- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
NARROW
GeoRef Subject
-
all geography including DSDP/ODP Sites and Legs
-
Maverick Basin (14)
-
Mexico
-
Coahuila Mexico
-
Parras Basin (1)
-
-
Nuevo Leon Mexico (1)
-
Sabinas Basin (2)
-
-
North America
-
Gulf Coastal Plain (5)
-
-
United States
-
Ouachita Belt (1)
-
Texas
-
Bee County Texas (1)
-
East Texas Basin (1)
-
Leon County Texas (1)
-
Maverick County Texas (3)
-
San Marcos Arch (1)
-
Uvalde County Texas (1)
-
-
-
-
commodities
-
bitumens
-
asphalt (1)
-
-
oil and gas fields (1)
-
petroleum
-
natural gas
-
coalbed methane (2)
-
shale gas (3)
-
-
shale oil (1)
-
-
-
fossils
-
Invertebrata
-
Protista
-
Foraminifera (1)
-
-
-
microfossils (1)
-
-
geologic age
-
Mesozoic
-
Cretaceous
-
Comanchean
-
Edwards Formation (1)
-
Georgetown Formation (1)
-
Glen Rose Formation (1)
-
Pearsall Formation (2)
-
Washita Group (1)
-
-
Lower Cretaceous
-
Cupido Formation (1)
-
Edwards Formation (1)
-
Georgetown Formation (1)
-
Glen Rose Formation (1)
-
Pearsall Formation (2)
-
Sligo Formation (1)
-
-
Upper Cretaceous
-
Cenomanian (2)
-
Gulfian
-
Austin Chalk (2)
-
Eagle Ford Formation (7)
-
Woodbine Formation (1)
-
-
Turonian (2)
-
-
-
-
-
minerals
-
carbonates
-
calcite (1)
-
-
silicates
-
sheet silicates
-
clay minerals (1)
-
-
-
-
Primary terms
-
bitumens
-
asphalt (1)
-
-
data processing (1)
-
deformation (1)
-
diagenesis (2)
-
faults (3)
-
fractures (3)
-
geophysical methods (4)
-
Invertebrata
-
Protista
-
Foraminifera (1)
-
-
-
Mesozoic
-
Cretaceous
-
Comanchean
-
Edwards Formation (1)
-
Georgetown Formation (1)
-
Glen Rose Formation (1)
-
Pearsall Formation (2)
-
Washita Group (1)
-
-
Lower Cretaceous
-
Cupido Formation (1)
-
Edwards Formation (1)
-
Georgetown Formation (1)
-
Glen Rose Formation (1)
-
Pearsall Formation (2)
-
Sligo Formation (1)
-
-
Upper Cretaceous
-
Cenomanian (2)
-
Gulfian
-
Austin Chalk (2)
-
Eagle Ford Formation (7)
-
Woodbine Formation (1)
-
-
Turonian (2)
-
-
-
-
Mexico
-
Coahuila Mexico
-
Parras Basin (1)
-
-
Nuevo Leon Mexico (1)
-
Sabinas Basin (2)
-
-
North America
-
Gulf Coastal Plain (5)
-
-
oil and gas fields (1)
-
paleoclimatology (1)
-
petroleum
-
natural gas
-
coalbed methane (2)
-
shale gas (3)
-
-
shale oil (1)
-
-
sedimentary rocks
-
carbonate rocks
-
limestone (2)
-
-
clastic rocks
-
mudstone (5)
-
sandstone (1)
-
shale (5)
-
tonstein (1)
-
-
coal
-
bituminous coal (2)
-
lignite (1)
-
-
gas shale (1)
-
-
sedimentary structures
-
biogenic structures
-
bioherms
-
mud mounds (1)
-
-
-
-
tectonics (1)
-
United States
-
Ouachita Belt (1)
-
Texas
-
Bee County Texas (1)
-
East Texas Basin (1)
-
Leon County Texas (1)
-
Maverick County Texas (3)
-
San Marcos Arch (1)
-
Uvalde County Texas (1)
-
-
-
well-logging (1)
-
-
sedimentary rocks
-
sedimentary rocks
-
carbonate rocks
-
limestone (2)
-
-
clastic rocks
-
mudstone (5)
-
sandstone (1)
-
shale (5)
-
tonstein (1)
-
-
coal
-
bituminous coal (2)
-
lignite (1)
-
-
gas shale (1)
-
-
-
sedimentary structures
-
sedimentary structures
-
biogenic structures
-
bioherms
-
mud mounds (1)
-
-
-
-
Origin and characterization of Eagle Ford pore networks in the south Texas Upper Cretaceous shelf
An SEM Study of Porosity in the Eagle Ford Shale of Texas—Pore Types and Porosity Distribution in a Depositional and Sequence-stratigraphic Context
John Breyer, Juergen Schieber, Remus Lazar, Kevin Bohacs, Robert Klimentidis, Mirela Dumitrescu, Jeff OttmannAlthough typically considered with a focus on high-resolution petrography, shale porosity should not be thought of as a stand-alone petrographic feature. Shale and mudstone porosity is the outcome of a long succession of processes and events that span the continuum from deposition through burial, compaction, and late diagenesis. For the Eagle Ford Shale this journey began with accumulation in intra-shelf basins at relatively low latitudes on a southeast-facing margin during early parts of the late Cretaceous. To understand the factors that generated and preserved porosity in this economically important interval, a scanning electron microscope study on ion-milled drill-core samples from southern Texas was conducted to understand the development of petrographic features and porosity and place them in stratigraphic context.The studied samples show multiple pore types, including pores defined by mineral frameworks (clay and calcite), shelter pores in foraminifer tests and other hollow fossil debris, and pores in organic material (OM). In many instances, framework