Abstract This chapter summarizes the tectonic events that have affected the region of the Arabian Intrashelf Basin and the development of the intrashelf basin. Precambrian–Infracambrian fault systems provided a structural framework, which was later reactivated during the Late Paleozoic. Further development along the structural trends continued in the Triassic and Early Jurassic with the development of an Early Jurassic tectonically controlled intrashelf basin. The accommodation space was filled with Dhruma Formation carbonates by the early Bathonian, resulting in a broad and fairly flat platform. A crucial factor is how suppressed tectonism was during the Mid- and Late Jurassic. The intrashelf basin developed on the broad, tectonically stable Tethyan passive margin continental shelf 200--300 km distant from the Tethyan outer shelf edge. During the Mid- and Late Jurassic, this tectonic stability provided the foundation for a broad, stable Tethyan continental shelf region at least 1000 × 1200 km in area, far removed from siliciclastic sources, within which the huge Arabian Intrashelf Basin formed and the sequences of carbonate rocks and evaporites that created the Jurassic hydrocarbon system were deposited. Tectonism during the Mid- to Late Jurassic evolution of the Arabian Intrashelf Basin initially included only moderate subsidence. There was subtle uplift along some of the structural trends in the Late Jurassic and uplift and westwards structural tilt along the Tethys oceanic margin. Relatively stable tectonism continued after the Jurassic and was a major factor in the accumulation of the vast reserves of Jurassic sourced oil. Tectonic stability prevented major faulting and structural compartmentalization of the basin features, which provided large areas for hydrocarbon migration as the large and broad anticlines developed into the huge structural traps. The lack of major faulting limited the movement of burial fluids, preserving the early formed porosity and the regionally extensive seals. The present day structures primarily developed from the Late Cretaceous to Miocene as the Tethys Ocean closed.

Abstract The Endurance, four-way, dip-closed structure in UK Blocks 42/25 and 43/21 occurs over a salt swell diapir and within Triassic and younger strata. The Lower Triassic Bunter Sandstone Formation reservoir within the structure was tested twice for natural gas (in 1970 and 1990) but both wells were dry. The reservoir is both thick and high quality and, as such, an excellent candidate site for subsurface CO 2 storage. In 2013 a consortium led by National Grid Carbon drilled an appraisal well on the structure and undertook an injection test ahead of a planned development of Endurance as the first bespoke storage site on the UK Continental Shelf with an expected injection rate of 2.68 × 10 6 t of dense phase CO 2 each year for 20 years. The site was not developed following the UK Government's removal of financial support for carbon capture and storage (CCS) demonstration projects, but it is hoped with the recent March 2020 Budget that government support for CCS may now be back on track.

Abstract Unocal discovered the Acorn South Field with wells 29/8b-2 and 29/8b-2s in 1983. The well and its side-track found a small accumulation of oil in Upper Jurassic, Fulmar Formation sandstones in an inter-pod setting. Well 29/8b-3 drilled two years later on what was thought to be the same structure found Acorn North, a larger accumulation of oil in a Triassic Skagerrak Formation reservoir on the crest of a Triassic pod. Premier discovered the Beechnut Field two years later, well 29/9b-2 finding oil in the Fulmar and Skagerrak formations in a faulted, inter-pod setting. Both Acorn and Beechnut are deep, high-pressure and high-temperature fields with complex reservoir stratigraphy due to halokinesis during sedimentation and post-depositional structuration. The Skagerrak Formation reservoir in Acorn North is appreciably poorer than similar-age reservoirs further north whilst the Fulmar Formation in Beechnut is relatively poorly developed. Acorn's mid-case oil in place is 90 MMbbl in the Skagerrak Formation and 13 MMbbl in the Fulmar Formation and, for Beechnut, is 15 MMbbl in the Fulmar Formation. Neither field has been developed. Limiting factors include the resource size, variable reservoir development (Beechnut), modest reservoir quality (Acorn North), compartmentalization concerns and development costs.

Abstract The Howe and Bardolino fields lie in UK Blocks 22/12a and 22/13a, respectively, on the eastern flank of the Forties–Montrose High. The Howe Field was discovered in 1987 by well 22/12a-1, and Bardolino in 1988 with well 22/13a-1ST. Both share common Jurassic reservoirs, have Upper Jurassic Kimmeridge Clay Formation top seals, require some form of lateral seal and have similar fluids. Howe has been producing relatively dry oil throughout its production life, indicating relatively good connectivity across the field area. In contrast, the Bardolino accumulation is proven to be compartmentalized. Bardolino is likely to be segmented through some fault-related mechanism. In place volumes at the Howe Field are 46.8 MMbbl, with 17 MMbbl produced thus far through a combination of natural aquifer and solution gas cap drive by subsea development well 22/12a-9Z. In place volumes at the Bardolino Field are 11.2 MMbbl, with 1.1 MMbbl produced to date through depletion drive by a subsea development well 22/13a-8. This represents recovery rates of 35% for Howe and 10% for Bardolino to date. In place volumes for the undeveloped Pentland Formation at Howe are 5 MMbbl. In place estimates for the undeveloped Kimmeridge Clay Formation sandstones at Bardolino are 8 MMbbl.

