ABSTRACT Numerous examples of transverse drainages in the Apennines inspired early, forward-thinking models to describe how rivers established and maintained their courses as mountains were being raised beneath them. We assemble the rate of base-level fall (τ- U ) and associated channel χ-z data of ten transverse rivers draining the Apennine pro-wedge using a channel stream power linear inverse approach. We apply the results to evaluate competing models of transverse drainage development as well as the underlying dynamic and tectonic processes responsible for Apennine topography. The channel inversion approach employs the simplifying assumption of uniform uplift and erosion at the catchment scale, but accounts for variable rock erodibility as the first-order determinant of regional, mean channel steepness. Accordingly, local deviations in channel steepness are interpreted by the model as transient upstream-propagating waves of base-level fall originating at the catchment mouth. Modeled timing, rate, and unsteadiness of these base-level falls are broadly consistent with geomorphic, geologic, thermochronologic, and paleo-elevation isotopic data, indicating that the Apennines emerged impulsively at ~2.5 Ma at rates ranging from ~0.2–0.3 mm/yr for the central Apennines to rates of ~0.7 mm/yr for the southern Apennines. Syn-deformation and foreland-propagating superposition dominate transverse drainage development for the northern and north-central Apennines, which are underlain by an intact Adriatic slab. In contrast, further south where a slab window separates the Adriatic slab from the base of the Apennine wedge, dynamic uplift prevails and the transverse drainages have developed in response to regional superposition and integration of catchments through spillover and headwater capture processes.

Abstract High Mountain Asia contains the largest volume of glacier ice outside the polar regions, and contain the headwaters of some of the largest rivers in central Asia. These glaciers are losing mass at a mean rate of between –0.18 and –0.5 m water equivalent per year. While glaciers in the Himalaya are generally shrinking, those in the Karakoram have experienced a slight mass gain. Both changes have occurred in response to rising air temperatures due to Northern Hemisphere climate change. In the westerly influenced Indus catchment, glacier meltwater makes up a large proportion of the hydrological budget, and loss of glacier mass will ultimately lead to a decrease in water supplies. In the monsoon-influenced Ganges and Brahmaputra catchments, the contribution of glacial meltwater is relatively small compared to the Indus, and the decrease in annual water supplies will be less dramatic. Therefore, enhanced glacier melt will increase river flows until the middle of the twenty-first century, but in the longer term, into the latter part of this century, river flows will decline as glaciers shrink. Declining meltwater supplies may be compensated by increases in precipitation, but this could exacerbate the risk of flooding.