- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
NARROW
GeoRef Subject
-
all geography including DSDP/ODP Sites and Legs
-
Asia
-
Arabian Peninsula
-
Saudi Arabia (1)
-
United Arab Emirates
-
Abu Dhabi (1)
-
-
-
Far East
-
China
-
Sichuan Basin (1)
-
-
-
-
Atlantic Ocean
-
North Atlantic
-
Great Bahama Bank (1)
-
Gulf of Mexico
-
De Soto Canyon (2)
-
Florida Escarpment (1)
-
Mississippi Canyon (1)
-
Viosca Knoll (1)
-
-
-
-
Canada
-
Western Canada
-
Alberta (1)
-
-
-
Caribbean region
-
West Indies
-
Antilles
-
Greater Antilles
-
Cuba (1)
-
-
-
Bahamas (2)
-
-
-
Central America (1)
-
Gulf of Mexico Basin (3)
-
Indian Ocean
-
Red Sea
-
Gulf of Suez (1)
-
-
-
Mexico (2)
-
North America
-
Appalachians (1)
-
Gulf Coastal Plain (61)
-
Williston Basin (1)
-
-
San Juan Basin (1)
-
South America
-
Brazil (1)
-
Venezuela (1)
-
-
United States
-
Alabama
-
Choctaw County Alabama (1)
-
Clarke County Alabama (3)
-
Conecuh County Alabama (4)
-
Escambia County Alabama (7)
-
Mobile Bay (1)
-
Mobile County Alabama (3)
-
Monroe County Alabama (5)
-
-
Arkansas
-
Columbia County Arkansas (6)
-
Lafayette County Arkansas (3)
-
Miller County Arkansas (1)
-
Union County Arkansas (1)
-
-
California (1)
-
Colorado (1)
-
Florida
-
Escambia County Florida
-
Pensacola Florida (1)
-
-
Franklin County Florida
-
Apalachicola Bay (1)
-
-
South Florida Basin (1)
-
-
Illinois (1)
-
Louisiana
-
Bossier Parish Louisiana (1)
-
Caddo Parish Louisiana (1)
-
Claiborne Parish Louisiana (4)
-
Lincoln Parish Louisiana (1)
-
Webster Parish Louisiana (1)
-
-
Michigan (1)
-
Mississippi
-
Choctaw County Mississippi (1)
-
Clarke County Mississippi (4)
-
George County Mississippi (1)
-
Greene County Mississippi (1)
-
Harrison County Mississippi (1)
-
Holmes County Mississippi (1)
-
Jackson County Mississippi (1)
-
Perry County Mississippi (2)
-
Rankin County Mississippi (1)
-
Stone County Mississippi (2)
-
Wayne County Mississippi (1)
-
-
Mississippi Embayment (1)
-
Montana (2)
-
New Mexico (1)
-
Sabine Uplift (1)
-
Texas
-
East Texas (7)
-
East Texas Basin (4)
-
East Texas Field (1)
-
Harrison County Texas (1)
-
Madison County Texas (1)
-
Panola County Texas (1)
-
Rusk County Texas (1)
-
Smith County Texas (1)
-
Upshur County Texas (1)
-
-
Wiggins Arch (5)
-
-
Walker Creek Field (3)
-
Yucatan Peninsula (1)
-
-
commodities
-
bitumens (1)
-
brines (6)
-
energy sources (15)
-
geothermal energy (1)
-
mineral deposits, genesis (1)
-
oil and gas fields (40)
-
petroleum
-
natural gas (24)
-
-
tight sands (1)
-
-
elements, isotopes
-
carbon
-
C-13/C-12 (12)
-
organic carbon (1)
-
-
chemical ratios (1)
-
halogens
-
bromine (1)
-
chlorine (1)
-
-
hydrogen
-
D/H (1)
-
deuterium (1)
-
-
isotope ratios (8)
-
isotopes
-
stable isotopes
-
C-13/C-12 (12)
-
D/H (1)
-
deuterium (1)
-
O-18/O-16 (10)
-
S-34/S-32 (4)
-
Sr-87/Sr-86 (5)
-
-
-
metals
-
alkaline earth metals
-
calcium (1)
-
magnesium (2)
-
strontium
-
Sr-87/Sr-86 (5)
-
-
-
lead (1)
-
nickel (1)
-
vanadium (1)
-
zinc (1)
-
-
nitrogen (2)
-
oxygen
-
O-18/O-16 (10)
-
-
sulfur
-
organic sulfur (1)
-
S-34/S-32 (4)
-
-
-
fossils
