ORIGINAL ARTICLE: 2018, v. 46, no. 10, p. 923–926, https://doi.org/10.1130/G45144.1. First published 11 September 2018.

ERRATUM PUBLICATION: 2018, v. 46, no. 11, p. 1023, https://doi.org/10.1130/G45144E.1.

In Figure 2, the vertical axis labels of panel C are incorrect. The numbers on the vertical axis, from bottom to top, should be 101, 102, and 103.

Figure 2.

Meander length (A) and amplitude (C) as a function of upstream river width. Vertically aligned symbols indicate along-channel variation per system. Numbers correspond to systems in Table DR2 (see footnote 1). B,D: Dimensions as a function of local channel width, and comparison with fluvial and tidal meanders. Regression in B is based on data from this study only. Confidence limits (95%) are indicated by the 2σ value.

Figure 2.

Meander length (A) and amplitude (C) as a function of upstream river width. Vertically aligned symbols indicate along-channel variation per system. Numbers correspond to systems in Table DR2 (see footnote 1). B,D: Dimensions as a function of local channel width, and comparison with fluvial and tidal meanders. Regression in B is based on data from this study only. Confidence limits (95%) are indicated by the 2σ value.