A journal relies on its referees. Ideally, referees should accept as many review requests as possible and return their reviews in a timely manner. Ideally, they should also be perspicacious, incisive, and fair, remarking equally on the strengths and weaknesses of a manuscript. As many editors have commented, the ideal reviewer reviews as he or she would like himself or herself to be reviewed. As a token of our appreciation for reviewers who have fulfilled these demanding criteria, the editors of Geology have nominated the following as “exceptional reviewers.”
You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