-
burrows (1)
-
Invertebrata
-
Bryozoa (1)
-
Cnidaria
-
Anthozoa (2)
-
-
Mollusca
-
Cephalopoda
-
Ammonoidea
-
Ammonites (2)
-
-
-
-
Porifera (1)
-
Vermes (1)
-
-
microfossils (3)
-
Plantae
-
algae (3)
-
-
thallophytes (1)
-
-
geologic age
-
Cenozoic
-
Quaternary
-
Holocene (2)
-
-
Tertiary
-
Neogene
-
Miocene (1)
-
-
Paleogene
-
Eocene
-
lower Eocene (1)
-
middle Eocene
-
Claiborne Group (2)
-
Sparta Sand (1)
-
-
upper Eocene
-
Jackson Group (1)
-
-
-
Oligocene
-
Frio Formation (2)
-
middle Oligocene (1)
-
Vicksburg Group (1)
-
-
Paleocene (1)
-
Wilcox Group (2)
-
-
-
-
Mesozoic
-
Cretaceous
-
Comanchean
-
Buda Limestone (1)
-
Edwards Formation (3)
-
Georgetown Formation (1)
-
Glen Rose Formation (3)
-
Paluxy Formation (1)
-
Pearsall Formation (1)
-
Travis Peak Formation (4)
-
Trinity Group (1)
-
-
Lower Cretaceous
-
Edwards Formation (3)
-
Georgetown Formation (1)
-
Glen Rose Formation (3)
-
Hosston Formation (3)
-
Paluxy Formation (1)
-
Pearsall Formation (1)
-
Sligo Formation (1)
-
Travis Peak Formation (4)
-
Trinity Group (1)
-
-
Upper Cretaceous
-
Buda Limestone (1)
-
Gulfian
-
Austin Group (1)
-
Eagle Ford Formation (1)
-
-
Niobrara Formation (1)
-
Tuscaloosa Formation (2)
-
-
-
Jurassic
-
Norphlet Formation (24)
-
Upper Jurassic
-
Bossier Formation (4)
-
Buckner Formation (10)
-
Cotton Valley Group (10)
-
Haynesville Formation (16)
-
Oxfordian
-
middle Oxfordian (1)
-
-
Schuler Formation (2)
-
Smackover Formation (114)
-
Swift Formation (1)
-
-
-
Triassic (3)
-
-
Paleozoic
-
Carboniferous
-
Mississippian
-
Lower Mississippian
-
Osagian (1)
-
-
Madison Group (1)
-
Upper Mississippian
-
Meramecian
-
Sainte Genevieve Limestone (1)
-
-
-
-
Pennsylvanian
-
Middle Pennsylvanian
-
Paradox Formation (1)
-
-
Strawn Series (1)
-
-
-
Devonian
-
Upper Devonian
-
Nisku Formation (2)
-
-
-
Ordovician
-
Lower Ordovician
-
Ellenburger Group (1)
-
-
Middle Ordovician (1)
-
Trenton Group (1)
-
Upper Ordovician
-
Red River Formation (2)
-
Trentonian (1)
-
-
-
Permian
-
Khuff Formation (1)
-
-
Silurian
-
Upper Silurian
-
Salina Group (1)
-
-
-
-
-
metamorphic rocks
-
turbidite (1)
-
-
minerals
-
carbonates
-
aragonite (3)
-
calcite (8)
-
dolomite (4)
-
magnesian calcite (1)
-
-
halides
-
chlorides
-
halite (1)
-
sylvite (1)
-
-
-
oxides
-
hematite (1)
-
-
silicates
-
framework silicates
-
feldspar group
-
alkali feldspar
-
K-feldspar (1)
-
-
-
silica minerals
-
quartz (1)
-
-
-
sheet silicates
-
chlorite group
-
chlorite (1)
-
-
illite (1)
-
-
-
sulfates
-
anhydrite (8)
-
-
sulfides
-
sphalerite (1)
-
-
-
Primary terms
-
Asia
-
Arabian Peninsula
-
Saudi Arabia (1)
-
United Arab Emirates
-
Abu Dhabi (1)
-
-
-
Far East
-
China
-
Sichuan Basin (1)
-
-
-
-
Atlantic Ocean
-
North Atlantic
-
Great Bahama Bank (1)
-
Gulf of Mexico
-
De Soto Canyon (2)
-
Florida Escarpment (1)
-
Mississippi Canyon (1)
-
Viosca Knoll (1)
-
-
-
-
bibliography (1)
-
bitumens (1)
-
brines (6)
-
Canada
-
Western Canada
-
Alberta (1)
-
-
-
carbon
-
C-13/C-12 (12)
-
organic carbon (1)
-
-
Caribbean region
-
West Indies
-
Antilles
-
Greater Antilles
-
Cuba (1)
-
-
-
Bahamas (2)
-
-
-
Cenozoic
-
Quaternary
-
Holocene (2)
-
-
Tertiary
-
Neogene
-
Miocene (1)
-
-
Paleogene
-
Eocene
-
lower Eocene (1)
-
middle Eocene
-
Claiborne Group (2)
-
Sparta Sand (1)
-
-
upper Eocene
-
Jackson Group (1)
-
-
-
Oligocene
-
Frio Formation (2)
-
middle Oligocene (1)
-
Vicksburg Group (1)
-
-
Paleocene (1)
-
Wilcox Group (2)
-
-
-
-
Central America (1)
-
continental shelf (2)
-
data processing (3)
-
deformation (1)
-
diagenesis (33)
-
economic geology (42)
-
energy sources (15)
-
engineering geology (1)
-
faults (9)
-
geochemistry (12)
-
geophysical methods (15)
-
geothermal energy (1)
-
ground water (4)
-
heat flow (2)
-
hydrogen
-
D/H (1)
-
deuterium (1)
-
-
inclusions
-
fluid inclusions (3)
-
-
Indian Ocean
-
Red Sea
-
Gulf of Suez (1)
-
-
-
Invertebrata
-
Bryozoa (1)
-
Cnidaria
-
Anthozoa (2)
-
-
Mollusca
-
Cephalopoda
-
Ammonoidea
-
Ammonites (2)
-
-
-
-
Porifera (1)
-
Vermes (1)
-
-
isotopes
-
stable isotopes
-
C-13/C-12 (12)
-
D/H (1)
-
deuterium (1)
-
O-18/O-16 (10)
-
S-34/S-32 (4)
-
Sr-87/Sr-86 (5)
-
-
-
maps (2)
-
Mesozoic
-
Cretaceous
-
Comanchean
-
Buda Limestone (1)
-
Edwards Formation (3)
-
Georgetown Formation (1)
-
Glen Rose Formation (3)
-
Paluxy Formation (1)
-
Pearsall Formation (1)
-
Travis Peak Formation (4)
-
Trinity Group (1)
-
-
Lower Cretaceous
-
Edwards Formation (3)
-
Georgetown Formation (1)
-
Glen Rose Formation (3)
-
Hosston Formation (3)
-
Paluxy Formation (1)
-
Pearsall Formation (1)
-
Sligo Formation (1)
-
Travis Peak Formation (4)
-
Trinity Group (1)
-
-
Upper Cretaceous
-
Buda Limestone (1)
-
Gulfian
-
Austin Group (1)
-
Eagle Ford Formation (1)
-
-
Niobrara Formation (1)
-
Tuscaloosa Formation (2)
-
-
-
Jurassic
-
Norphlet Formation (24)
-
Upper Jurassic
-
Bossier Formation (4)
-
Buckner Formation (10)
-
Cotton Valley Group (10)
-
Haynesville Formation (16)
-
Oxfordian
-
middle Oxfordian (1)
-
-
Schuler Formation (2)
-
Smackover Formation (114)
-
Swift Formation (1)
-
-
-
Triassic (3)
-
-
metals
-
alkaline earth metals
-
calcium (1)
-
magnesium (2)
-
strontium
-
Sr-87/Sr-86 (5)
-
-
-
lead (1)
-
nickel (1)
-
vanadium (1)
-
zinc (1)
-
-
Mexico (2)
-
mineral deposits, genesis (1)
-
nitrogen (2)
-
North America
-
Appalachians (1)
-
Gulf Coastal Plain (61)
-
Williston Basin (1)
-
-
oceanography (2)
-
oil and gas fields (40)
-
oxygen
-
O-18/O-16 (10)
-
-
paleoclimatology (3)
-
paleogeography (9)
-
Paleozoic
-
Carboniferous
-
Mississippian
-
Lower Mississippian
-
Osagian (1)
-
-
Madison Group (1)
-
Upper Mississippian
-
Meramecian
-
Sainte Genevieve Limestone (1)
-
-
-
-
Pennsylvanian
-
Middle Pennsylvanian
-
Paradox Formation (1)
-
-
Strawn Series (1)
-
-
-
Devonian
-
Upper Devonian
-
Nisku Formation (2)
-
-
-
Ordovician
-
Lower Ordovician
-
Ellenburger Group (1)
-
-
Middle Ordovician (1)
-
Trenton Group (1)
-
Upper Ordovician
-
Red River Formation (2)
-
Trentonian (1)
-
-
-
Permian
-
Khuff Formation (1)
-
-
Silurian
-
Upper Silurian
-
Salina Group (1)
-
-
-
-
paragenesis (2)
-
petroleum
-
natural gas (24)
-
-
petrology (1)
-
phase equilibria (1)
-
Plantae
-
algae (3)