Abstract Lomond is a gas–condensate field on the east flank of the Central Graben UK Continental Shelf, some 230 km east of Aberdeen in Block 23/21. The field was discovered in 1972 and was developed with nine production wells from an integrated production platform. Lomond is a large salt-induced anticline with four-way dip closure. The reservoir comprises Paleocene turbidite sandstones with the majority of the hydrocarbon volume in the Forties Sandstone Member and the top seal is provided by laterally extensive mudstones of the Sele Formation. The field is structurally compartmentalized with three different hydrocarbon–water contacts, but with the gas leg in pressure communication. Significant reservoir and structural complexities are observed in Lomond Field; however, the production behaviour exhibits classical tank-like depletion behaviour over its production history. With a very high recovery factor to date, the field has produced 883 bcf or 86% of the gas resource initially in place.

Abstract The Clair Field is a giant oilfield containing in the region of 6–7 Bbbl of stock tank oil initially in place, located approximately 75 km west of the Shetland Islands. As such, it represents the single biggest hydrocarbon accumulation on the UK Continental Shelf. Clair was discovered in 1977, but first production did not occur from Phase 1 until 2005, after a lengthy appraisal period. The major appraisal milestone occurred in 1991 after well 206/8-8 proved up fractured clastic red beds of the Devonian Lower Clair Group. This was followed up with an extended well test on 206/8-10Z, which demonstrated the longer-term performance of the reservoir. Further appraisal on Clair Ridge led to the sanction of the Clair Ridge, which came on stream in November 2018. Following the Greater Clair appraisal programme in 2013–15, development options are currently being worked for Clair South, which will develop the Lower Clair Group reservoirs together with overlying shallow-marine reservoirs of the Cretaceous and Jurassic.

Abstract The application of production geochemistry techniques has been shown to provide abundant and often low-cost high-value fluid information that helps to maximize and safeguard production. Critical aspects to providing successful data relate to the appropriate sampling strategy and sampling selection which are generally project-aim-specific. In addition, the continuous direct integration of the production geochemistry data with subsurface and surface understanding is pivotal. Examples from two specific areas have been presented including: (a) the effective use of IsoTubes in the production realm; and (b) the application of geochemical fingerprinting primarily based on multidimensional gas chromatography. Mud gas stable carbon isotopes from low-cost IsoTubes have been shown to be very effective in recognizing within-well fluid compartments, as well as recognizing specific hydrocarbon seals in overburden section, including the selective partial seal for only C 2+ gas species. With respect to geochemical fingerprinting, examples have been presented related to reservoir surveillance including compartmentalization, lateral and vertical connectivity, as well as fluid movements and fault/baffle breakthrough. The production-related examples focus on fluid allocation within a single well, as well as on its application for pipeline residence times, fluid identification and well testing.

Abstract Faults are known to affect the way that fluids can flow in clastic oil and gas reservoirs. Fault barriers either stop fluids from passing across or they restrict and direct the fluid flow, creating static or dynamic reservoir compartments. Representing the effect of these barriers in reservoir models is key to establishing optimal plans for reservoir drainage, field development and production. Fault property modelling is challenging, however, as observations of faults in nature show a rapid and unpredictable variation in fault rock content and architecture. Fault representation in reservoir models will necessarily be a simplification, and it is important that the uncertainty ranges are captured in the input parameters. History matching also requires flexibility in order to handle a wide variety of data and observations. The Juxtaposition Table Method is a new technique that efficiently handles all relevant geological and production data in fault property modelling. The method provides a common interface that is easy to relate to for all petroleum technology disciplines, and allows a close cooperation between the geologist and reservoir engineer in the process of matching the reservoir model to observed production behaviour. Consequently, the method is well suited to handling fault property modelling in the complete life cycle of oil and gas fields, starting with geological predictions and incorporating knowledge of dynamic reservoir behaviour as production data become available.

Abstract The Holstein Field consists of poorly lithified turbidite sands deposited during the Pliocene Epoch. Dense arrays of cataclastic deformation bands have been observed in all cores from wells that penetrate the K2 reservoir sand, the highest density of which are located near the hinge of a monocline. The predominant set of deformation bands strikes parallel to the fold axis, and dips at both high and low angles with respect to bedding. Deformation band orientation and offset of marker beds indicate reverse shear and are consistent with a flexural slip origin during folding. Restorations suggest that the monocline and associated deformation bands formed early during the burial process with high pore pressure. Reservoir permeability estimates from well tests indicate a bulk permeability approximately one-third of the reservoir core permeability in regions with deformation bands, whereas other areas are unaffected. Bulk permeability estimated from the permeability of the reservoir and deformation band network is lower than the reservoir permeability alone, but exceeds the permeability observed in the well tests by a factor of 2. A reduction in permeability of oil relative to water for both the fault and host sand is required to match the well-test permeability with that measured from core.