ABSTRACT Mississippian (Tournaisian–Viséan) carbonate mounds in the Compton and Pierson limestones, Ozark region, North America, have been called Waulsortian. However, European Waulsortian mounds contain features such as geopetals with multigenerations of carbonate mud (polymuds) and stromatactis cavity systems that are rare to absent in Ozark mounds. To determine similarities and differences, examine their origins, and clarify nomenclature, mounds in the Compton and Pierson limestones are compared with Waulsortian mounds in the Feltrim Limestone, Ireland. Features considered included mound size, geometry, style of aggradation, composition, depositional setting, and diagenetic history. Mounds in the Compton and Pierson limestones are <10 m (33 ft) thick and form singular knoll-form or aggregates with a strong lateral growth component. In contrast, individual Waulsortian mounds in the Feltrim Limestone range from 5 to > 30 m ( 16 – 100 ft ) thick, but coalesce and vertically aggrade to form complexes that exceed 500 m ( 1600 ft ) . Pierson mounds are crinoidal and grain-rich, whereas Compton and Feltrim mounds are bryozoan-rich and mud-dominated. All mounds have similar cement stratigraphy and diagenetic histories. Mud-rich Compton mounds and Feltrim mounds are interpreted as deeper water than skeletal-rich Pierson mounds. Limited accommodation constrained Compton and Pierson mound size and forced lateral aggradation. Subsidence-driven accommodation in the Dublin Basin allowed Feltrim mounds to grow larger, coalesce, and aggrade vertically. Three types of mounds are recognized: true Waulsortian in the Feltrim Limestone, mud-cored Waulsortian-type Compton and Pierson mounds, and Pierson transported bioaccumulation mounds. Small dimensions of Waulsortian-type Pierson and Compton mounds limit their potential as oil and gas reservoirs, whereas Pierson crinoidal sediment piles are known to form reservoir-size accumulations.

ABSTRACT Facies analysis utilizing a conodont biostratigraphic framework is a powerful tool for evaluating genetic relationships of Osagean–basal Meramecian strata within the Ozark region (Arkansas–Missouri–Oklahoma) of the southern midcontinent. This investigation builds upon previous work cited herein, and suggests that some lithostratigraphic divisions, although useful in differentiating strata in a localized setting, may not be suitable for regional correlations within the Boone Group. High-resolution conodont biostratigraphy demonstrates the diachronous nature of lithostratigraphic divisions within the Boone Group, with both the Reeds Spring Formation and Bentonville Formation (Burlington–Keokuk) clearly becoming younger as they are traced from southwestern Missouri into northern Arkansas and northeastern Oklahoma. Subsequent facies analysis shows that the Reeds Spring Formation represents deposition within outer ramp through proximal middle ramp settings (low to moderate energy), whereas the Bentonville Formation (Burlington–Keokuk) records deposition within proximal middle ramp to inner ramp settings (moderate to high energy). Integration of facies analysis and conodont biostratigraphy-based relative chronostratigraphy provides the basis for construction of four time-slice maps illustrating the distribution of time-correlative facies belts. Together, these time-slice maps deliver a clearer representation of the evolution of Boone Group carbonate ramp deposition during the Osagean, which was characterized by overall shallowing-upward and progradation to south and southwest.