The bedding-plane anisotropy and structural configuration of the Mesoproterozoic Belt-Purcell Supergroup guided a narrow magmatic salient >350 km eastward from the Salmon River suture of Idaho to the foreland basin of central Montana, along a deep graben within the southern part of the Belt-Purcell Basin. The magma assimilated anatectic melt from the lower Belt-Purcell Supergroup in the western half of the graben, where the Lemhi subbasin had intersected and deepened the graben by several kilometers. The magma stepped across the stratigraphic section as it intruded eastward along the graben, spread laterally as it climbed into the overlying Paleozoic and Mesozoic strata, and eventually erupted into the foreland basin. This paper develops a model in which the magma formed a thick, east-tapering wedge beneath the Belt-Purcell carapace. The wedge elevated and tilted its lid, which failed along the trend of the graben to a terminus in the Crazy Mountains basin of the Helena structural salient, much like a tectonic-scale landslide. The carapace failed in two main phases between ca. 100 and 75 Ma. It slid ~100 km during the first failure phase, and ~40 km during the second, when the Boulder batholith and its volcanic cover filled a large pull-apart structure within the carapace. Slaty cleavage, tectonic slides that omit strata, and a nested series of hairpin-shaped allochthons characterize the failed carapace. Shear zones and nappes bound the carapace; the sinistral Lewis and Clark line bounds it on the north, and the dextral southwest Montana transverse zone bounds it on the south. The Lewis thrust fault and associated structures of the Rocky Mountain fold-and-thrust belt overprinted and displaced the magmatic salient and its carapace from ca. 74 to 59 Ma. The magma crystallized, cooled, and generated hydrothermal ore deposits from Late Cretaceous to middle Eocene time. Eocene extension overprinted the system from 53 to 39 Ma and exhumed its infrastructure in core complexes. Those exposures, together with regional structural tilt, enable reconstruction of a deep cross section of the magmatic wedge and its carapace.

It should be possible to infer the thermal state of the source terrane for granitic bodies, provided we have independent means to establish the chemical nature of this terrane. The chemical nature of the granitic rocks, including their degree of hydration, implies the solidus temperature. The concentration of the heat-producing radioactive elements in the granite (K, U, and Th) probably provides an upper estimate of their concentration in the source rock, which is an important thermal parameter. The depth and ambient temperature of the country rock into which the granite magma intruded provide useful boundary conditions for the thermal regime at the crustal level of anatexis. These constraints in turn form the bases for estimating the subcrustal thermal flux as well as the effective thermal interface for enhanced heat flow from below that resulted in anatexis. These inferences, in combination with other field-based parameters such as uplift rates and permissible time lapses for the geological events, permit realistic thermal modelling for the formation of granitic batholiths. The procedure is applied to the Late Cretaceous Pioneer and Boulder batholiths in southwestern Montana, U.S.A. The modelling results suggest that mantle upwelling, not subduction or thrust loading, caused anatexis. The isotopic chemistry of the granitic rocks rules out direct mixing of mantle magma, and field relations rule out crustal thinning as causes for partial melting.