Abstract The removal of a large dam requires special engineering considerations not normally required for the removal of smaller dams. Large dams generally provide greater project benefits, but they represent a higher downstream hazard in the event of failure and greater challenges to fish passage. The reservoirs associated with large dams can impound more sediment and affect downstream water quality to a greater degree. The environmental compliance and decision-making process for a large dam removal project can take many years and will normally require the evaluation of a full range of project alternatives with estimated costs, the performance of a comprehensive environmental impact analysis, and the identification and implementation of extensive mitigation measures. Streamflow diversion and demolition plans for the removal of a large dam must ensure acceptable construction risks from start to finish, and produce reservoir drawdown at a controlled rate for sediment management purposes and to prevent instability of natural or embankment slopes. Large dams require more time for removal, at a higher cost, and contain greater volumes of materials for which disposal sites must be found.

Abstract Deep geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste (HLW) in a repository with a system of engineered and natural barriers has been recognized as an appropriate disposal concept by Chinese authorities since 2003, and both crystalline rocks and argillaceous rocks are considered as the candidate host rocks for HLW disposal repository. The 1:200 000 regional survey indicated that there are potential clay formations in Mesozoic–Cenozoic sedimentary basins in NW China. Five candidate areas have been suggested with potential clay formations including the Tamusu and Suhongtu areas with upper K 1 Bayingebi clay formations in the east Bayingebi Basin, in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. On the basis of a detailed ground geological, hydrological and geophysical surveys, two test boreholes drilled to a depth of 800 m in the Tamusu area revealed that there are three lacustrine-facies clay formations (K 1 b 2-3 , K 1 b 2-2 and K 1 b 2-1 ). The thickness of the K 1 b 2-3 and K 1 b 2-2 clay formations is about 300–600 m with sandstone and siltstone interbeds, while the thickness of the K 1 b 2-1 homogeneous clay formation is more than 200 m with the depth of 450 m below the surface. The spatial extension of the clay formations could meet the fundamental criteria to ensure the long-term safety of the repository. Initial mineralogical studies on core samples indicated that the mineral assemblage is dominated by analcite, kaolinite, illite and dolomite. The homogeneous argillaceous rocks rich in analcite in Tamusu area could be a new type of host rock for a HLW disposal repository.