-
-
plate tectonics (1)
-
reefs (6)
-
reservoirs (2)
-
sea water (1)
-
sea-level changes (11)
-
sedimentary petrology (19)
-
sedimentary rocks
-
carbonate rocks
-
boundstone (4)
-
dolostone (12)
-
grainstone (25)
-
limestone
-
microbialite (2)
-
oolitic limestone (2)
-
-
packstone (8)
-
wackestone (5)
-
-
chemically precipitated rocks
-
evaporites
-
salt (1)
-
-
ironstone (1)
-
-
clastic rocks
-
black shale (1)
-
conglomerate (2)
-
eolianite (1)
-
mudstone (14)
-
red beds (1)
-
sandstone (16)
-
shale (9)
-
-
-
sedimentary structures
-
biogenic structures
-
algal structures (2)
-
bioherms (2)
-
bioturbation (2)
-
oncolites (2)
-
stromatolites (1)
-
thrombolites (4)
-
-
planar bedding structures
-
laminations (6)
-
sand bodies (1)
-
-
secondary structures
-
stylolites (1)
-
-
-
sedimentation (22)
-
sediments
-
clastic sediments
-
sand (1)
-
-
-
South America
-
Brazil (1)
-
Venezuela (1)
-
-
stratigraphy (12)
-
structural geology (5)
-
sulfur
-
organic sulfur (1)
-
S-34/S-32 (4)
-
-
tectonics
-
salt tectonics (10)
-
-
thallophytes (1)
-
United States
-
Alabama
-
Choctaw County Alabama (1)
-
Clarke County Alabama (3)
-
Conecuh County Alabama (4)
-
Escambia County Alabama (7)
-
Mobile Bay (1)
-
Mobile County Alabama (3)
-
Monroe County Alabama (5)
-
-
Arkansas
-
Columbia County Arkansas (6)
-
Lafayette County Arkansas (3)
-
Miller County Arkansas (1)
-
Union County Arkansas (1)
-
-
California (1)
-
Colorado (1)
-
Florida
-
Escambia County Florida
-
Pensacola Florida (1)
-
-
Franklin County Florida
-
Apalachicola Bay (1)
-
-
South Florida Basin (1)
-
-
Illinois (1)
-
Louisiana
-
Bossier Parish Louisiana (1)
-
Caddo Parish Louisiana (1)
-
Claiborne Parish Louisiana (4)
-
Lincoln Parish Louisiana (1)
-
Webster Parish Louisiana (1)
-
-
Michigan (1)
-
Mississippi
-
Choctaw County Mississippi (1)
-
Clarke County Mississippi (4)
-
George County Mississippi (1)
-
Greene County Mississippi (1)
-
Harrison County Mississippi (1)
-
Holmes County Mississippi (1)
-
Jackson County Mississippi (1)
-
Perry County Mississippi (2)
-
Rankin County Mississippi (1)
-
Stone County Mississippi (2)
-
Wayne County Mississippi (1)
-
-
Mississippi Embayment (1)
-
Montana (2)
-
New Mexico (1)
-
Sabine Uplift (1)
-
Texas
-
East Texas (7)
-
East Texas Basin (4)
-
East Texas Field (1)
-
Harrison County Texas (1)
-
Madison County Texas (1)
-
Panola County Texas (1)
-
Rusk County Texas (1)
-
Smith County Texas (1)
-
Upshur County Texas (1)
-
-
Wiggins Arch (5)
-
-
well-logging (6)
-
-
rock formations
-
Eagle Mills Formation (3)
-
Louann Salt (11)
-
San Andres Formation (2)
-
-
sedimentary rocks
-
oolite (7)
-
sedimentary rocks
-
carbonate rocks
-
boundstone (4)
-
dolostone (12)
-
grainstone (25)
-
limestone
-
microbialite (2)
-
oolitic limestone (2)
-
-
packstone (8)
-
wackestone (5)
-
-
chemically precipitated rocks
-
evaporites
-
salt (1)
-
-
ironstone (1)
-
-
clastic rocks
-
black shale (1)
-
conglomerate (2)
-
eolianite (1)
-
mudstone (14)
-
red beds (1)
-
sandstone (16)
-
shale (9)
-
-
-
siliciclastics (2)
-
turbidite (1)
-
-
sedimentary structures
-
burrows (1)
-
channels (1)
-
sedimentary structures
-
biogenic structures
-
algal structures (2)
-
bioherms (2)
-
bioturbation (2)
-
oncolites (2)
-
stromatolites (1)
-
thrombolites (4)
-
-
planar bedding structures
-
laminations (6)
-
sand bodies (1)
-
-
secondary structures
-
stylolites (1)
-
-
-
-
sediments
-
oolite (7)
-
sediments
-
clastic sediments
-
sand (1)
-
-
-
siliciclastics (2)
-
turbidite (1)
-
Smackover Formation
Abstract Three-dimensional circumferential CT-scans have transformed how core is described and calibrated with borehole image (BHI) datasets to refine reservoir rock typing and facies description. This paper focuses on the value of circumferential CT-scans in the assessment of plug and bed-scale heterogeneities. It shows how careful re-orientation and calibration with borehole images can help unravel sandbody geometries and orientation, and the potential effects of cross-cutting deformation bands on permeability architecture and sweep efficiency. This is demonstrated using aeolian-dominated core examples, supported with circumferential CT-scans, minipermeability data, conventional logs and BHI data, taken from the Jurassic Norphlet Formation from producing fields in the Gulf of Mexico. The formation overlies Early Jurassic Louann Salt, and syn-depositional halokinesis significantly influenced depositional accommodation space, facies distribution, and preservation potential. Furthermore, deposition during active salt tectonics has resulted in complex deformation band networks within these clean sandstones. CT-scan density contrasts highlight stratification types and deformation bands not always visible on slabbed core. Furthermore, BHI re-orientated CT-scans provide high-resolution dip/azimuth data and aid aeolian bedset bounding surface definition, which is important for determining dune geometry and stacking patterns. Hence, an integrated approach using core, circumferential CT-scan and calibrated BHI has been essential for deciphering the complexity of these deposits.
Middle Oxfordian carbon cycle perturbation expressed in the Smackover Formation, Gulf of Mexico
Use of seismic attributes and open-hole log data to characterize production variability in a fractured carbonate play: A case study from Madison County, Texas
The Appomattox Field: Norphlet Aeolian Sand Dune Reservoirs in the Deep-Water Gulf of Mexico
ABSTRACT Exploration for oil in the Norphlet reservoir in the deep-water Gulf of Mexico began in 2003 at prospect Shiloh (DC269). The well found oil but not an economic volume. The second prospect, Vicksburg (DC353), was drilled in 2007. This well found a larger in-place volume of oil, but with an immovable solid hydrocarbon component within pore spaces, there was great uncertainty as to the potential producible volumes. Two subsequent wells (Fredericksburg [DC486] and Antietam [DC268]) were dry and had a very small amount of oil, respectively. Finally, in late 2009, the fifth well (Appomattox [MC392]) was a significant discovery of high-quality oil in a thick aeolian Norphlet sandstone.
Stratigraphy and Mineralogy of the Oxfordian Lower Smackover Formation in the Eastern Gulf of Mexico
Abstract The Oxfordian Smackover Formation is generally acknowledged to be a hydrocarbon source for numerous reservoirs in the Gulf of Mexico, both onshore and offshore. More than 25 wells in the eastern Gulf of Mexico have penetrated the Smackover since 2003. Offshore, the Smackover consists predominantly of limestone and shale containing thin organic layers. Immediately above the lower Smackover is a widespread shale marker. This thin shale is correlated as the base of the upper Smackover Formation, which consists of interbedded shale and limestone. This study will demonstrate that the lower Smackover Formation in the eastern Gulf of Mexico (Mississippi Canyon and De Soto Canyon offshore areas) is composed of a series of seven units that occur in the same sequence in virtually every well in which the lower Smackover has been encountered. Although the seven individual units can be resolved readily with the proper wireline suite, each has a sub-seismic thickness. The overall thickness of the lower Smackover is about 300 +/-100 feet. Unlike the lower Smackover, the surrounding Mesozoic formations, from Cotton Valley to Norphlet, vary greatly in thickness in the eastern Gulf. The initial correlations of the units in the lower Smackover were made by comparing the gamma ray, resistivity, and density log patterns with the computed mineralogy of Elemental Capture Spectroscopy (ECS) wireline logs. It was immediately obvious that the same sequence of beds/units was present in the lower Smackover in well after well. Within the lower Smackover Formation is a conspicuous zone characterized by iron-bearing minerals having a matrix density in excess of 3.0 g/cm 3 throughout. However, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) data from rotary sidewall cores was necessary to validate the mineralogy. Because the mineralogy of the ECS log is a model-based calculation from the elemental concentrations of iron, calcium, aluminum, etc,. rather than a direct measurement, the modeled mineralogy can be inaccurate as was the case in the bottom two units. Mineralogy of the seven units has been verified by XRD analyses, albeit from a limited number of rotary sidewall cores obtained in only five wells. The top three units are limestones which vary in carbonate, clay, and pyrite content. The fourth and fifth units contain significant amounts of high density minerals, particularly siderite and pyrite. The sixth zone is dominated by anhydrite. The seventh unit is a hematite-rich shale and its base is an unconformity. Although wireline data are plentiful, analysis of the seven units within the lower Smackover is hampered by the limited amount of rock data and the complete lack of whole core. Many depositional and geochemical questions suggested by the unusual mineralogy and sequence of beds remain unanswered.
Abstract Large parts of the De Soto Canyon Salt Basin are unexplored, and structural and petroleum system models may facilitate continued hydrocarbon exploration, as well as the development of geologic CO 2 storage programs. The basin contains four structural provinces: (1) Destin fault system, (2) salt pillow province, (3) diapir province, and (4) salt roller province. The Destin fault system bounds half grabens that formed near the updip limit of salt. The faults have variable displacement and were active mainly during the Cretaceous. Broad salt pillows occur basinward of the Destin fault system, and the largest of these structures forms the core of Destin Dome. Salt pillows basinward of Destin Dome began forming shortly after Smackover deposition, whereas Destin Dome largely post-dates the Destin fault system. The diapir province is in the structurally deepest part of the salt basin, and diapirism occurred from the Jurassic into the Tertiary. The salt roller province contains a complex array of normal faults and rollover structures that record gravitational shelf spreading during Jurassic time. Petroleum systems analysis indicates that the basin contains a distinctive suite of source rocks, sealing strata, reservoir strata, and trap types. Exploration efforts have thus far proven successful in structures that formed before or during hydrocarbon expulsion, and many such structures remain untested.
Using anisotropic effective medium theories to quantify elastic properties of sandstone-shale laminated rocks
Hydrogen sulfide formation, fate, and behavior in anhydrite-sealed carbonate gas reservoirs: A three-dimensional reactive mass transport modeling approach
Thermal conductivity, thermal gradient, and heat-flow estimations for the Smackover Formation, southwest Arkansas
Subsurface thermal conductivity, thermal gradient, and heat flow are significant parameters when determining the feasibility of utilizing a geologic unit to generate industrial geothermal power. Cores from 18 wells of the subsurface Jurassic Smackover Formation in southwest Arkansas were analyzed at the Arkansas Geological Survey, where thermal conductivity, thermal gradient, and heat-flow values were estimated. Thermal conductivity of several samples was obtained using a KD2 Pro Thermal Analyzer at room temperature. Thermal gradients were estimated from Smackover Formation borehole temperatures, and heat-flow values were calculated from thermal conductivity and thermal gradient values. Average thermal conductivity values for the Smackover Formation are greatest in northeastern Lafayette County at 2.57 W/m·K, followed by southern Columbia and western Calhoun Counties at 2.47 W/m·K each. Northwestern Columbia and northeastern Lafayette Counties exhibit the highest thermal gradient and heat flow, with values averaging 3.51 °C/100 m and 72.3 mW/m 2 , respectively. Interpretation of these parameters confirms that this area exhibits the highest geothermal potential for the Smackover Formation in southwest Arkansas. Investigations further characterizing the Smackover Formation, including in situ thermal properties and borehole temperature measurements, are recommended for future geothermal feasibility studies.