and shelter pores are filled with OM that has developed pores due to maturation. Large bubble pores in OM suggest that hydrocarbon liquids were left behind in or migrated into these rocks following petroleum generation and that the bubbles developed as these rocks experienced additional thermal stress. These larger OM pores indicate deeper seated interconnection on ion-milled surfaces and in three-dimensional image stacks.The largest pores occur in the infills of foraminifer tests. The framework of crushed carbonate debris in planktonic fecal pellets shows intermediate levels of porosity, and the silicate-rich matrix that encloses framework components has the smallest average porosity.The distribution of pore types is not uniform. Our hypothesis is that facies association is an important factor that determines bulk porosity and influences reservoir performance. The observed variability in the attributes of the described distal, medial, and proximal facies associations is thought to translate into significant variability of rock properties such as total organic carbon and porosity. In turn, this variability should control the quality and distribution of the intervals that are optimum sources and reservoirs of hydrocarbons in the Eagle Ford Shale. The medial facies association most likely has the best porosity development when a favorable combination of more commonly abundant calcareous fecal pellets and organic material versus clay content is present. The systematic arrangement of facies associations into parasequences provides the basis for testing and predicting the best development of optimal reservoir facies within a sequence-stratigraphic framework in the Eagle Ford Shale. AbstractAlthough typically considered with a focus on high-resolution petrography, shale porosity should not be thought of as a stand-alone petrographic feature. Shale and mudstone porosity is the outcome of a long succession of processes and events that span the continuum from deposition through burial, compaction, and late diagenesis. For the Eagle Ford Shale this journey began with accumulation in intra-shelf basins at relatively low latitudes on a southeast-facing margin during early parts of the late Cretaceous. To understand the factors that generated and preserved porosity in this economically important interval, a scanning electron microscope study on ion-milled drill-core samples from southern Texas was conducted to understand the development of petrographic features and porosity and place them in stratigraphic context.The studied samples show multiple pore types, including pores defined by mineral frameworks (clay and calcite), shelter pores in foraminifer tests and other hollow fossil debris, and pores in organic material (OM). In many instances, framework and shelter pores are filled with OM that has developed pores due to maturation. Large bubble pores in OM suggest that hydrocarbon liquids were left behind in or migrated into these rocks following petroleum generation and that the bubbles developed as these rocks experienced additional thermal stress. These larger OM pores indicate deeper seated interconnection on ion-milled surfaces and in three-dimensional image stacks.The largest pores occur in the infills of foraminifer tests. The framework of crushed carbonate debris in planktonic fecal pellets shows intermediate levels of porosity, and the silicate-rich matrix that encloses framework components has the smallest average porosity.The distribution of pore types is not uniform. Our hypothesis is that facies association is an important factor that determines bulk porosity and influences reservoir performance. The observed variability in the attributes of the described distal, medial, and proximal facies associations is thought to translate into significant variability of rock properties such as total organic carbon and porosity. In turn, this variability should control the quality and distribution of the intervals that are optimum sources and reservoirs of hydrocarbons in the Eagle Ford Shale. The medial facies association most likely has the best porosity development when a favorable combination of more commonly abundant calcareous fecal pellets and organic material versus clay content is present. The systematic arrangement of facies associations into parasequences provides the basis for testing and predicting the best development of optimal reservoir facies within a sequence-stratigraphic framework in the Eagle Ford Shale.