ABSTRACT The geology of Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GRSM) in Tennessee and North Carolina is dominated by siliciclastics and metamorphic strata. However, in the western portion of GRSM, a series of carbonate fensters (windows) expose the Lower Ordovician–age section of the Knox Group, a series of dolomite and limestone units that are partially marbleized as a result of contact metamorphism from the Great Smoky fault. The fensters create opportunities for allogenic recharge to occur at points along the contact of the surrounding insoluble strata with the underlying soluble carbonates. The combination of chemically aggressive surface recharge and vertical relief has resulted in the formation of deep caves, many of which have active streams and water resources. Though the karst is limited in extent and the number of caves is fairly small, the significance of the resources is substantial, with several of the caves in the area over 150 m in depth and at least two being major bat hibernacula. In 2017, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) began a study to better understand the hydrologic behavior of these karst systems through hydrologic and geochemical monitoring, groundwater tracing using fluorescent dyes, and seepage runs. Stage and water-quality instrumentation was installed in two caves in GRSM, the main stream of Bull Cave, and in a sump pool in Whiteoak Blowhole, at 173 m and 70 m below land surface, respectively. Following setup of the cave sites, dye injections were conducted to determine discharge points for four of the deep cave systems on Rich Mountain and Turkeypen ridge. Results show water in these systems has an extremely rapid travel time, with tracers detected from caves to springs in less than 24 h for each of the systems. This field guide describes the complex geology, regional hydrogeology, and unique landscape characterized by high-gradient subterranean streams, carbonate fensters, and deep caves of the GRSM karst.

ABSTRACT The eastern Great Smoky Mountains basement complex consists of the following components: (1) ca. 1350–1325 Ma orthogneiss and mafic xenoliths that represent some of the oldest crust in Appalachian Grenville massifs (similar to “pre-Grenville” basement components in the Adirondack, Green Mountain, Hudson Highland, and Shenandoah massifs); (2) ca. 1150 Ma augen orthogneisses and granitic orthogneisses correlating with the Shawinigan phase of Grenville magmatism; and (3) paragneisses (cover rocks) that have either pre- or syn-Grenville (i.e., Mesoproterozoic) versus post-Grenville (Neoproterozoic) depositional ages, and that experienced Taconian metamorphism and migmatization. Mesoproterozoic paragneisses contain major zircon age modes that require a component of Proterozoic crust in the source region. The Neoproterozoic paragneisses exhibit the archetypical “Grenville doublet” in detrital zircon age distributions that matches the age distribution of Ottawan and Shawinigan magmatic/metamorphic events in eastern Laurentia. Most zircon U-Pb age systematics exhibit variable lead loss interpreted to result from high-grade Taconian (ca. 450 Ma) regional metamorphism and migmatization. Neodymium mantle model ages (T DM ) for ortho- and paragneisses range from 1.8 to 1.6 Ga, indicating that all rocks were derived from recycling of Proterozoic crust (i.e., they are not juvenile), which is consistent with Proterozoic detrital zircon ages in pre- to syn-Grenville paragneisses. Lead isotope compositions confirm the presence of an exotic (Amazonian) crustal component in the source region for the protoliths of the pre-Grenville orthogneisses and xenoliths, and that this exotic component was incorporated to varying degrees in the evolution of the basement complex. The oldest age component may represent an Amazonian pre-Grenville analog to the ca. 1.35 Ga native Laurentian crust present in Adirondack and northern Appalachian basement massifs.

Abstract Sedimentary basins in the eastern United States (U.S.) contain strata ranging in age from Neoproterozoic to Holocene and have been the source of petroleum and coal that fueled much of the initial growth and development of the U.S. as a major industrial power. It is estimated that at least 87 billion barrels of oil (BBO) and natural gas liquids (BBNGL) and 664 trillion cubic feet of natural gas (TCFG) have been produced to-date from these basins. These basins developed on continental and transitional oceanic-continental crust ranging in age from the Paleoproterozoic to Triassic. Many of these basins have undergone structural readjustment and uplift, some being nearly completely inverted. The oldest of these basins considered here are Mesoproterozoic to Early Cambrian in age. They include the Midcontinent rift, Reelfoot rift, Rough Creek graben, and Rome trough. These basins are dominantly rift basins, which formed within the North American craton, presumably as a result of plate tectonic forces associated with the rifting of the Rodina supercontinent and the opening of the Iapetus Ocean. Petroleum systems have been identified or postulated in these four basins. Overlying these basins are the three large Paleozoic-aged sag-foreland basins of the eastern U.S.: the Michigan, Illinois, and Appalachian basins. Additionally included are the eastern extent of the Arkoma-Ouachita-Black Warrior foreland basin and a relict Gondwanan basin that was left behind in present-day north Florida following the Mesozoic rifting of Pangea. A mixed siliciclastic–carbonate–evaporite sedimentary section includes reservoirs and seal facies for many play types. Multiple petroleum systems have been identified or postulated in all of these basins. Succeeding these large Paleozoic sag and foreland basins are the Late Permian(?) to Early Jurassic rift basins that rim the eastern continental margin of the U.S. These basins have formed as a result of plate tectonic forces associated with the opening of the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico. Basin-fill sequences are generally lacustrine and continental-playa siliciclastic strata containing locally significant coals and minor carbonates. Petroleum systems have been identified or postulated in several of these basins, including the Dan River-Danville, Deep River, Newark, Richmond, and Taylorsville basins. Finally, overlying this complex stack of Proterozoic, Paleozoic, and early Mesozoic basins are the great Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic margin basins. The Gulf of Mexico Basin is distinguished by the dominating structural control of the salt and shale tectonics on a mobile substrate, whereas the basins of the western Atlantic margin are associated mainly with faulting associated with the opening of the Atlantic Ocean. Only the Carolina Trough of the western Atlantic margin basins has mobile salt structures. The sedimentary sequences of both basins are a mixed siliciclastic–carbonate interval containing coal and lignite in variable quantities in the updip portions of the basins. A composite total petroleum system has been identified in the Gulf of Mexico basin that incorporates several Mesozoic and Cenozoic petroleum source rocks with many reservoir rocks and seals throughout the sedimentary sequence. A combination of cultural and tectonic setting, sediment provenance and delivery systems, and paleo-oceanographic conditions have made the Gulf of Mexico basin one of the most prolific petroleum provinces on the planet. The current understanding of the Atlantic margin basin suggests that it does not appear to have a similar accumulation of petroleum resources as the Gulf of Mexico Basin. Correlated and potential petroleum source rock intervals have been penetrated in several of the offshore post-rift Atlantic margin subbasins; however, in many places on the shallow shelf, these intervals are generally too organically lean and (or) too immature to be major source rocks. A single petroleum system has been locally demonstrated in the offshore Atlantic by a non-commercial gas-condensate discovery. Additional petroleum systems in the western Atlantic may be identified as research continues. Source rock intervals penetrated by Deep Sea Drilling Project and Ocean Drilling Program cruises farther off-shore have generative potential, but data from these projects are too sparse to identify petroleum systems connecting these source rocks with potential reservoir targets.