Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination

An examination of G. K. Gilbert’s methodological works leaves some doubt as to the role he meant to assign to analogies in the quest for geological knowledge. The drawing of analogies can have only limited utility in a historical discipline, such as geology, in which it is supposed that each phenomenon encountered is assignable, at least in principle, to a kind of phenomenon identified by an extant physical theory.

You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Figures & Tables

Contents

References

Related

Citing Books via

Related Book Content
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal