- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
NARROW
GeoRef Subject
-
all geography including DSDP/ODP Sites and Legs
-
Asia
-
Far East
-
Japan (1)
-
-
-
Europe
-
Alps
-
Eastern Alps (1)
-
-
Carpathian Foredeep (1)
-
Central Europe
-
Austria
-
Burgenland Austria (1)
-
Lower Austria
-
Vienna Austria (9)
-
-
Styria Austria (1)
-
Upper Austria (1)
-
-
Bohemian Massif (1)
-
Czech Republic
-
Moravia
-
Brno Czech Republic (1)
-
-
-
Hungary (1)
-
Vienna Basin (2)
-
-
Pannonian Basin (1)
-
Southern Europe
-
Italy
-
Emilia-Romagna Italy (1)
-
-
-
-
-
commodities
-
oil and gas fields (1)
-
petroleum (1)
-
-
fossils
-
Invertebrata
-
Protista
-
Foraminifera (1)
-
-
-
microfossils
-
problematic microfossils
-
Bolboforma (1)
-
-
-
palynomorphs
-
Dinoflagellata (2)
-
-
problematic fossils
-
problematic microfossils
-
Bolboforma (1)
-
-
-
-
geologic age
-
Cenozoic
-
Tertiary
-
Neogene
-
Miocene
-
middle Miocene
-
Badenian (1)
-
Grund Formation (1)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
meteorites
-
meteorites (1)
-
-
Primary terms
-
Asia
-
Far East
-
Japan (1)
-
-
-
Cenozoic
-
Tertiary
-
Neogene
-
Miocene
-
middle Miocene
-
Badenian (1)
-
Grund Formation (1)
-
-
-
-
-
-
data processing (2)
-
Europe
-
Alps
-
Eastern Alps (1)
-
-
Carpathian Foredeep (1)
-
Central Europe
-
Austria
-
Burgenland Austria (1)
-
Lower Austria
-
Vienna Austria (9)
-
-
Styria Austria (1)
-
Upper Austria (1)
-
-
Bohemian Massif (1)
-
Czech Republic
-
Moravia
-
Brno Czech Republic (1)
-
-
-
Hungary (1)
-
Vienna Basin (2)
-
-
Pannonian Basin (1)
-
Southern Europe
-
Italy
-
Emilia-Romagna Italy (1)
-
-
-
-
geomorphology (1)
-
geophysical methods (1)
-
Invertebrata
-
Protista
-
Foraminifera (1)
-
-
-
meteorites (1)
-
museums (2)
-
oil and gas fields (1)
-
paleontology (1)
-
palynomorphs
-
Dinoflagellata (2)
-
-
petroleum (1)
-
problematic fossils
-
problematic microfossils
-
Bolboforma (1)
-
-
-
weathering (1)
-
well-logging (1)
-
Vienna Austria
ABSTRACT The nineteenth century was the dawn of scientific and systematic paleontology. The foundation of Natural History Museums—built as microcosmic “Books of Nature”—not only contributed to the establishment of this new discipline but also to its visual dissemination. This paper will take the metaphor of the “book” as a starting point for an examination of the paleontological exhibition at the Natural History Museum in Vienna. In keeping with “Natural Theology,” the earliest natural science museums in Britain were designed as expressions of the medieval idea of the “Holy Book of Nature.” Contrary to this, the Natural History Museum Vienna, opened in 1889, wanted to be a nonreligious museum of evolution. Nevertheless, the idea of the “book” was also influential for its design. According to the architects and the first director, it should be a modern “walk-in textbook” instructive for everyone. The most prominent exhibition hall in the museum is dedicated to paleontology. The hall’s decorative scheme forms a unique “Paleo-Gesamtkunstwerk” (Gesamtkunstwerk: total piece of art). The use of grotesque and mythological elements is a particularly striking feature of the hall’s decoration and raises the question of how this relates to the museum’s claim to be a hard-core science institution. As it was paleontology’s task to demystify the monsters and riddles of Earth history systematically, it seems odd that the decorative program connected explicitly to this world. This chapter sheds light on the cultural traditions that led to the creation of this ambiguous program that oscillates between science and imagination. Looking at the results of the research on the nature of the earth, one looks into a book that contains the oldest history we humans know. With amazement, we see the wonders of the first epochs of the earth arising before our mind’s eyes, and what until recently have been incomprehensible hieroglyphs is now almost completely clear to us. How many fables may have been created by the sudden appearance of prehistoric structures in the form of animals and plants? No fairy tales, no fantasies, tangible reality now stands before us and yet no less wonderful, even more wonderful, and this miracle has been achieved by science, the restless seeker. —J. Hoffmann (undated, ca. 1885, p. 1; translation from German)
‘HUMBOLDTIAN SCIENCE’ AND BEYOND. THE HUMBOLDTIAN WAY OF SEEING AND KNOWING IN VIENNA AND IN FRANZ UNGER’S AND FRIEDRICH SIMONY’S EARTH SCIENCES
History and importance of the geoscience collections at the Natural History Museum Vienna
ABSTRACT The Natural History Museum Vienna is one of the most important museums of natural history in the world. Its collections date back to the year 1750, when the Emperor Franz Stephan of Lorraine (Franz I. Stephan) purchased (from Italy) what was then the largest and most famous collection of natural history specimens. The meteorite collection of the Natural History Museum in Vienna, Austria, has the longest history of all comparable collections in the world. In the second half of the eighteenth century, soon after the foundation of the Imperial Natural History Cabinet in 1750, the Viennese curators began to collect meteorites. Although the first curators neither believed in the extraterrestrial origin nor accepted—in several cases—the written and witnessed histories of these allegedly “heavenly” stone and iron masses, they preserved them in the Natural History collection. Among the first acquisitions were the historical important meteorites Hraschina (Agram), Tabor, Krasnojarsk (Pallas iron), and Eichstädt. These and other well-documented specimens from the Vienna collection were, for example, used by E.F.F. Chladni for his seminal treatises of 1794 and 1819, respectively. The central figure in the early history of the collection is Carl von Schreibers (1775–1852). After the fall of the Stannern meteorite in 1808, he availed himself of every opportunity to acquire meteorite specimens. His continued interest in meteorites laid the foundation for the Vienna collection to be of the historical and scientific importance it is today. Due to the efforts of Schreibers, who also is regarded as founder of meteoritic science in Vienna, and his successors, the Vienna collection became the largest and most extensive in the course of the nineteenth century. In terms of the geological and paleontological collections, early expeditions and collecting campaigns were mainly targeting exotic animals and plants, while paleontological objects were welcome but subordinate. It was only in the early nineteenth century that the paleontological collections were—literally and figuratively speaking—systematically enlarged. Internationalization and diversification became the focus of the collection strategy. The paleontology collections at the Vienna museum also became important in the Darwinian view of evolution.
Abstract Based on existing classifications of caves that often involve descriptive terms, a classification is presented that is based purely on genetic processes. An attribute key is developed that allows the classification of caves by means of cave maps, photographs and reports. This method is applied to a dataset of 6007 caves in a study area in eastern Austria. The area comprises diverse geological units of the Eastern Alps and the southern Bohemian Massif. A total of 94% of the caves could be classified with the surprising result that mechanical weathering and erosion caves are almost as common as solution caves even though the vast majority of caves are developed in carbonate rocks. Field checks confirmed the result and showed that the error is acceptable. The classified caves can also be used as indicator of natural phenomena like gravitational mass movements or vulnerable karst areas by decision-makers non-specialized in cave genesis.