We welcome J.D. Archibald's comment because it signifies that workers on both sides of the extinction controversy finally agree that the “3 m gap” does not imply that dinosaurs were in decline prior to the Cretaceous-Tertiary impact. We hope that this will no longer be an issue, and that was the goal of our paper.

Archibald suggests that the 3 m gap was not used in earlier literature to deny an abrupt extinction. We disagree because several reviews (e.g., MacLeod et al., 1997; Williams, 1994; Sarjeant, 1996) continue to cite this “rule” to deny abrupt extinction. The...

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview
You do not currently have access to this article.