. The Dazhonghe samples plot between the DMM–marine sediment and DMMAOC mixing lines, far away from the DMM–sediment melt mixing trajectories (Fig. 3A).
Both Hf and Nd show low mobility in hydrous fluids, so the Hf/Nd ratio of arc magmas may be the result of fractionation during either sediment or mélange melting, and their Nd isotope variations should primarily relate to mixing of the mantle with either sediment melts or bulk sediment (Nielsen and Marschall, 2017). Mixing between the mantle and bulk sediment or mixing between the mantle and sediment melts will follow different lines, as shown in Figure 3B. The Dazhonghe samples show limited variation in Nd isotopes and variable Hf/Nd ratios and fall along horizontal partial melting lines. The large variation in Hf/Nd at almost invariant Nd isotope compositions, therefore, suggests that the trace-element fractionation occurred after mixing of the different slab and mantle components, consistent with a mélange melting scenario (Fig. 3B).
We also carried out mixing calculations of sediment melt and DMM using Sr and Si isotope data (Fig. 4B). The mixing lines again reveal that the Dazhonghe samples plot far away from the sediment melt and DMM mixing lines (Fig. 4B). Thus, the Sr-Nd-Si isotope compositions of the Dazhonghe rocks preclude their derivation from partial melting of a metasomatized mantle wedge and show they were inherited from bulk mixing of subducted sediment, AOC, and depleted mantle.
Si Isotope Evidence
The Si isotopes in mantle-derived rocks are resistant to minor degrees of chemical weathering, mineral dissolution and precipitation, and partial melting (Schauble et al., 2009; Savage et al., 2011). All mantle-derived rocks (including modern arc lavas) exhibit invariant δ30Si = -0.29‰ ± 0.07‰, as shown in Figure 4. Authigenic clay minerals can have light Si isotope compositions (as low as δ30Si -2.3‰ for kaolinite), but most show variable δ30Si values of -2.3‰ to +1.8‰ (Douthitt, 1982; Trower and Fischer, 2019). Bulk pelagic clay–rich sediments rarely consist exclusively of authigenic clays, and they have Si isotope compositions rather similar to bulk silicate earth (δ30Si ~ -0.29‰; Ehlert et al., 2016; Trower and Fischer, 2019). We assumed the δ30Si value for authigenic clays to be -1‰ according to Trower and Fischer (2019) and then did mixing calculations between DMM and authigenic clay minerals as shown in Figure 2. The results revealed that pelagic clay–rich sediments are an unlikely component to account for the observed data. Thus, only Si-bearing marine organisms (e.g., diatoms and marine sponges) preferentially take up the light Si isotopes by up to several per mil, which causes Si-rich marine sediments to display light Si isotope compositions relative to the mantle (Sutton et al., 2013; Stamm et al., 2020). The low δ30Si values in the Dazhonghe samples could, therefore, be explained by a subducted sediment component rich in biogenic silica. However, modern Si-rich (diatom-rich) sediments typically display δ30Si > -1‰ (Sutton et al., 2013), which would require sediment addition of 20%–30% in order to account for the full range of δ30Si values observed in the Dazhonghe samples (Fig. 4B). Such amounts of Si-rich sediment contamination of the mantle wedge in a subduction zone are unrealistic and would produce whole-rock δ18O, Sr, and Nd isotope compositions very different to those recorded in the lavas (Figs. 2B and 4B).
The Prototethyan ocean existed during the late Neoproterozoic to early Paleozoic, when marine sponges were important parts of the marine ecosystem and probably the dominant Si-bearing component in marine sediments (Li et al., 1998; De La Rocha, 2003). Si iso-topic fractionation in marine sponges is much larger than that for diatoms, with δ30Si values of marine sponges varying from -6.74‰ to -1.50‰ (Cassarino et al., 2018). Binary mixing calculations using sponge-rich marine sediment and AOC as two end members resulted in mixing lines that reproduced the Dazhonghe δ30Si values, while only requiring less than ~5% of sediment addition (Figs. 2 and 4B).
Zircon Hf-O Isotope Evidence
Our mixing calculations using Si-rich marine sediment and AOC, and Si-rich marine sediment and DMM indicated that ~5% sponge-rich marine sediment and ~95% DMM could have produced the Hf-O isotope compositions of the Dazhonghe arc rocks (Fig. 2A), similar to those of the O-Si isotopes. Furthermore, mixing between marine sediments and mantle wedge can also account for the Nd and Hf isotope compositions, as shown in the Figure S5.
CONCLUSIONS
The combined evidence from radiogenic Hf-Nd-Sr isotopes and Si-O stable isotopes revealed that the Paleozoic Dazhonghe continental arc in the southeastern Tibetan Plateau was formed through subduction of marine sponge–rich sediments that formed a mélange at the slab-mantle interface. The arc lavas likely represent the latest stages of subduction zone volcanism associated with the Prototethyan subduction. The Dazhonghe arc is the first continental arc for which it has been shown that mélange melting was the driving force for arc magma generation.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
H.C. Liu thanks the Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing (grant 2462018YJRC030) for financial support. S.G. Nielsen acknowledges support from U.S. National Science Foundation grant EAR-1829546. This manuscript benefited from reviews by Martin Guitreau and an anonymous reviewer, and efficient editorial handling by Gerald Dickens.