Abstract This chapter includes 11 cross-sections and one well log profile to show the depositional geometry and setting in specific areas around the basin: the Saudi Arabia outcrop belt; the Rimthan Arch; and the eastern and central areas of the intrashelf basin in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, Abu Dhabi and Oman. These cross-sections are used to demonstrate the similarity and degree of continuity of the upper Dhruma Formation, the Tuwaiq Mountain Formation, the source rock, the Hanifa, Jubaila–Arab and Arab–Hith formations and depositional sequences in these different locations in the basin. They show the manner in which the underlying platform formed, the rim developed, the source rock was deposited and the basin progressively filled. The blanket deposition of the Arab-D anhydrite was followed by the Arab-C to Arab-A and Hith carbonate and evaporite sequences. The cross-sections provide the framework used in subsequent chapters to make a series of facies maps and other interpretative diagrams and cross-sections that summarize and, for some intervals, revise the interpretation of the settings and geological events that formed the Arabian Intrashelf Basin.

Abstract Exploration of the Jurassic hydrocarbon system in the Arabian Intrashelf Basin area is in a mature state. Given the scale of the present day anticlinal structures and the adjacent synclines, all of the supergiant conventional fields trapped in huge anticlines have already been discovered. The theme throughout this Memoir has been to present the evolution of the self-contained Callovian–Tithonian Arabian Intrashelf Basin hydrocarbon system. Its size, c. 1200 × 450 km, is greater than that of the UK, larger than the Black Sea and almost as large as Turkey or the area of Texas and New Mexico in the USA. It is geologically much simpler than these regions, both in the exceptionally remarkable continuity of facies within the sequences that developed and filled the intrashelf basin and its relative tectonic simplicity, including up to the present day. The cross-sections, facies maps, depositional profiles and other data and interpretations presented in this Memoir have documented this remarkable continuity. The source rock interval is well-defined everywhere it occurs and is mature; enough oil has been generated and migrated so that every sealed trap with reservoir facies will have oil. Around and within the basin, shallow water ramp facies in each sequence are in the reservoir facies and the early-formed porosity has been preserved. The carbonate seals and, even more so, the evaporite seals are remarkably laterally continuous. Therefore the big issue in future exploration is finding a sealed trap with potential reserves large enough to be worth drilling when compared to known reserves and estimates of future production. This chapter discusses some possibilities for stratigraphic traps and unconventional plays. Potential plays have been and/or can be identified, but finding them in the present day structural setting is likely to be very difficult.

Abstract: Microporosity in carbonate reservoirs is generated by the complex interplay between depositional and diagenetic processes. This petrographical, SEM, fluid-inclusion and isotopic study of a Lower Cretaceous carbonate reservoir, Abu Dhabi, UAE, revealed that: (1) micritization of ooids and skeletal fragments, which resulted in spheroidal (rounded) micrite, accounts for most microporosity in peloidal packstones and grainstones; and (2) transformation of spheroidal micrite into subhedral/euhedral micrite and microspar, known as aggrading neomorphism, could happen via precipitation of syntaxial calcite overgrowths around micrite (micro-overgrowths) and not only, as suggested previously in the literature, by recrystallization involving the dissolution (of micrite) and reprecipitation (of microspar). Precipitation of calcite cement around micrite (i.e. destruction of microporosity) is more extensive in the water zone than in the oil zone, which is possibly contributing to the lower porosity and permeability of the carbonate reservoir in the water zone. Similarity in bulk oxygen isotopic values of micritized packstones and grainstones in the water and oil zones (average δ 18 O V-PDB = −7.2‰ and −7.8‰, respectively) is attributed to: (1) a small difference in temperatures between the crest (oil zone) and the flanks (water zone); and (2) calcite precipitation around micrite occurred prior and subsequent to oil emplacement. Bulk carbon and strontium isotopic compositions of micritized packstones and grainstones in the water and oil zones (average δ 13 C V-PDB = +3.7‰ and average 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratios = 0.707469) indicate that calcite cement was derived from marine porewaters and/or dissolution of the host limestones. The minimum formation temperatures of bulk micrite/microspar, which are inferred based on paragenetic relationships, fluid-inclusion microthermometry and oxygen isotope data, are around 58–78°C.