Abstract Late Pennsylvanian conodont faunas were dominated by idiognathodids historically assigned to Idiognathodus (flat P 1 ) or Streptognathodus (troughed P 1 ). Recent work suggests clades arose iteratively, through time, from unrelated ancestors in different geographical regions. The end-Desmoinesian extinction event terminated two major genera, Swadelina (troughed) and Neognathodus (long carina), and comparable new morphotypes developed from surviving Idiognathodus species in the early Kasimovian, especially in North America. True Streptognathodus (troughed) and Heckelina n. gen (asymmetric, eccentric groove) appeared in North America in the mid-Kasimovian. Another troughed clade arose in Eurasia (‘ S. ’ 2) and attained a global distribution by the late Kasimovian. A second, early Gzhelian, Eurasian radiation produced new troughed forms (‘ S. ’ 4) that dominated Gzhelian faunas globally. In South China, endemic clades of eccentrically grooved Idiognathodus ? and troughed forms (‘ S .’ 3) appeared in the late Kasimovian and persisted into the Gzhelian. Typical Idiognathodus species were uncommon by the late Kasimovian and disappeared in the mid-Gzhelian. After a low diversity interval in the mid-Gzhelian, a new major radiation of weakly troughed forms occurred (‘ S. ’ 5), which led to redevelopment of Idiognathodus -like elements in the Cisuralian. Other conodont genera from offshore ( Gondolella, Idioprioniodus ) and nearshore settings ( Hindeodus, Diplognathodus, Adetognathus, Ellisonia ) are poorly studied and show low diversity and little morphological change.

Abstract Late Moscovian–early Gzhelian conodonts occur abundantly in a newly discovered slope section, the Shanglong section, southern Guizhou, South China. The conodont fauna is dominated by P1 elements of Idiognathodus and associated with elements of Swadelina , Streptognathodus and Heckelina . A total of 62 species, including species in open nomenclature, were identified, which are assigned to eight genera. Index conodont species of Middle and Late Pennsylvanian, e.g. I. podolskensis Group, Sw. sp. A, Sw . subexcelsa , Sw . makhlinae , I . heckeli , I . magnificus , I . guizhouensis , H. eudoraensis , I . naraoensis , and H . simulator are all recovered, and their 10 conodont zones are recognized. The richness and abundance of the conodonts throughout the section are analysed. Conodont richness ranges from 1 to 14 and is positively related to conodont abundance (1–379). The composition of conodont elements, i.e. sinistral v. dextral, P1 v. non-P1 and adult v. subadult and juvenile, is presented. The numerical cluster technique is employed to identify four subbiofacies of the slope setting, namely the I . podolskensis , Swadelina , I. swadei–magnificus and Streptognathodus – Heckelina–Idiognathodus subbiofacies.

Abstract The Late Pennsylvanian was a critical juncture in tetrapod evolution when many terrestrially adapted taxa first appeared. The Middle Pennsylvanian (Moscovian) tetrapod record reflects a taphonomic megabias that favoured preservation, discovery and collection of aquatic tetrapods that lived in wetland palaeoenvironments (‘coal swamps’). The Kasimovian tetrapod record is limited to seven localities, all but one in the USA, and two of which are singleton records, so it is less abundant, diverse or widespread than earlier Moscovian and later Gzhelian tetrapod records. This ‘Kasimovian bottleneck’ hinders interpretation of tetrapod evolutionary events across the Middle–Late Pennsylvanian boundary. Significant changes did take place across that boundary, but they were spread out over Moscovian through Gzhelian time. Many of the perceived changes in tetrapods across the Middle–Late Pennsylvanian boundary are largely artefacts of facies changes and the Moscovian tetrapod taphonomic megabias and of the limited fossil record of Kasimovian tetrapods. Therefore, there is no simple link between Late Pennsylvanian tetrapod evolutionary events and changes in climate and vegetation.

Abstract: The reverse polarity Kiaman Superchron has strong evidence for at least three, or probably four, normal magnetochrons during the early Permian. Normal magnetochrons are during the early Asselian (base CI1r.1n at 297.94±0.33 Ma), late Artinskian (CI2n at 281.24±2.3 Ma), mid-Kungurian (CI3n at 275.86±2.0 Ma) and Roa"dian (CI3r.an at 269.54±1.6 Ma). The mixed-polarity Illawarra Superchron begins in the early Wordian at 266.66±0.76 Ma. The Wordian–Capitanian interval is biased to normal polarity, but the basal Wuchiapingian begins the beginning of a significant reverse polarity magnetochron LP0r, with an overlying mixed-polarity interval through the later Lopingian. No significant magnetostratigraphic data gaps exist in the Permian geomagnetic polarity record. The early Cisuralian magnetochrons are calibrated to a succession of fusulinid zones, the later Cisuralian and Guadalupian to a conodont and fusulinid biostratigraphy, and Lopingian magnetochrons to conodont zonations. Age calibration of the magnetochrons is obtained through a Bayesian approach using 35 radiometric dates, and 95% confidence intervals on the ages and chron durations are obtained. The dating control points are most numerous in the Gzhelian–Asselian, Wordian and Changhsingian intervals. This significant advance should provide a framework for better correlation and dating of the marine and non-marine Permian.